scholarly journals Philosophy evolution of the dose limitation system and the issue of replacements in the “superseded” publications

Author(s):  
F. Correa ◽  
et. al.
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Robert W McConkey ◽  
Maura Dowling

Nurse referrers of medical ionising radiation (X-ray) are educated to refer appropriately. One particular cohort of patients who warrant special consideration regarding the risks associated with X-ray are individuals of childbearing age. In the context of advanced nurse practitioner practice in urology, these patients attend for removal of ureteric stents and may require an abdominal X-ray. In reaching a decision, ANPs undertake a systematic assessment considering the individual's pregnancy status, as an X-ray of the abdomen, although low dose, carries a much higher risk of teratogenic effects than an X-ray of the extremities. This article considers the risks of ionising radiation in individuals of childbearing age, while paying attention to legislation and the application of the principles of justification, optimisation and dose limitation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Eugenio Magnabosco Neto ◽  
Fernando Henrique Westphalen

Introduction: The side effects and adverse reactions related to cancer therapies may cause significant alterations in the oral cavity, discomfort or even severe pain in parts of the body, patient’s nutritional deficiency, delay in the administration of oncologic drugs or dose limitation, an increase of hospitalization time and of the related expenses, as well as a decrease in the patient’s quality of life. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the deleterious effects of cancer therapies in the oral cavity. Material and methods: Data was gathered from medical records of the treatment of 643 cancer patients at the São José Hospital, in Joinville, state of Santa Catarina, from January to September 2012. Among the records selected for this study, 59.41% were female patients, with a mean age of 51 to 60 years. Results: Oral complications were reported in 72.47% of the patients, and the complication with the highest prevalence was mucositis (14.62%) followed by dry mouth (10.58%). Most of the patients had not received dental care prior to the cancer treatment, and no dental record was found. Conclusions: Several different oral disorders were reported as a result of cancer treatment, and a significant number of patients needed dental evaluation prior to the treatment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Kozłowska ◽  
Agnieszka Łacka ◽  
Roman Krawczyk ◽  
Radosław J. Kozłowski

2002 ◽  
Vol 178 (8) ◽  
pp. 422-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wiegel ◽  
Dirk Bottke ◽  
Patrick Bandlow ◽  
Ursula Steiner ◽  
Wolfgang Hinkelbein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document