scholarly journals A Home Exercise Programme Is No More Beneficial than Advice and Education for People with Neurogenic Claudication: Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e72878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Comer ◽  
Anthony C. Redmond ◽  
Howard A. Bird ◽  
Elizabeth M. A. Hensor ◽  
Philip G. Conaghan
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Neurogenic Claudication ◽  
Home Exercise Programme ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Effect of exercise-based management on multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint: a pilot randomised controlled trial protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. e013083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A Warby ◽  
Jon J Ford ◽  
Andrew J Hahne ◽  
Lyn Watson ◽  
Simon Balster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Multidirectional Instability ◽  
Home Exercise Programme ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionThe most commonly recommended treatment for multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is exercise. Despite this recommendation, there is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of exercise. The aim of this paper is to describe a pilot randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of 2 exercise programmes on outcomes of participants with MDI.Methods and analysisConsenting participants between 12 and 35 years, with non-traumatic MDI will be randomly allocated to participate in either the Rockwood Instability programme or the Watson MDI programme. Both programmes involve 1 consultation per week for 12 weeks with a physiotherapist to prescribe and progress a home exercise programme. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Primary outcome measures include the Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score and Western Ontario Shoulder Index. Secondary outcomes include scapular coordinates, scapular upward rotation angles, muscle strength, symptomatic onset, limiting factor and angle of limiting factor in abduction range, incidence of complete glenohumeral joint dislocation, global rating of change, satisfaction scores, the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire, adverse events and compliance with the home exercise programme. Data will be analysed on intention-to-treat principles and a per protocol basis.DiscussionThis trial will evaluate whether there are differences in outcomes between the Rockwood and the Watson MDI programmes for participants with MDI.Ethics and disseminationParticipant confidentiality will be maintained with publication of results. Ethics approval: Faculty of Health Sciences (FHEC12/201).Trial registration numberACTRN12613001240730; Pre-results.

scholarly journals Can an online exercise prescription tool improve adherence to home exercise programmes in children with cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disabilities? A randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040108
Author(s):  
Rowan W Johnson ◽  
Sian A Williams ◽  
Daniel F Gucciardi ◽  
Natasha Bear ◽  
Noula Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disabilities ◽  
Home Exercise Programme ◽  
Exercise Programmes ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveDetermine the adherence to and effectiveness of an 8-week home exercise programme for children with disabilities delivered using Physitrack, an online exercise prescription tool, compared with traditional paper-based methods.DesignSingle-blinded, parallel-groups, randomised controlled trial (RCT).SettingIntervention took place in participants’ homes in Western Australia.ParticipantsChildren aged 6 to 17 years, with neurodevelopmental disabilities including cerebral palsy (CP), receiving community therapy services.InterventionAll participants completed an individualised home exercise programme, which was delivered to the intervention group using Physitrack and conventional paper-based methods for the control group.Primary outcome measuresAdherence to exercise programme, goal achievement and exercise performance.Secondary outcome measuresEnjoyment, confidence and usability of Physitrack.ResultsFifty-four participants with CP (n=37) or other neurodevelopmental disabilities (n=17) were recruited. Fifty-three were randomised after one early withdrawal. Forty-six completed the 8-week programme, with 24 in the intervention group and 22 in the control group. There was no difference between the two groups for percentage of exercises completed (intervention (n=22): 62.8% (SD 27.7), control (n=22): 55.8% (SD 19.4), between group mean difference −7.0% (95% CI: −21.6 to 7.5, p=0.34)). Both groups showed significant improvement in their self-rated performance of individualised goal activities, however there was no statistically significant difference between groups for goal achievement, quality of exercise performance, enjoyment, confidence or preferred method of delivery. There were no adverse events.ConclusionPhysitrack provides a therapist with a new means of providing an exercise programme with online tools such as exercise videos, but our preliminary findings indicate that it may be no better than a traditional paper-based method for improving exercise adherence or the other outcomes measured. Exercise programmes remain an intervention supported by evidence, but a larger RCT is required to fully evaluate online delivery methods.Trial registration detailsAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12616000743460.

Follow-up of a Wuqinxi exercise at home programme to reduce pain and improve function for knee osteoarthritis in older people: a randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Mei Xiao ◽  
Jing Jing LI ◽  
Yong Kang ◽  
Yong Chang Zhuang
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Home Exercise Programme ◽  
High Adherence ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Exercise therapy is a key intervention in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and recommended in international guidelines on KOA management. An effective home-exercise programme for frail older adults with KOA was successful in achieving high adherence. This randomised controlled trial was to compare the adherence to the exercise and lasting effects of follow-up 3 months. Methods Sixty-eight participants in the original Wuqinxi (WQX) exercise study were community dwelling older adults (age = 70.95 ± 9.85 years) with KOA were categorised into 34 controls group, 34 WQX group adherers. The Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire score (WOMAC) pain and Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, 6-min Walk Test, 30-s chair stand test, isokinetic muscle strength testing of knee flexion and extension measured at pre-test and post-test of the intervention period and follow-up for two groups. Results The WQX group maintained or improved in all nine measures from post-test to follow-up, whereas the control group significantly declined in WOMAC pain, Knee extensor strength and Knee flexor strength. Conclusion The WQX programme was an effective home-exercise programme that achieves high adherence in older adults with KOA who lived in these communities.

scholarly journals Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST) Trial: a randomised controlled trial of a combined physical and psychological intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication, a protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e022205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Williamson ◽  
Lesley Ward ◽  
Karan Vadher ◽  
Susan J Dutton ◽  
Ben Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Older People ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Neurogenic Claudication ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionNeurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis is common in older adults. The effectiveness of conservative interventions is not known. The aim of the study is to estimate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a physiotherapist-delivered, combined physical and psychological intervention.Methods and analysisThis is a pragmatic, multicentred, randomised controlled trial. Participants are randomised to a combined physical and psychological intervention (Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST) programme) or best practice advice (control). Community-dwelling adults, 65 years and over, with neurogenic claudication are identified from community and secondary care services. Recruitment is supplemented using a primary care-based cohort. Participants are registered prospectively and randomised in a 2:1 ratio (intervention:control) using a web-based service to ensure allocation concealment. The target sample size is a minimum of 402. The BOOST programme consists of an individual assessment and twelve 90 min classes, including education and discussion underpinned by cognitive behavioural techniques, exercises and walking circuit. During and after the classes, participants undertake home exercises and there are two support telephone calls to promote adherence with the exercises. Best practice advice is delivered in one to three individual sessions with a physiotherapist. The primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the 6 Minute Walk Test, Short Physical Performance Battery, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Gait Self-Efficacy Scale. Outcomes are measured at 6 and 12 months by researchers who are masked to treatment allocation. The primary statistical analysis will be by ‘intention to treat’. There is a parallel health economic evaluation and qualitative study.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was given on 3 March 2016 (National Research Ethics Committee number: 16/LO/0349). This protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist. The results will be reported at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. A plain English summary will be published on the BOOST website.Trial registration numberISRCTN12698674; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document