scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus emtricitabine versus standard ART for the maintenance of HIV-1 suppression: 48-week results of the factorial, randomized, non-inferiority SIMPL’HIV trial

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1003421
Author(s):  
Delphine Sculier ◽  
Gilles Wandeler ◽  
Sabine Yerly ◽  
Annalisa Marinosci ◽  
Marcel Stoeckle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hiv 1

Background Dolutegravir (DTG)–based dual therapy is becoming a new paradigm for both the initiation and maintenance of HIV treatment. The SIMPL’HIV study investigated the outcomes of virologically suppressed patients on standard combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) switching to DTG + emtricitabine (FTC). We present the 48-week efficacy and safety data on DTG + FTC versus cART. Methods and findings SIMPL’HIV was a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized trial with a factorial design among treatment-experienced people with HIV in Switzerland. Participants were enrolled between 12 May 2017 and 30 May 2018. Patients virologically suppressed for at least 24 weeks on standard cART were randomized 1:1 to switching to DTG + FTC or to continuing cART, and 1:1 to simplified patient-centered monitoring versus standard monitoring. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients virologically suppressed with <100 copies/ml through 48 weeks. The secondary endpoints included virological suppression at 48 weeks according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot analysis. Non-inferiority of DTG + FTC versus cART for viral suppression was assessed using a stratified Mantel–Haenszel risk difference, with non-inferiority declared if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was greater than −12%. Adverse events were monitored to assess safety. Quality of life was evaluated using the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire. Ninety-three participants were randomized to DTG + FTC, and 94 individuals to cART. Median nadir CD4 count was 246 cells/mm3; median age was 48 years; 17% of participants were female. DTG + FTC was non-inferior to cART. The proportion of patients with viral suppression (<100 copies/ml) through 48 weeks was 93.5% in the DTG + FTC arm and 94.7% in the cART arm in the intention-to-treat population (risk difference −1.2%; 95% CI −7.8% to 5.6%). Per-protocol analysis showed similar results, with viral suppression in 96.5% of patients in both arms (risk difference 0.0%; 95% CI −5.6% to 5.5%). There was no relevant interaction between the type of treatment and monitoring (interaction ratio 0.98; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.13; p = 0.81). Using the FDA snapshot algorithm, 84/93 (90.3%) participants in the DTG + FTC arm had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of <50 copies/ml compared to 86/94 (91.5%) participants on standard cART (risk difference −1.1%; 95% CI −9.3% to 7.1%; p = 0.791). The overall proportion of patients with adverse events and discontinuations did not differ by randomization arm. The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was higher in the cART arm (16%) compared to the DTG + FTC arm (6.5%) (p = 0.041), but none was considered to be related to the study medication. Quality of life improved more between baseline and week 48 in the DTG + FTC compared to the cART arm (adjusted difference +2.6; 95% CI +0.4 to +4.7). The study’s main limitations included a rather small proportion of women included, the open label design, and its short duration. Conclusions In this study, DTG + FTC as maintenance therapy was non-inferior to cART in terms of efficacy, with a similar safety profile and a greater improvement in quality of life, thus expanding the offer of 2-drug simplification options among virologically suppressed individuals. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03160105.

An Open-Label, Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Pituitary Radiosurgery for Patients With Opioid-Refractory Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Borius ◽  
Stéphanie Ranque Garnier ◽  
Karine Baumstarck ◽  
Frédéric Castinetti ◽  
Anne Donnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

Abstract BACKGROUND Hypophysectomy performed by craniotomy or percutaneous techniques leads to complete pain relief in more than 70% to 80% of cases for opioid refractory cancer pain. Radiosurgery could be an interesting alternative approach to reduce complications. OBJECTIVE To assess the analgesic efficacy compared with standard of care is the primary goal. The secondary objectives are to assess ophthalmic and endocrine tolerance, drug consumption, quality of life, and mechanisms of analgesic action. METHODS The trial is multicenter, randomized, prospective, and open-label with 2 parallel groups. This concerns patients in palliative care suffering from nociceptive or mixed cancer pain, refractory to standard opioid therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving standards of care for pain according to recommendations, or to the experimental group receiving a pituitary GammaKnife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (160 Gy delivered in pituitary gland) associated with standards of care. Evaluation assessments will be taken at baseline, day0, day4, day7, day14, day28, day45, month3, and month6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We could expect pain improvement in 70% to 90% of cases at day4. In addition we will assess the safety of pituitary radiosurgery in a vulnerable population. The secondary endpoints could show decay of opioid consumption, good patient satisfaction, and improvement of the quality of life. DISCUSSION The design of this study is potentially the most appropriate to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of radiosurgery for this new indication. New recommendations could be obtained in order to improve pain relief and quality of life.

