scholarly journals Airborne laser scanning based forest inventory for forest management by applying novel metrics and multiple data source

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (193) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inka Pippuri
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Rahlf ◽  
Marius Hauglin ◽  
Rasmus Astrup ◽  
Johannes Breidenbach

Abstract Key message Large-scale forest resource maps based on national forest inventory (NFI) data and airborne laser scanning may facilitate synergies between NFIs and forest management inventories (FMIs). A comparison of models used in such a NFI-based map and a FMI indicate that NFI-based maps can directly be used in FMIs to estimate timber volume of mature spruce forests. Context Traditionally, FMIs and NFIs have been separate activities. The increasing availability of detailed NFI-based forest resource maps provides the possibility to eliminate or reduce the need of field sample plot measurements in FMIs if their accuracy is similar. Aims We aim to (1) compare a timber volume model used in a NFI-based map and models used in a FMI, and (2) evaluate utilizing additional local sample plots in the model of the NFI-based map. Methods Accuracies of timber volume estimates using models from an existing NFI-based map and a FMI were compared at plot and stand level. Results Estimates from the NFI-based map were similar to or more accurate than the FMI. The addition of local plots to the modeling data did not clearly improve the model of the NFI-based map. Conclusion The comparison indicates that NFI-based maps can directly be used in FMIs for timber volume estimation in mature spruce stands, leading to potentially large cost savings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Schumacher ◽  
Marius Hauglin ◽  
Rasmus Astrup ◽  
Johannes Breidenbach

Abstract Background The age of forest stands is critical information for forest management and conservation, for example for growth modelling, timing of management activities and harvesting, or decisions about protection areas. However, area-wide information about forest stand age often does not exist. In this study, we developed regression models for large-scale area-wide prediction of age in Norwegian forests. For model development we used more than 4800 plots of the Norwegian National Forest Inventory (NFI) distributed over Norway between latitudes 58° and 65° N in an 18.2 Mha study area. Predictor variables were based on airborne laser scanning (ALS), Sentinel-2, and existing public map data. We performed model validation on an independent data set consisting of 63 spruce stands with known age. Results The best modelling strategy was to fit independent linear regression models to each observed site index (SI) level and using a SI prediction map in the application of the models. The most important predictor variable was an upper percentile of the ALS heights, and root mean squared errors (RMSEs) ranged between 3 and 31 years (6% to 26%) for SI-specific models, and 21 years (25%) on average. Mean deviance (MD) ranged between − 1 and 3 years. The models improved with increasing SI and the RMSEs were largest for low SI stands older than 100 years. Using a mapped SI, which is required for practical applications, RMSE and MD on plot level ranged from 19 to 56 years (29% to 53%), and 5 to 37 years (5% to 31%), respectively. For the validation stands, the RMSE and MD were 12 (22%) and 2 years (3%), respectively. Conclusions Tree height estimated from airborne laser scanning and predicted site index were the most important variables in the models describing age. Overall, we obtained good results, especially for stands with high SI. The models could be considered for practical applications, although we see considerable potential for improvements if better SI maps were available.


2018 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald E. McRoberts ◽  
Qi Chen ◽  
Dale D. Gormanson ◽  
Brian F. Walters

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ville Vähä-Konka ◽  
Matti Maltamo ◽  
Timo Pukkala ◽  
Kalle Kärhä

Abstract Key message We examined the accuracy of the stand attribute data based on airborne laser scanning (ALS) provided by the Finnish Forest Centre. The precision of forest inventory data was compared for the first time with operative logging data measured by the harvester. Context Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is increasingly used together with models to predict the stand attributes of boreal forests. The information is updated by growth models. Information produced by remote sensing, model prediction, and growth simulation needs field verification. The data collected by harvesters on logging sites provide a means to evaluate and verify the accuracy of the ALS-based data. Aims This study investigated the accuracy of ALS-based forest inventory data provided by the Finnish Forest Centre at the stand level, using harvester data as the reference. Special interest was on timber assortment volumes where the quality reductions of sawlog are model predictions in ALS-based data and true realized reductions in the logging data. Methods We examined the accuracy of total volume and timber assortment volumes by comparing ALS-based data and operative logging data measured by a harvester. This was done both for clear cuttings and thinning sites. Accuracy of the identification of the dominant tree species of the stand was examined using the Kappa coefficient. Results In clear-felling sites, the total harvest removals based on ALS and model prediction had a RMSE% of 26.0%. In thinning, the corresponding difference in the total harvested removal was 42.4%. Compared to logged volume, ALS-based prediction overestimated sawlog removals in clear cuttings and underestimated pulpwood removals. Conclusion The study provided valuable information on the accuracy of ALS-based stand attribute data. Our results showed that ALS-based data need better methods to predict the technical quality of harvested trees, to avoid systematic overestimates of sawlog volume. We also found that the ALS-based estimates do not accurately predict the volume of trees removed in actual thinnings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald E. McRoberts ◽  
Erik Næsset ◽  
Terje Gobakken ◽  
Ole Martin Bollandsås

Forests ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne White ◽  
Michael Wulder ◽  
Mikko Vastaranta ◽  
Nicholas Coops ◽  
Doug Pitt ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuomo Kauranne ◽  
Sergey Pyankov ◽  
Virpi Junttila ◽  
Alexander Kedrov ◽  
Andrey Tarasov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document