scholarly journals Prognostic Value, Clinicopathologic Features and Diagnostic Accuracy of Interleukin-8 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e0123484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjie Xia ◽  
Wuzhen Chen ◽  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
Dang Wu ◽  
Pin Wu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Daniel Sur ◽  
Claudia Burz ◽  
Shanthi Sabarimurugan ◽  
Alexandru Irimie

Although treatment options have improved, the survival and quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remain dismal. Therefore, significant biomarker prediction may help to improve colorectal cancer patient’s prognosis profile. MiRNAs have come as an option because of their essential role in cancer initiation and progression by regulating several molecular processes. MiR-150 has different roles in cancer, but its function in CRC is still ambiguous. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) research criteria by interrogating several databases in order to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of miR-150. Additionally, clinicalgov.org was scanned for possible trials. The literature was screened from inception to February 2020. A total of 12 out of 70 full-text articles were included in the meta-analysis. Among these, nine studies were included for diagnostic accuracy, and the remaining three were considered for prognostic significance of miR-150. With our results, miR-150 is an appropriate diagnostic biomarker, especially in serum and plasma, while the prognostic value of miR-150 was not statistically significant. The present study findings suggest that miR-150 has high specificity and sensitivity values as a potential diagnostic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e107013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Chen ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Wei-Min Li ◽  
Yu-Qiang Ji ◽  
Hao-Zhe Cao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 4009-4016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengpeng Yu ◽  
Haiting Wan ◽  
Renfeng Shan ◽  
Wu Wen ◽  
Jianfeng Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116
Author(s):  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Lizhen Dai ◽  
ZengXi Yang ◽  
XiChen Wang ◽  
Yin LanNing

Background: The prognostic value of Stathmin 1 (STMN1) in malignant solid tumors remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the potential value of STMN1 as a biomarker for predicting overall survival in patients with solid tumor. Methods: We systematically searched eligible studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from the establishment date of these databases to September 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association between STMN1 expression and overall survival. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4625 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our combined results showed that high STMN1 expression was associated with poor overall survival in solid tumors (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.55, 2.21). In general, our subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that our combined results were stable and reliable. However, from the results of the subgroups we found that high STMN1 expression was not related to overall survival in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer anymore, suggesting that much caution should be taken to interpret our combined result, and more studies with large sample sizes are required to further explore the prognostic value of STMN1 expression in the specific type of tumors, especially colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer. Conclusions: STMN1 could serve as a prognostic biomarker and could be developed as a valuable therapeutic target for patients with solid tumors. However, due to the limitations of the present meta-analysis, this conclusion should be taken with caution. Further studies adequately designed are required to confirm our findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document