scholarly journals A brief home-based palliative care learning experience for medical students and resident doctors in Okinawa, Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e0218780
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nagano ◽  
Haruo Obara ◽  
Yoshihiro Takayama
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. PCRT.S9383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanya Srisawat ◽  
Temsak Phungrassami

Objective To evaluate the final-year medical students’ perception of their competencies related to palliative care. Materials and Methods Two consecutive anonymous surveys at 6 and 12 months among 6th-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. Results One hundred and ten (66%) and 103 (62%) students completed the questionnaires at 6 and 12 months, respectively. With the criteria that at least 80% of them should be confident to manage the cases independently or under supervision, they perceived themselves to be good at holistic care and communication skills, but lacking in common symptoms management and ethical aspects. The common promoting factors and barriers for their learning experiences were reported. Conclusion This study identified many aspects necessary to improve the students’ learning experience in our compulsory longitudinal integrated palliative care curriculum.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn D. Stepanyan ◽  
Timothy E. Weiss ◽  
Antonio M. Pessegueiro ◽  
Christopher J. Pietras

Background: Although palliative care is recognized as an important component of medical school curricula, the content and structure of education in the field is variable and often lacks outpatient exposure. We aimed to develop and implement a palliative care clinical elective for fourth-year medical students incorporating both inpatient and outpatient learning. Methods: Fourteen medical students participated in a palliative care elective which included 2 weeks on an inpatient consult service and 1 week of outpatient clinic and home hospice visits. The elective was evaluated using a focus group and previously validated surveys assessing self-rated competency and attitudes toward caring for palliative care patients. Data were analyzed using paired t tests to compare survey response means before and after the elective. Results: Of the 14 participating students, 7 completed both the pre- and postelective surveys. Significant improvements in self-rated competency were seen in pain and symptom management ( P < .001), communication ( P < .001), and advance care planning ( P < .01). Survey results also showed improvement in attitudes toward caring for dying patients ( P < .001), with lower scores at the end of the elective suggesting reduced emotional distress. Although the outpatient component was hypothesized to be a major benefit of the curriculum, qualitative data revealed the most highly valued component to be direct observation and feedback during inpatient time. Conclusion: Given the highlighted importance of direct observation and feedback as a unique and powerful learning experience, future work should be targeted toward enhancing the quality and timeliness of feedback delivered by the palliative care interdisciplinary team.


Author(s):  
Valeria Cardenas ◽  
Anna Rahman ◽  
Yujun Zhu ◽  
Susan Enguidanos

Background: Despite some insurance plans now paying for home-based palliative care, recent reports have suggested that insurance coverage for palliative care may be insufficient in expanding patient access to home-based palliative care. Aim: To identify patients’ and caregivers’ perceived barriers to home-based palliative care and their recommendations for overcoming these barriers. Design: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews. Our interview protocol elicited participants’ perspectives on home-based palliative care services; positive and negative aspects of the palliative program explanation; and suggestions for improving messaging around home-based palliative care. Setting/Participants: Twenty-five participants (patients, proxies, and their caregivers) who were eligible for a randomized controlled trial of home-based palliative care were interviewed by telephone. Results: Themes related to home-based palliative care referral barriers included reluctance to have home visits, enrollment timing, lack of palliative care knowledge, misconceptions about palliative care, and patients’ self-perceived health condition. Themes related to recommendations for overcoming these obstacles included ensuring that palliative care referrals come from healthcare providers or insurance companies and presenting palliative care services more clearly. Conclusion: Findings reinforce the need for additional palliative care education among patients with serious illness (and their caregivers) and the importance of delivering palliative care information and referrals from trusted sources.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad J. Torabi ◽  
Harvey Feigenbaum ◽  
Pantila V. Bateman

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921632097927
Author(s):  
Jiaoli Cai ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Denise Guerriere ◽  
Peter C Coyte

Background: Understanding the determinants of the intensity of informal care may assist policy makers in the identification of supports for informal caregivers. Little is known about the utilization of informal care throughout the palliative care trajectory. Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze the intensity and determinants of the use of informal care among cancer patients over the palliative care trajectory. Design: This was a longitudinal, prospective cohort design conducted in Canada. Regression analysis using instrumental variables was applied. Setting/participants: From November 2013 to August 2017, a total of 273 caregivers of cancer patients were interviewed biweekly over the course of the care recipient’s palliative care trajectory. The outcome was the number of hours of informal care provided by unpaid caregivers, that is, hours of informal care. Results: The number of hours of informal care increased as patients approached death. Home-based nursing care complemented, and hence, increased the provision of informal care. Patients living alone and caregivers who were employed were associated with the provision of fewer hours of informal care. Spousal caregivers provided more hours of informal care. Patient’s age, sex, and marital status, and caregiver’s age, sex, marital status, and education were associated with the number of hours of informal care. Conclusions: The intensity of informal care was determined by predisposing, enabling, and needs-based factors. This study provides a reference for the planning and targeting of supports for the provision of informal care.


Author(s):  
Holly R. Cherniwchan

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for end-of-life services and bereavement support, and in many areas of the world, in-person palliative care is struggling to meet these needs. Local infection control measures result in limited visitation rights in hospital and patients are often dying alone. For many years, virtual platforms have been used as a validated alternative to in-person consults for outpatient and home-based palliative care; however, the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual inpatient equivalent is less studied. Virtual inpatient palliative care may offer a unique opportunity for patients to have meaningful interactions with their care team and family while isolated in hospital or in hospice. This narrative review examines strategies employed during the COVID-19 pandemic to implement virtual palliative care services in the inpatient setting. Five key themes were identified in the literature between January 2020-March 2021 in the LitCovid NCBI database: 1) overall acceptability of virtual inpatient palliative care during the pandemic, 2) important logistical considerations when developing a virtual inpatient palliative care platform, 3) commonly used technologies for delivering virtual services, 4) strategies for harnessing human resources to meet increased patient volume, and 5) challenges of virtual inpatient palliative care implementation. Upon review, telepalliative care can meet the increased demand for safe and accessible inpatient palliative care during a pandemic; however, in some circumstances in-person services should still be considered. The decision for which patients receive what format of care—in-person or virtual—should be decided on a case-by-case basis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document