scholarly journals Gestational weight gain and its effect on birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0231889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fekede Asefa ◽  
Allison Cummins ◽  
Yadeta Dessie ◽  
Andrew Hayen ◽  
Maralyn Foureur
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e033130
Author(s):  
Yamei Yu ◽  
Isabelle Hardy ◽  
Wenguang Sun ◽  
Dean A Fergusson ◽  
William Fraser ◽  
...  

IntroductionInappropriate gestational weight gain (GWG), including inadequate and excessive GWG, has become pandemic across nations and continents. This review aims to synthesise the evidence on the correlation between diet quality and GWG. If this association is confirmed, improving diet quality could become an intervention target in the efforts to reduce inappropriate GWG.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic review of all prospective cohort studies on diet quality in preconception or pregnancy and GWG. Our secondary outcomes include gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and birth weight. A comprehensive search of all published articles in MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Food Science and Technology Abstracts (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCOHost), from database creation to 20 April 2019, will be conducted. Studies will be screened for eligibility by title, abstract and full text in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results will be reported following the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted to synthesise the effect size reported as OR with 95% CI using both fixed-effect and random-effect models. I2 statistics and visual inspection of the forest plots will be used to assess heterogeneity and identify the potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias will be assessed by visual inspections of funnel plots and Egger’s test.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. We aim to publish the results of this study in a peer-reviewed journal and present them at conferences and scientific meetings to promote knowledge transfer.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019128732


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Kominiarek ◽  
Adam K. Lewkowitz ◽  
Ebony Carter ◽  
Susan A. Fowler ◽  
Melissa Simon

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Faucher ◽  
M Hastings-Tolsma ◽  
JJ Song ◽  
DS Willoughby ◽  
S Gerding Bader

2019 ◽  
Vol 300 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akilew A. Adane ◽  
Carrington C. J. Shepherd ◽  
Faye J. Lim ◽  
Scott W. White ◽  
Brad M. Farrant ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0252247
Author(s):  
Samson Gebremedhin ◽  
Tilahun Bekele

Background Inadequate or excess gestational weight gain (GWG) leads to multiple undesirable birth outcomes. Yet, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) little is known about the weight gain pattern in pregnancy. The purpose of the study is to estimate the average gestational weight gain (GWG) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and to examined whether there had been recent improvements or not. Methods Based on cross-sectional anthropometric data extracted from multiple Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in SSA, we estimated the average GWG in the region. Pseudo-cohort design was used to reconstruct GWG trajectories based on aggregated data of 110,482 women extracted from 30 recent surveys. Trend in GWG between 2000 and 2015 was determined using the data of 11 SSA countries. Pre-pregnancy weight was estimated based on the weight of non-pregnant women at risk of conception. Results On average, women in SSA gain inadequate weight (6.6 kg, 95% confidence interval, 6.0–7.2) over pregnancy. No meaningful gain was observed in the first trimester; whereas, women in the second and third trimesters put on 2.2 and 3.2 kg, respectively. The highest weight gain (10.5, 8.2–12.9 kg) was observed in Southern African sub-region and the lowest in Western Africa (5.8, 5.0–6.6 kg). The GWG among women who had secondary or above education (9.5, 8.2–10.9 kg) was higher than women with lower education (5.0, 4.3–5.8 kg). Likewise, GWG in women from richest households (9.0, 7.2–10.7 kg) was superior to those from poorest households (6.1, 5.3–7.0 kg). The estimated recent (2015–20) mean GWG (6.6, 5.8–7.4 kg) was not significantly different from what had been at beginning of the new millennium (6.7, 5.9–7.5 kg). Conclusion In SSA GWG is extremely low and is not showing improvements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document