scholarly journals The limits of personalization in precision medicine: Polygenic risk scores and racial categorization in a precision breast cancer screening trial

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258571
Author(s):  
Jennifer Elyse James ◽  
Leslie Riddle ◽  
Barbara Ann Koenig ◽  
Galen Joseph

Population-based genomic screening is at the forefront of a new approach to disease prevention. Yet the lack of diversity in genome wide association studies and ongoing debates about the appropriate use of racial and ethnic categories in genomics raise key questions about the translation of genomic knowledge into clinical practice. This article reports on an ethnographic study of a large pragmatic clinical trial of breast cancer screening called WISDOM (Women Informed to Screen Depending On Measures of Risk). Our ethnography illuminates the challenges of using race or ethnicity as a risk factor in the implementation of precision breast cancer risk assessment. Our analysis provides critical insights into how categories of race, ethnicity and ancestry are being deployed in the production of genomic knowledge and medical practice, and key challenges in the development and implementation of novel Polygenic Risk Scores in the research and clinical applications of this emerging science. Specifically, we show how the conflation of social and biological categories of difference can influence risk prediction for individuals who exist at the boundaries of these categories, affecting the perceptions and practices of scientists, clinicians, and research participants themselves. Our research highlights the potential harms of practicing genomic medicine using under-theorized and ambiguous categories of race, ethnicity, and ancestry, particularly in an adaptive, pragmatic trial where research findings are applied in the clinic as they emerge. We contribute to the expanding literature on categories of difference in post-genomic science by closely examining the implementation of a large breast cancer screening study that aims to personalize breast cancer risk using both common and rare genomic markers.

2020 ◽  
pp. canprevres.0154.2020
Author(s):  
Julian O. Kim ◽  
Daniel J. Schaid ◽  
Celine M. Vachon ◽  
Andrew Cooke ◽  
Fergus J. Couch ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel J.W. Greuter ◽  
Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide ◽  
Cathrien E. Jacobi ◽  
Jan C. Oosterwijk ◽  
Liesbeth Jansen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 938-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Ahern ◽  
Brian L. Sprague ◽  
Michael C.S. Bissell ◽  
Diana L. Miglioretti ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathijs C. Goossens ◽  
Isabel De Brabander ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
Evelien Vaes ◽  
Chantal Van Ongeval ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Weang-Kee Ho ◽  
Mei-Chee Tai ◽  
Joe Dennis ◽  
Xiang Shu ◽  
Jingmei Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document