scholarly journals Refractive stability of a new single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens and corneal wound repair after implantation using a new automated intraocular lens delivery system

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0238366
Author(s):  
Kazuno Negishi ◽  
Sachiko Masui ◽  
Hidemasa Torii ◽  
Yasuyo Nishi ◽  
Kazuo Tsubota
2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1081-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aabid M. Farukhi ◽  
Liliana Werner ◽  
Justin C. Kohl ◽  
Gareth L. Gardiner ◽  
Joshua R. Ford ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
Banu Acar ◽  
Isil M. Torun ◽  
Suphi Acar

Background: Advancements in cataract surgery have necessitated the availability of intraocular lens preloaded delivery systems that can safely, effectively and predictably deliver IOLs in the eye. Preloaded delivery systems simplify and reduce procedural variability during surgery preparation. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical acceptability, delivery characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with new generation hydrophobic acrylic Intraocular Lens with Preloaded delivery system. Methods: This was a single centre retrospective study. Total 41 patients were enrolled in the study to get at least 38 patients for evaluation. All patients were assessed on day1 and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: EYECRYL-SERT showed ‘excellent’ ease of insertion and handling in all 41(100%) patients. Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) improved from 0.74±0.58 logMAR during screening to 0.03±0.04 logMAR 6 months after surgery. The Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (CIVA) and Corrected Near Visual Acuity (CNVA) were 0.10±0.04 and 0.01±0.02 logMAR post 6 months surgery, respectively. The refractive spherical equivalence was -1.94±2.51 D during screening, which improved significantly (p=0.0018) to -0.21±0.47 D post 6 months surgery. The low and high contrast sensitivity was 0.06±0.06 and -0.05±0.06 logMAR after 6 months surgery, respectively. The endothelial cell loss was 5.67%, 7.22% and 9.75% at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, respectively, as compared to screening. None of the subjects reported any adverse event during the study period. Conclusion: The IOL delivery system (EYECRYL_SERT) provided desired delivery characteristics during cataract surgery and was effective in improving clinical outcomes in cataract patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 800-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Weinand ◽  
Annette Jung ◽  
Alexandra Stein ◽  
Andreas Pfützner ◽  
Ralph Becker ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schartmüller ◽  
Sabine Schriefl ◽  
Luca Schwarzenbacher ◽  
Christina Leydolt ◽  
Rupert Menapace

BackgroundTo evaluate rotation and its influencing factors of an aspheric one-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) Vivinex XY1 during 6 months after operation.MethodsIn this institutional trial, 122 eyes of 66 patients were implanted with a non-toric aspheric IOL Vivinex XY1 (Hoya Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). IOL alignment was assessed at the end of surgery, 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after implantation. Confounding factors such as axial length, presence of anterior fibrosis and randomised implantation in four different intended axes (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°) were evaluated. Decentration and tilt were measured using a Purkinje metre.ResultsAssessment of rotational stability was possible for 103 of 122 implanted IOLs 6 months after eye surgery. The median absolute rotation was 1.1° (range: 0°–5°). Rotation was significantly increased within the first hour after operation compared with later time-points (p<0.001). No correlation was found with axial length and rotation (Spearman’s r=0.048, p=0.63). No significant difference was observed regarding different implantation axes (p=0.75). Rotation was not influenced by the presence of anterior fibrosis (p=0.98).ConclusionAssessing the true IOL position at the end of surgery is crucial for the evaluation of rotational stability of IOLs. No IOL rotation exceeding 5° could be detected 6 months after surgery.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1827-1832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Ollerton ◽  
Liliana Werner ◽  
Stanley R. Fuller ◽  
Shaheen C. Kavoussi ◽  
Steele J. McIntyre ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1821-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. SooHoo ◽  
Stephen S. Lane ◽  
Robert J. Cionni ◽  
John P. Berdahl ◽  
Glenn R. Sussman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document