scholarly journals Sibship Size and Gendered Resource Dilution in Different Societal Contexts

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e0160953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Kalmijn ◽  
Herman G. van de Werfhorst
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Botzet ◽  
Julia Marie Rohrer ◽  
Ruben C. Arslan

Few studies have examined birth order effects on personality in countries that are not Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD), even though theories have generally suggested interculturally universal family dynamics as the mechanism behind birth order effects, and prominent theories such as resource dilution would even predict stronger effects in poorer countries. Here, we investigate a subset of up to 11,188 participants of the Indonesian Family Life Survey, an ongoing representative panel study, to study whether later-born siblings differ from earlier-borns in intelligence, educational attainment, personality, and risk aversion. Analyses were performed using within-family designs in mixed-effects models. In model comparisons we tested for linear and non-linear birth order effects as well as for possible interactions of birth order and sibship size. Our estimated effect sizes are consistent with the emerging account of birth order as having relatively little impact on intelligence, education, personality, and risk aversion; and they exclude recent estimates from WEIRD populations based on large sample sizes. Thus, even the small effects of birth order reported in other studies appear to be culturally specific.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp M. Lersch

This study examines the association between sibship size and wealth in adulthood. The study draws on resource dilution theory and additionally discusses potentially wealth-enhancing consequences of having siblings. Data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP, N=3,502 individuals) are used to estimate multilevel regression models adjusted for parental wealth and other important confounders neglected in extant work. The main results of the current study show that additional siblings reduce wealth by about 27 to 39 percent. Parental wealth moderates the association so that sibship size is more negatively associated with filial wealth when parents are wealthier. Birth order position does not moderate the association between sibship size and wealth. The findings suggest that fertility in the family of origin has a systematic impact on wealth attainment and may contribute to population-level wealth inequalities independently from other socio-economic characteristics in families of origin such as parental wealth.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan-Yi Chen ◽  
Sunghun Kim ◽  
Elizabeth Pommier

1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S112
Author(s):  
R. M. Malina ◽  
C. M. Boncl ◽  
R. C. Ryan
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 670-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Strohschein ◽  
Anne H. Gauthier ◽  
Rachel Campbell ◽  
Clayton Kleparchuk

2021 ◽  
pp. 016402752110188
Author(s):  
Yifei Hou ◽  
Marissa Rurka ◽  
Siyun Peng

As Chinese households are becoming smaller with increasing numbers of adult children and older parents living apart, the extent to which patterns of parental support reflect traditional gender dynamics is under debate. Integrating theories of sibling compensation with ceremonial giving, we tested whether helping non-coresident parents in China is affected by sibship size and how these patterns depend on own and sibling(s)’ gender using a sample of 4,359 non-coresident parent-child dyads nesting within 3,285 focal adult children from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2013. Opposite to patterns in the United States and Europe, we found substitutions of daughters with sons—having more brothers was associated with daughters’ reduced probabilities and hours of helping. Sons’ patterns of helping were independent of number of brothers and sisters in the family, consistent with the theory of ceremonial giving. These findings reflect the dominance of traditional family dynamics despite changes in family structure.


1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas B. Downey ◽  
Brian Powell ◽  
Lala Carr Steelman ◽  
Shana Pribesh

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Simanko ◽  
Ben Rimmer ◽  
Thomas Victor Pollet

Middleborns have been argued to be the neglected birth order. The present study aimed to test whether the emotional closeness to parents, siblings or friends differed between middleborns and otherborns, across two different datasets. Using a between family design this study accounted for gender, nationality, educational attainment, age and sibship size via matching. We found no evidence to suggest that middleborns differ from otherborns in familial sentiment. The sign of closeness to friends was in the opposite direction than predicted, with middleborns being less close than other birth orders. The findings are discussed with reference to current literature on birth order and familial sentiment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document