scholarly journals Preoperative Assessment of Abdominal Adipose Tissue to Predict Microvascular Invasion in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 000 (000) ◽  
pp. 000-000
Author(s):  
Zongqian Wu ◽  
Hong Lu ◽  
Qiao Xie ◽  
Jie Cheng ◽  
Kuansheng Ma ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 222-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang-bo Yang ◽  
Shuang Zhang ◽  
Yong-jun Jia ◽  
Yong Yu ◽  
Hai-feng Duan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Er-lei Zhang ◽  
Qi Cheng ◽  
Zhi-yong Huang ◽  
Wei Dong

Although liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT) are widely considered as potentially curative therapies for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there is still high risk of tumor recurrence in majority of HCC patients. Previous studies demonstrated that the presence of microvascular invasion (MVI), which was defined as the presence of tumor emboli within the vessels adjacent to HCC, was one of the key factors of early HCC recurrence and poor surgical outcomes after LR or LT. In this review, we evaluated the impact of current MVI status on surgical outcomes after curative therapies and aimed to explore the surgical strategies for HCC based on different MVI status with evidence from pathological examination. Surgical outcomes of HCC patients with MVI have been described as a varied range after curative therapies due to a broad spectrum of current definitions for MVI. Therefore, an international consensus on the validated definition of MVI in HCC is urgently needed to provide a more consistent evaluation and reliable prediction of surgical outcomes for HCC patients after curative treatments. We concluded that MVI should be further sub-classified into MI (microvessel invasion) and MPVI (microscopic portal vein invasion); for HCC patients with MPVI, local R0 resection with a narrow or wide surgical margin will get the same surgical results. However, for HCC patients with MI, local surgical resection with a wide and negative surgical margin will get better surgical outcomes. Nowadays, MVI status can only be reliably confirmed by histopathologic evaluation of surgical specimens, limiting its clinical application. Taken together, preoperative assessment of MVI is of utmost significance for selecting a reasonable surgical modality and greatly improving the surgical outcomes of HCC patients, especially in those with liver cirrhosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Zhou ◽  
Dan Shan ◽  
Chunhui Zhang ◽  
Jianhua Nie ◽  
Guangyu Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy of gadolinium–ethoxybenzyl–diethylenetriamine penta–acetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd–EOB–DTPA–MRI) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) preoperatively. Methods A total of 60 sHCC patients performed with preoperative Gd–EOB–DTPA–MRI in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from October 2018 to October 2019 were involved in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by chi–square test and logistic regression analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Gd–EOB–DTPA–MRI were performed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Univariate analysis indicated that alanine aminotransferase (≥ 39.00U/L), poorly differentiated pathology, and imaging features including grim enhancement, capsule enhancement, arterial halo sign and hepatobiliary features (tumor highly uptake, halo sign, spicule sign and brush sign) were associated with the occurrence of MVI (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that rim enhancement and hepatobiliary spicule sign were independent predictors of MVI (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.917 (95% confidence interval 0.838–0.996), and the sensitivity was 94.74%. Conclusions The morphologies of hepatobiliary phase imaging, especially the spicule sign, showed high accuracy in diagnosing MVI of sHCC. Rim enhancement played a significant role in diagnosing MVI of sHCC.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Du ◽  
Lingli Chen ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Feng Tian ◽  
Haiying Zeng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document