scholarly journals Acupuncture for refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e030713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dacheng Li ◽  
Li Zhu ◽  
Daming Liu
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oesophageal Reflux ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Oesophageal Reflux Disease

IntroductionRefractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (rGORD) is a common disease, affecting patients’ quality of life. Since conventional medicines have limitations, like low effective rates and adverse events, acupuncture may be a promising therapy for rGORD. While no related systematic review has been published, the present study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for rGORD.Methods and analysisPubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese electronic databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang database, VIP, SinoMed and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, will be searched from establishment of the database to 31 August 2019. There will be no limitations on language, and all articles will be screened and collected by two reviewers independently. RevMan V.5.3.5 software will be used for meta-analysis, and the conduction of study will refer to the Cochrane Handbook for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol guidelines. The efficacy and safety of acupuncture for rGORD will be evaluated based on outcomes, including global symptom improvement, oesophageal sphincter function test measured by high-resolution manometry, quality of life, recurrence rate and adverse events.Ethics and disseminationThere is no necessity for this study to acquire an ethical approval, and this review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentation.Trial registration numberCRD42018111912.

scholarly journals Protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study of the efficacy and safety of nicotinamide in patients with Friedreich ataxia (NICOFA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Reetz ◽  
◽  
Ralf-Dieter Hilgers ◽  
Susanne Isfort ◽  
Marc Dohmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Friedreich Ataxia ◽  
Linear Mixed Effect Model ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Introduction Currently, no treatment that delays with the progression of Friedreich ataxia is available. In the majority of patients Friedreich ataxia is caused by homozygous pathological expansion of GAA repeats in the first intron of the FXN gene. Nicotinamide acts as a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Dose escalation studies have shown, that short term treatment with dosages of up to 4 g/day increase the expression of FXN mRNA and frataxin protein up to the levels of asymptomatic heterozygous gene carriers. The long-term effects and the effects on clinical endpoints, activities of daily living and quality of life are unknown. Methods The aim of the NICOFA study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of nicotinamide for the treatment of Friedreich ataxia over 24 months. An open-label dose adjustment wash-in period with nicotinamide (phase A: weeks 1–4) to the individually highest tolerated dose of 2–4 g nicotinamide/day will be followed by a 2 (nicotinamide group): 1 (placebo group) randomization (phase B: weeks 5–104). In the nicotinamide group, patients will continue with their individually highest tolerated dose between 2 and 4 g/d per os once daily and the placebo group patients will be receiving matching placebo. Safety assessments will consist of monitoring and recording of all adverse events and serious adverse events, regular monitoring of haematology, blood chemistry and urine values, regular measurement of vital signs and the performance of physical examinations including cardiological signs. The primary outcome is the change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) over time as compared with placebo in patients with Friedreich ataxia based on the linear mixed effect model (LMEM) model. Secondary endpoints are measures of quality of life, functional motor and cognitive measures, clinician’s and patient’s global impression-change scales as well as the up-regulation of the frataxin protein level, safety and survival/death. Perspective The NICOFA study represents one of the first attempts to assess the clinical efficacy of an epigenetic therapeutic intervention for this disease and will provide evidence of possible disease modifying effects of nicotinamide treatment in patients with Friedreich ataxia. Trial registration EudraCT-No.: 2017-002163-17, ClinicalTrials.govNCT03761511.

