Examining Teaming and Tier 2 and 3 Practices Within a PBIS Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072110510
Author(s):  
Rhonda N. T. Nese ◽  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Behavior Support ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Core Feature

One core feature of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) is a systems-level teaming process for coordinating staff implementation of evidence-based practices and monitoring student progress across all three tiers. Prior research has shown schools that report regular teaming and team-based data use are more likely to successfully adopt and sustain implementation of multi-tiered systems of behavior support. However, more research is currently needed to better understand the various teaming configurations, structures, and practices commonly used by PBIS teams in typical schools, particularly at advanced tiers. For the current study, members of school and district PBIS teams representing 718 schools were surveyed to better understand (a) teaming configurations and practices currently being used in schools implementing PBIS and (b) common interventions that PBIS teams report implementing at Tiers 2 and 3. Survey findings are discussed, along with implications of those results for future research and practice in applied settings.

An analysis of teacher perceived barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13
Author(s):  
John J. Wheeler ◽  
Stacy L. Carter ◽  
Samuel E. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Widespread Implementation

Evidence-based practices in the field of special education within the United States has been well defined in the literature yet challenges persist with the widespread implementation of these practices within school settings. There are many factors that can negatively influence the portability of these practices in classroom settings that remain unaddressed in the literature. The results of a qualitative evaluation aimed at determining teacher’s perspectives on barriers to implementing evidence-based procedures in the area of positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) are described. Data analysis revealed several highly pertinent barriers that teachers face in their attempts to implement evidence-based practices in the classroom. Recommendations for minimizing these implementation barriers are discussed.

Enhancing Family Engagement in Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Andrew Garbacz
Keyword(s):  
School Climate ◽  
Positive Behavior Support ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Family Engagement ◽  
Positive Behavior ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Behavior Support ◽  
Appropriate Behavior ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Pilot Investigation

Schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) is a systems-level approach to promote appropriate behavior, increase academic achievement, and improve school climate. The PBIS infrastructure engages families as partners in school systems and extends evidence-based positive behavior support to the home. The article discusses a pilot investigation and describes objectives, associated activities, and implementation guidance to engage families as partners in PBIS.

Funding Support for School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Implementation and Scale-Up

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Gage ◽  
Jennifer Freeman ◽  
Robert H. Horner ◽  
George Sugai ◽  
Timothy J. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Effective Practices ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Implementation Effort ◽  
General Funding

The process of selecting, implementing, and scaling-up evidence-based practices is a major focus and difficult accomplishment for states. Renewed commitment to improving student outcomes has led directly to the need for effective practices implemented at scale. The funding decisions made at state, regional, and district levels remain a key to large-scale implementation of effective practices. In this article, we summarize the funding decisions of nine states that implemented School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) across at least 500 schools or 30% of the schools in the state. A survey about funding sources, funding levels, and funding decisions was completed by the key implementers in each state, and a follow-up interview was used to clarify and confirm initial information. The results indicate that different states used different funding approaches, but in general, funding of SWPBIS was provided predominantly through special education sources and that initial demonstrations led to larger scale implementation when state policy makers developed creative procedures for using multiple funding sources within a unified implementation effort. Implications for funding the scaling of evidence-based practices are discussed.

Variables Contributing to Abandonment and Readoption of SWPBIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Sarah E. Pinkelman ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Personnel ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
School Administrator ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
New School ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Perceived Reasons

There is a dearth of research examining school and district factors associated with the abandonment of evidence-based practice in schools. In this mixed methods study, we surveyed 23 school personnel working with 30 schools that abandoned and then readopted school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). Our aims were to identify critical features abandoned and perceived reasons for abandonment and readoption of SWPBIS practices. SWPBIS features most often abandoned included data-based decision making and school-wide acknowledgment systems. Lack of staff buy-in was the most commonly reported reason for abandonment, and a new school administrator was the most commonly reported reason for readoption. Implications for research and how schools could safeguard against abandonment of evidence-based practices are discussed.

Multitiered Systems of Supports, Response to Intervention, and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Samantha Bates ◽  
LaShonda Linnen ◽  
Stephanie Columbia ◽  
Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Response To Intervention ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Students At Risk ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Based ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

This chapter covers the Response to Intervention framework, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, and multitiered systems of supports (MTSS). The Response to Intervention framework is a central step in implementing a successful MTSS framework. MTSS delivers school-based supports across three tiers: tier 1 (universal), tier 2 (targeted), and tier 3 (individualized). The MTSS framework is a resource that enables schools to use data not only to identify students at risk for poor learning outcomes but also to monitor student progress and deliver evidence-based interventions. The chapter provides examples of ways social workers can maximize the utility of these models and school teams to improve student outcomes.

