scholarly journals Yeast species isolated from Texas High Plains vineyards and dynamics during spontaneous fermentations of Tempranillo grapes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0216246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Bougreau ◽  
Kenia Ascencio ◽  
Marie Bugarel ◽  
Kendra Nightingale ◽  
Guy Loneragan
Keyword(s):  
Yeast Species ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Texas High Plains ◽  
Spontaneous Fermentations

Persistence of the Glandless Genotype in a Composite Cross of Upland Cotton on the Texas High Plains 1

Crop Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 883-884
Author(s):  
J. E. Quisenberry ◽  
L. L. Ray ◽  
D. R. Rummel
Keyword(s):  
Upland Cotton ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Texas High Plains

Irrigation Management Effects on Crop Water Productivity for Maize Production in the Texas High Plains

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Gary W. Marek ◽  
Thomas H. Marek ◽  
Steven R. Evett ◽  
Yong Chen ◽  
Kevin R. Heflin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Productivity ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Maize Production ◽  
Crop Water Productivity ◽  
Texas High Plains ◽  
Management Effects

Forage Potential of Pearl Millet and Forage Sorghum Alternatives to Corn under the Water-Limiting Conditions of the Texas High Plains: A Review

cftm ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 190058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bishwoyog Bhattarai ◽  
Sukhbir Singh ◽  
Charles P. West ◽  
Rupinder Saini
Keyword(s):  
Pearl Millet ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Forage Sorghum ◽  
Texas High Plains

Modeling climate change impacts on blue, green, and grey water footprints and crop yields in the Texas High Plains, USA

2021 ◽  
Vol 310 ◽  
pp. 108649
Author(s):  
Yong Chen ◽  
Gary W. Marek ◽  
Thomas H. Marek ◽  
Dana O. Porter ◽  
David K. Brauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Crop Yields ◽  
Climate Change Impacts ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Grey Water ◽  
Texas High Plains

Optimal Field Partitioning for Center-Pivot-Irrigated Cotton in the Texas High Plains

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Nair ◽  
Stephan Maas ◽  
Chenggang Wang ◽  
Steven Mauget
Keyword(s):  
High Plains ◽  
Texas High Plains ◽  
Center Pivot

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Response to Lactofen at Various Postemergence Timings1

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Dotray ◽  
W. J. Grichar ◽  
T. A. Baughman ◽  
E. P. Prostko ◽  
T. L. Grey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arachis Hypogaea ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Application Timing ◽  
Texas High Plains ◽  
Arachis Hypogaea L ◽  
Seed Fill ◽  
Preharvest Interval

Abstract Field experiments were conducted at nine locations in Texas and Georgia in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate peanut tolerance to lactofen. Lactofen at 220 g ai/ha plus crop oil concentrate was applied to peanut at 6 leaf (lf), 6 lf followed by (fb) 15 days after the initial treatment (DAIT), 15 DAIT alone, 6 lf fb 30 DAIT, 30 DAIT alone, 6 lf fb 45 DAIT, 45 DAIT alone, 6 lf fb 60 DAIT, and 60 DAIT alone in weed-free plots. Lactofen caused visible leaf bronzing at all locations. Yield loss was observed when applications were made 45 DAIT, a timing that would correspond to plants in the R5 (beginning seed) to R6 (full seed) stage of growth. At all locations except the Texas High Plains, this application timing was within the 90 d preharvest interval. Growers who apply lactofen early in the peanut growing season to small weeds should have confidence that yields will not be negatively impacted despite dramatic above-ground injury symptoms; however, applications made later in the season, during seed fill, may adversely affect yield.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document