scholarly journals Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e1006575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gihan Weerasinghe ◽  
Benoit Duchet ◽  
Hayriye Cagnan ◽  
Peter Brown ◽  
Christian Bick ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gihan Weerasinghe ◽  
Benoit Duchet ◽  
Christian Bick ◽  
Rafal Bogacz

AbstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment option for a variety of neurological disorders, including Parkinson’s disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). It is widely believed that the efficacy, efficiency and side-effects of the treatment can be improved by stimulating ‘closed-loop’, according to the symptoms of a patient. Multi-contact electrodes powered by independent current sources are a recent development in DBS technology which allow for greater precision when targeting one or more pathological regions but, in order to realise the potential of such systems, algorithms must be developed to deal with their increased complexity. This motivates the need to understand how applying DBS to multiple regions (or neural populations) can affect the efficacy and efficiency of the treatment. On the basis of a theoretical model, our paper aims to address the question of how to best apply DBS to multiple neural populations to maximally desynchronise brain activity. Using a coupled oscillator model, we derive analytical expressions which predict how the symptom severity should change as a result of applying stimulation. On the basis of these expressions we derive an algorithm describing when the stimulation should be delivered to individual contacts. Remarkably, these expressions also allow us to determine the conditions for when stimulation using information from individual contacts is likely to be advantageous. Using numerical simulation, we demonstrate that our methods have the potential to be both more effective and efficient than existing methods found in the literature.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 448-454
Author(s):  
Thomas Grunwald ◽  
Judith Kröll

Zusammenfassung. Wenn mit den ersten beiden anfallspräventiven Medikamenten keine Anfallsfreiheit erzielt werden konnte, so ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dies mit anderen Medikamenten zu erreichen, nur noch ca. 10 %. Es sollte dann geprüft werden, warum eine Pharmakoresistenz besteht und ob ein epilepsiechirurgischer Eingriff zur Anfallsfreiheit führen kann. Ist eine solche Operation nicht möglich, so können palliative Verfahren wie die Vagus-Nerv-Stimulation (VNS) und die tiefe Hirnstimulation (Deep Brain Stimulation) in eine bessere Anfallskontrolle ermöglichen. Insbesondere bei schweren kindlichen Epilepsien stellt auch die ketogene Diät eine zu erwägende Option dar.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Richards ◽  
Paul M. Wilson ◽  
Pennie S. Seibert ◽  
Carin M. Patterson ◽  
Caitlin C. Otto ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter Covert ◽  
Pennie S. Seibert ◽  
Caitlin C. Otto ◽  
Missy Coblentz ◽  
Nicole Whitener ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document