Using Data-Based Individualization to Intensify Behavioral Interventions

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese M. Cumming ◽  
Sue C. O’Neill
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
The Third ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavior Disabilities ◽  
Behavioral Supports ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Tier 3 ◽  
And Behavior

Students receiving behavioral supports in the third tier of the schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) framework are often identified as having emotional and behavior disabilities. Although educators implement evidence-based practices with fidelity, these practices are not always effective in supporting students with emotional and behavior disabilities to improve their behavior. This article provides an overview of the process of data-based individualization (DBI) to intensify behavioral interventions for students identified as having emotional and behavior disabilities receiving Tier 3 supports. The steps of the DBI process are explained, with a focus on using data to intensify interventions. These practices are examined as components of the broader SWPBIS Tier 3 framework.

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

Understanding the characteristics of professional development programs for teachers’ health and wellbeing: Implications for research and practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 000494412110034
Author(s):  
Lucy Corbett ◽  
Philayrath Phongsavan ◽  
Louisa R Peralta ◽  
Adrian Bauman
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Health And Wellbeing ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Australian Education ◽  
Teacher Wellbeing ◽  
Evidence Based Programs

Professional development (PD) provides an opportunity to promote the psychological, social, and physical health tools teachers require to maintain teacher wellbeing. Despite their potential, little is known about PD programs targeting the health and wellbeing of Australian teachers. This study aimed to summarize the characteristics of Australian PD programs targeted at teacher wellbeing, identify gaps in existing PD and make recommendations for future research and practice. Three search strategies, (1) search engine results, (2) a manual search of known Australian education websites, and (3) requests for information from Australian education organizations, were combined to ensure a comprehensive inventory of PD programs was compiled. This study found 63 PD programs promoting health and wellbeing that currently exist for Australian teachers. Of these, only three provided evidence of their evaluation indicating programs are advertised and implemented without evidence of their effectiveness. Future PD should be evaluated with findings of the evaluations reported publicly so evidence-based programs promoting teacher’s health and wellbeing can be recommended and implemented.

The Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia: Application to Music Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaine E Reschke-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Music Therapy ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Intervention Development ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Practice Model

Abstract Currently, no drug can cure or effectively mitigate symptoms for the growing number of individuals who live with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. As they experience declines in memory, communication, and thinking—symptoms that undermine social initiative, autonomy, and well-being—these individuals become increasingly dependent on others. Evidence regarding the benefits of music therapy for persons with dementia is growing. Nonetheless, limitations in existing research have hindered knowledge regarding the use and appropriate application of music as a form of treatment with this population. This article describes the development of The Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia, which provides a theoretical framework to inform evidence-based practice, illustrated here in application to music therapy. Specifically, the model is intended to prompt purposeful application of strategies documented within a broad literature base within 6 thematic areas (Cognition, Attention, Familiarity, Audibility, Structure, and Autonomy); facilitate clinical decision-making and intervention development, including music interventions; and encourage discourse regarding relationships between characteristics of the intervention, the therapist, the person with dementia, and their response to intervention. The model comprises a set of testable assumptions to provide direction for future research and to facilitate the description and investigation of mechanisms underlying behavioral interventions with this population. Although the model is likely to evolve as knowledge is gained, it offers a foundation for holistically considering an individual’s needs and strengths, guidance for applying music and nonmusic strategies in evidence-based practice, and direction for future research.

Clinical Interventions in Problem-Solving Courts

2019 ◽  
pp. 33-49
Author(s):  
David DeMatteo ◽  
Kirk Heilbrun ◽  
Alice Thornewill ◽  
Shelby Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Therapeutic Communities ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Clinical Interventions ◽  
Trauma Informed Care ◽  
Problem Solving Courts ◽  
Trauma Informed ◽  
Assessment Procedures

This chapter focuses on the clinical interventions most commonly delivered in problem-solving courts. The chapter begins with a discussion of the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Model, which provides a foundational context for the interventions used in problem-solving courts and highlights the importance of targeting offender needs—criminogenic needs—related to key outcomes (e.g., reduced recidivism, reduced relapse to drug use). The authors then discuss the various screening and risk assessment procedures used to admit offenders to problem-solving courts, the clinical interventions used in problem-solving courts (e.g., cognitive-behavioral interventions, 12-step programs, therapeutic communities, case management, trauma-informed care), and the use of evidence-based practices in problem-solving courts. The authors note the role of problem-solving courts as a watchdog for service provision and conclude with a section discussing “next steps” for expanding evidence-based interventions in problem-solving courts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document