scholarly journals A meta-analysis of cohort studies: Traumatic brain injury and risk of Alzheimer’s Disease

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253206
Author(s):  
Jieyu Zhang ◽  
Yongkang Zhang ◽  
Juntao Zou ◽  
Fei Cao

Introduction Recently, some epidemiological studies have reported that cognitive disorders in elderly people is accelerated with traumatic brain injury. But the causal relationship between traumatic brain injury and AD is still an area of controversy. Aims Our review was conducted to estimate the relation between traumatic brain injury and risk of AD. Methods All longitudinal population-based studies comparing incidence of AD between subjects with and without traumatic brain injury from their inception to September 2020 were searched in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science without restriction of language. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results A total of 17 studies involving 4289,548 individuals were included. After pooling these 17 studies, subjects with traumatic brain injury had significant higher incidence of AD than those without traumatic brain injury (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05–1.29). When considering the severity of traumatic brain injury, this elevated risk of AD was still significant comparing subjects with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury and those with no traumatic brain injury (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01–1.59). Conclusion Traumatic brain injury, especially moderate and severe traumatic brain injury may be associated with increased risk of AD.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Wang ◽  
Mingwei Sun ◽  
Hua Jiang ◽  
Xiao-ping Cao ◽  
Jun Zeng

Abstract Background We aimed to systematically review the efficacy of mannitol (MTL) on patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods Databases such as PubMed (US National Library of Medicine), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 3), ISI (Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded), Chinese Biomedicine Database (CBM), and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI) have been searched for relevant studies published between 1 January 2003 and 1 October 2014. We have established inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify RCTs, which were suitable to be enrolled in the systematic review. The comparison group could be hypertonic saline (HS), hydroxyethyl starch, or others. The quality assessment was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 and modified Jadad score scale. The major outcome was mortality, followed by the secondary outcomes such as neurological outcome, days on intensive care unit (ICU), and ventilator day. In addition, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were used as the surrogate endpoints. Data synthesis and meta-analysis was conducted by using R (version 3.7-0.). Results When 176 potential relevant literatures and abstracts have been screened, four RCTs met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for the meta-analysis. Amongst all the enrolled studies, two trials have provided the primary outcome data. There was no heterogeneity between two studies (I2 = 0 %) and a fixed model was used for meta-analysis (n = 53), pooled result indicated that the mortality was similar in mannitol intervention and control treatment, OR = 0.80, 95 % CI [0.27, 2.37], P = 0.38. We found that both mannitol and HS were efficient in decreasing the ICP. Furthermore, the effect of the HS on the ICP appeared to be more effective in the patients with diffuse brain injuries than mannitol did. Conclusions As a conclusion, the mannitol therapy cannot reduce the mortality risk of acute severe traumatic brain injury. Current evidence does not support the mannitol as an effective treatment of acute severe traumatic brain injury. The well-designed randomized controlled trials are in urgent need to demonstrate the adoption of mannitol to acute severe traumatic brain injury.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongjing Lin ◽  
Shouyue Huang ◽  
Jun Sun ◽  
Bing Xie ◽  
Yisheng Zhong

Background. Previous studies exploring the association between toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) polymorphisms and open angle glaucoma (OAG) presented inconsistent results. We aimed to investigate the association between TLR4 polymorphisms and OAG. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library up to 31 December 2018. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated, followed by stratification analyses according to ethnicity and glaucoma subtype. Results. TLR4 rs7037117 polymorphism had significant associations with increased risk of OAG in allelic model (OR=1.25; 95%CI: 1.09-1.44; P=0.002) and recessive model (OR=1.49; 95%CI: 1.08-2.04; P=0.01). With regard to rs10759930, rs12377632, and rs2149356, the results showed significant increased risks in all genetic models (all P<0.05), whereas, for rs1927914, rs11536889, and rs7045953, no significant associations were identified in any genetic model (all P>0.05). Furthermore, the association of rs1927911 with OAG risk was found to be significant in recessive model (OR=1.34; 95%CI: 1.06-1.71; P=0.02). As for rs4986790 and rs4986791, meta-analyses were not performed due to the limited number of studies and the ethnic differences. Subgroup analysis indicated that the above polymorphisms with significant differences might increase the susceptibility in POAG patients. As for the ethnicity, rs7037117, rs10759930, and rs1927911 might increase the risk in Asians, while rs12377632 and rs2149356 might increase the risk in Asians and Mexicans. Conclusion. The meta-analysis highlighted that certain mutations of some TLR4 polymorphisms might increase the susceptibility of OAG. However, TLR4 polymorphisms are still far from being candidate genetic biomarkers for OAG. Additional researches involving larger scale epidemiological studies are warranted to validate our results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyong Zheng ◽  
Dan Duan ◽  
Jianguo Xu ◽  
Xing Wang ◽  
Yonggui Ge ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although many studies have shown that erythropoietin plays an important role in the prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, the effective dose of erythropoietin has not been clearly defined. Our aim was to systematically elucidate the safety and efficacy of erythropoietin administration regimens in TBI patients.Methods: Data search included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published before December, 2020, updated to June 2021. Network meta-analysis was performed when sufficient comparable evidence was available, and CINeMA tool was used to evaluated the quality of our evidence.Results: A total of 6 RCTs involving 981 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. All studies assessed the effect of erythropoietin on mortality. Erythropoietin reduced the mortality rate in patients with TBI, and the risk of death decreased with increasing dose, but the difference was not statistically significant (odd ratio of 12,000u vs Placebo=0.98, 95%CI, 0.03-40.34; odd ratio of group 30,000u vs Placebo=0.56, 95%CI, 0.06-5.88; odd ratio of 40,000u vs Placebo=0.35, 95%CI, 0.01-9.43; odd ratio of 70,000u vs Placebo=0.29, 95%CI, 0.01-9.26; odd ratio of group 80,000u vs Placebo=0.22, 95%CI, 0.00-7.45). Three studies involving 739 patients showed that erythropoietin did not increase the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with TBI. However, the risk tended to rise as the dose increases. Two studies demonstrated that erythropoietin did not increase the incidence of pulmonary embolism. The evidential quality of all the results of the evidence ranged from low to medium.Conclusion: Although the efficacy of erythropoietin was not statistically demonstrated, we found a trend in the association of erythropoietin dose with reduced mortality and increased embolic events in TBI patients. We are looking forward to more high-quality original studies focusing on the dose and timing of erythropoietin for the treatment of TBI, in order to obtain stronger evidence on the optimal erythropoietin dose.Study Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021272500).