Ziv-aflibercept (Z) in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Interim safety data from the global aflibercept safety and quality-of-life program in pts pretreated with bevacizumab (B).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 556-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Raymond Ferry ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Roberto Bordonaro ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
The United States ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Initial Starting

556 Background: In the VELOUR study, adding Z (known as aflibercept outside the United States) to FOLFIRI resulted in improved OS, PFS, and RR in mCRC pts who had received prior oxaliplatin. Prior treatment with B (~30% of the ITT population) did not appear to impact the safety profile of Z. Results from VELOUR supported initiation of the global Aflibercept Safety and Quality-of-Life (QoL) Program composed of two clinical studies (ASQoP [NCT01571284]; AFEQT [NCT01670721]) to capture QoL and safety data from a population similar to that of VELOUR in a real-life setting. We report early safety data from this interim analysis in pts pretreated with B. Methods: ASQoP and AFEQT are single-arm, open-label trials evaluating safety and QoL of Z in mCRC pts previously treated with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. Eligible pts receive Z (4 mg/kg) q2wks on day 1 of each cycle followed by FOLFIRI until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or investigator/pt decision. Initial starting doses and subsequent modifications are at treating physicians’ discretion. The percentage of pts with grade (G) 3/4 adverse events (AEs) in the combined safety population of ASQoP and AFEQT in B-pretreated pts is compared with that of B-pretreated pts in VELOUR. Results: At data cut-off, the safety population comprised 116 pts with ≥1 completed treatment cycle; 67 (57.8%) were pretreated with B. At least 1 G3/4 AE was experienced by 49.3% of pts vs 82.5% in VELOUR. Most G3/4 AEs were G3. There were no reports of G4 hypertension or proteinuria. Conclusions: Thisinterim safety analysis from ASQoP/AFEQT in pts pretreated with B has identified no new safety signals for Z and a trend toward decreased incidence of G3/4 events. The early analysis provides additional safety data and suggests an acceptable toxicity profile in this real-life setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01571284. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of two Ayurvedic dosage forms for Allergic rhinitis: Study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Dahanayake ◽  
Pathirage Kamal Perera ◽  
P Galappaththy ◽  
D Samaranayake
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Dosage Forms ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Nasal Symptoms ◽  
Freeze Dried

Abstract Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an immune response of the nasal mucosa to airborne allergens and involves nasal congestion, watery nasal discharge, itching of the nose and sneezing. The symptoms of allergic rhinitis may significantly affect a patient’s quality of life and can be associated with conditions such as fatigue, headache, cognitive impairment and sleep disturbances. Various complementary and alternative medicine treatments have been used for this condition in clinical practice. The Ayurveda system of medicine is the most common complementary medicine system practiced in Sri Lanka. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of a decoction used in traditional Ayurveda for allergic rhinitis and it’s ready to use freeze dried formulation in comparison to an antihistamine over a period of 4 weeks on relief of symptoms in allergic rhinitis. Study design: This is a three arm, open label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolling patients with AR. Tamalakyadi decoction containing 12 ingredients (TMD12), used in traditional Ayurveda and its freeze dried formulation are the test products. The efficacy and safety of the two Ayurvedic dosage forms will be tested against the antihistamine loratidine Patients with symptoms of AR will be allocated randomly into the 3 arms after a 1 week run-in period and the medications will be given orally for 28 days. Total Nasal symptom Score (TNSS) of the patients will be used as the primary efficacy endpoint. TNSS will be recorded and compared between the 3 arms prior to visit 1, at the end of 28 days, end of the and second months of follow up. Symptom scores of daytime nasal symptoms, night time nasal symptoms, non-nasal symptoms and Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire are used as secondary end points. Discussion: This clinical trial will be able to provide evidence based scientific data on Ayurvedic dosage form, TMD12 and the freeze-dried formulation in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. This trial is expected to develop capacity to scientifically evaluate various Ayurvedic treatments that are claimed to have efficacy in treatment of various disease conditions. Trial registration:ISRCTN18149439 (06 May 2019) Keywords: Allergic rhinitis, Ayurvedic dosage forms, Tamalakyadi decoctions, Randomized controlled trial

scholarly journals Safety of Denervation Following Targeted Lung Denervation Therapy for COPD: AIRFLOW-1 Three-year Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Pison ◽  
Pallav Shah ◽  
Dirk-Jan Slebos ◽  
Vincent Ninane ◽  
Wim Janssens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Clinical Consequences

