scholarly journals An uncertainty-based model of the effects of fixation on choice

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. e1009190
Author(s):  
Zhi-Wei Li ◽  
Wei Ji Ma

When people view a consumable item for a longer amount of time, they choose it more frequently; this also seems to be the direction of causality. The leading model of this effect is a drift-diffusion model with a fixation-based attentional bias. Here, we propose an explicitly Bayesian account for the same data. This account is based on the notion that the brain builds a posterior belief over the value of an item in the same way it would over a sensory variable. As the agent gathers evidence about the item from sensory observations and from retrieved memories, the posterior distribution narrows. We further postulate that the utility of an item is a weighted sum of the posterior mean and the negative posterior standard deviation, with the latter accounting for risk aversion. Fixating for longer can increase or decrease the posterior mean, but will inevitably lower the posterior standard deviation. This model fits the data better than the original attentional drift-diffusion model but worse than a variant with a collapsing bound. We discuss the often overlooked technical challenges in fitting models simultaneously to choice and response time data in the absence of an analytical expression. Our results hopefully contribute to emerging accounts of valuation as an inference process.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Li ◽  
Wei-Ji Ma

When people view a consumable item for a longer amount of time, they choose it more frequently~\cite{krajbich_visual_2010}; this also seems to be the direction of causality~\cite{armel_biasing_2008}. The leading model of this effect is a drift-diffusion model with a fixation-based attentional bias. While this model accounts for the data, it is not normative, in the sense that it does not provide a rationale for this behavioral tendency. Here, we propose a partially normative account for the same data. This account is based on the notion that the brain builds a posterior belief over the value of an item in the same way it would over a sensory variable. As the agent gathers evidence about the item from sensory observations and from retrieved memories, the posterior distribution narrows. We further postulate that the utility of an item is a weighted sum of the posterior mean and the negative posterior standard deviation. Fixating for longer can increase or decrease the posterior mean, but will inevitably lower the posterior standard deviation. This model fits the data approximately as well as the attentional drift-diffusion model. We discuss the often overlooked technical challenges in fitting models simultaneously to choice and response time data in the absence of an analytical expression. Our results contribute to emerging accounts of valuation as an inference process.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moens Vincent ◽  
Zenon Alexandre

AbstractThe Drift Diffusion Model (DDM) is a popular model of behaviour that accounts for patterns of accuracy and reaction time data. In the Full DDM implementation, parameters are allowed to vary from trial-to-trial, making the model more powerful but also more challenging to fit to behavioural data. Current approaches yield typically poor fitting quality, are computationally expensive and usually require assuming constant threshold parameter across trials. Moreover, in most versions of the DDM, the sequence of participants’ choices is considered independent and identically distributed(i.i.d.), a condition often violated in real data.Our contribution to the field is threefold: first, we introduce Variational Bayes as a method to fit the full DDM. Second, we relax thei.i.d. assumption, and propose a data-driven algorithm based on a Recurrent Auto-Encoder (RAE-DDM), that estimates the local posterior probability of the DDM parameters at each trial based on the sequence of parameters and data preceding the current data point. Finally, we extend this algorithm to illustrate that the RAE-DDM provides an accurate modelling framework for regression analysis. An important result of the approach we propose is that inference at the trial level can be achieved efficiently for each and every parameter of the DDM, threshold included. This data-driven approach is highly generic and self-contained, in the sense that no external input (e.g. regressors or physiological measure) is necessary to fit the data. Using simulations, we show that this method outperformsi.i.d.-based approaches (either Markov Chain Monte Carlo ori.i.d.-VB) without making any assumption about the nature of the between-trial correlation of the parameters.


2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon M. Turner ◽  
Leendert van Maanen ◽  
Birte U. Forstmann

2014 ◽  
Vol 116 (19) ◽  
pp. 194504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Lumb ◽  
Myles A. Steiner ◽  
John F. Geisz ◽  
Robert J. Walters

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankur Gupta ◽  
Rohini Bansal ◽  
Hany Alashwal ◽  
Anil Safak Kacar ◽  
Fuat Balci ◽  
...  

Many studies on the drift-diffusion model (DDM) explain decision-making based on a unified analysis of both accuracy and response times. This review provides an in-depth account of the recent advances in DDM research which ground different DDM parameters on several brain areas, including the cortex and basal ganglia. Furthermore, we discuss the changes in DDM parameters due to structural and functional impairments in several clinical disorders, including Parkinson's disease, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorders, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia. This review thus uses DDM to provide a theoretical understanding of different brain disorders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document