Author(s):  
David Shepetovsky ◽  
Gianluca Mezzini ◽  
Lorenzo Magrassi

AbstractDespite being a common procedure, cranioplasty (CP) is associated with a variety of serious, at times lethal, complications. This study explored the relationship between the initial injury leading to decompressive craniectomy (DC) and the rates and types of complications after subsequent CP. It specifically compared between traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and patients undergoing CP after DC for other indications.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using PRISMA guidelines was performed to include case-control studies, cohorts, and clinical trials reporting complication data for CP after DC. Information about the patients’ characteristics and the rates of overall and specific complications in TBI and non-TBI patients was extracted, summarized, and analyzed.A total of 59 studies, including the authors’ institutional experience, encompassing 9264 patients (4671 TBI vs. 4593 non-TBI) met the inclusion criteria; this total also included 149 cases from our institutional series. The results of the analysis of the published series are shown both with and without our series 23 studies reported overall complications, 40 reported infections, 10 reported new-onset seizures, 13 reported bone flap resorption (BFR), 5 reported post-CP hydrocephalus, 10 reported intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 8 reported extra-axial fluid collections (EFC). TBI was associated with increased odds of BFR (odds ratio [OR] 1.76, p < 0.01) and infection (OR 1.38, p = 0.02). No difference was detected in the odds of overall complications, seizures, hydrocephalus, ICH, or EFC.Awareness of increased risks of BFR and infection after CP in TBI patients promotes the implementation of new strategies to prevent these complications especially in this category of patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110042
Author(s):  
Grace Mary Turner ◽  
Christel McMullan ◽  
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽  
Danai Bem ◽  
Tom Marshall ◽  
...  

Aims To investigate the association between TBI and stroke risk. Summary of review We undertook a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library from inception to 4th December 2020. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool hazard ratios (HR) for studies which reported stroke risk post-TBI compared to controls. Searches identified 10,501 records; 58 full texts were assessed for eligibility and 18 met the inclusion criteria. The review included a large sample size of 2,606,379 participants from four countries. Six studies included a non-TBI control group, all found TBI patients had significantly increased risk of stroke compared to controls (pooled HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.46-2.37). Findings suggest stroke risk may be highest in the first four months post-TBI, but remains significant up to five years post-TBI. TBI appears to be associated with increased stroke risk regardless of severity or subtype of TBI. There was some evidence to suggest an association between reduced stroke risk post-TBI and Vitamin K antagonists and statins, but increased stroke risk with certain classes of antidepressants. Conclusion TBI is an independent risk factor for stroke, regardless of TBI severity or type. Post-TBI review and management of risk factors for stroke may be warranted.


Author(s):  
Johannes C. Vester ◽  
Anca D. Buzoianu ◽  
Stefan I. Florian ◽  
Volker Hömberg ◽  
Se-Hyuk Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
William A. Florez-Perdomo ◽  
Edgar Felipe Laiseca Torres ◽  
Sergio a Serrato ◽  
Tariq Janjua ◽  
Andrei F. Joaquim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Schwartz Hvingelby ◽  
Carsten Bjarkam ◽  
Frantz Rom Poulsen ◽  
Tiit Illimar Mathiesen ◽  
Morten Thingemann Bøtker ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e020062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaosu Bai ◽  
Zhiming Liu ◽  
Zhisen Li ◽  
Dewen Yan

ObjectivesSeveral patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have depressive disorders. Whether insulin treatment was associated with increased risk of depression remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association of insulin therapy and depression.DesignA meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 2016. Epidemiological studies comparing the prevalence of depression between insulin users and non-insulin users were included. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The adjusted and crude data were analysed.ResultsTwenty-eight studies were included. Of these, 12 studies presented with adjusted ORs. Insulin therapy was significantly associated with increased risk of depression (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.76, p=0.003). Twenty-four studies provided crude data. Insulin therapy was also associated with an odds for developing depression (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.80, p<0.001). When comparing insulin therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs, significant association was observed for adjusted (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.86, p=0.008) and crude (OR=1.61, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.93, p<0.001) data.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis confirmed that patients on insulin therapy were significantly associated with the risk of depressive symptoms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document