Abstract Background: Targeted lung denervation (TLD) is a novel bronchoscopic therapy that disrupts parasympathetic pulmonary nerve input to the lung reducing clinical consequences of cholinergic hyperactivity. The AIRFLOW-1 study assessed safety and TLD dose in patients with moderate-to-severe, symptomatic COPD. This analysis evaluated the long-term impact of TLD on COPD exacerbations, pulmonary function, and quality of life over three years of follow up.Methods: TLD was performed in a prospective, energy-level randomized (29 W vs 32 W power), multicenter study (NCT02058459). Additional patients were enrolled in an open label confirmation phase to confirm improved gastrointestinal safety after procedural modifications. Durability of TLD was evaluated at one, two, and three years post-treatment and assessed through analysis of COPD exacerbations, pulmonary lung function, and quality of life. Results: Three-year follow-up data were available for 73.9% of patients (n=34). The annualized rate of moderate to severe COPD exacerbations remained stable over the duration of the study. Lung function (FEV1, FVC, RV, and TLC) and quality of life (SGRQ-C and CAT) remained stable over three years of follow-up. No new gastrointestinal adverse events and no unexpected serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: TLD in COPD patients demonstrated a positive safety profile out to three years, with no late-onset serious adverse events related to denervation therapy. Clinical stability in lung function, quality of life, and exacerbations were observed in TLD treated patients over three years of follow up.

Erenumab (AMG 334) in episodic migraine

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1237-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
David Dodick ◽  
Peter J. Goadsby ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Stephen Silberstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Open Label Extension

Objective:To assess long-term safety and efficacy of anti–calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor erenumab in patients with episodic migraine (EM).Methods:Patients enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT01952574) who continued in an open-label extension (OLE) study will receive erenumab 70 mg every 4 weeks for up to 5 years. This preplanned interim analysis, conducted after all participants had completed the 1-year open-label follow-up, evaluated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and safety. Data reported as observed without imputation for missing data.Results:Of 472 patients enrolled in the parent study, 383 continued in the OLE with a median exposure to erenumab of 575 days (range 28–822 days). Mean (SD) MMD were 8.8 (2.6) at parent study baseline, 6.3 (4.2) at week 12 (beginning of OLE), and 3.7 (4.0) at week 64 (mean change from baseline [reduction] of 5.0 days). At week 64, 65%, 42%, and 26% achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in MMD, respectively. Mean HIT-6 scores were 60.2 (6.3) at baseline and 51.7 (9.2) at week 64. MSQ and MIDAS improvements from baseline were maintained through week 64. Safety profiles during the OLE were similar to those in the double-blind phase, which overall were similar to placebo.Conclusions:One-year efficacy, supported by functional improvements and favorable safety and tolerability profiles, supports further investigation of erenumab as a preventive treatment in patients with EM.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT01952574.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with episodic migraine, erenumab reduces long-term MMD and improves headache-related disability and migraine-specific quality of life.

scholarly journals Noninterventional Open-Label Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Ectoine Containing Nasal Spray in Comparison with Beclomethasone Nasal Spray in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Sonnemann ◽  
Marcus Möller ◽  
Andreas Bilstein
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Equivalence Test ◽  
Nasal Symptoms ◽  
Open Label Trial ◽  
Design And Methods

Objectives. The current study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a classical anti-inflammatory beclomethasone nasal spray in comparison to a physic-chemical stabilizing ectoine containing nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Design and Methods. This was a noninterventional, open-label, observational trial investigating the effects of beclomethasone or ectoine nasal spray on nasal symptoms and quality of life. Over a period of 14 days, patients were asked to daily document their symptoms. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by both physicians and patients. Results. Both treatments resulted in a significant decrease of TNSS values. An equivalence test could not confirm the noninferiority of ectoine treatment in comparison with beclomethasone treatment. Although clear symptom reduction was achieved with the ectoine products, the efficacy judgment showed possible advantages for the beclomethasone group. Importantly, tolerability results were comparably good in both groups, and a very low number of adverse events supported this observation. Both treatments resulted in a clear improvement in the quality of life as assessed by a questionnaire answered at the beginning and at the end of the trial. Conclusion. Taken together, it was shown that allergic rhinitis can be safely and successfully treated with beclomethasone and also efficacy and safety were shown for ectoine nasal spray.

Efficacy of proprietary Lactobacillus casei for anti-tuberculosis associated gastrointestinal adverse reactions in adult patients: a randomized, open-label, dose–response trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 370-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Lin ◽  
Shanliang Zhao ◽  
Jiahong Liu ◽  
Jianwen Zhang ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Lactobacillus Casei ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Gastrointestinal Adverse Events ◽  
Response Trial

Anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs can induce a series of gastrointestinal adverse events, which can seriously affect patients’ quality of life and may lead to treatment failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document