scholarly journals Effect of immediate dentin sealing, bonding technique, and restorative material on the bond strength of indirect restorations

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilal Utku Sag ◽  
Ozden Ozel Bektas
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Bonding Technique

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate dentin sealing, bonding technique, and restorative material on the dentin bond strength of an indirect composite (Solidex) and a resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM block (LAVA Ultimate). Material and Methods: A total of 120 periodontally extracted human molar teeth were abraded horizontally and divided into two groups according to dentin sealing procedures (delayed dentin sealing [DDS] and immediate dentin sealing [IDS]). Next, all teeth were attached to a simulated pulpal pressure mechanism. The specimens were removed from the mechanism after a week. Teeth were subdivided into three groups based on the bonding technique and the type of cement used (Acid-etching + Single Bond Universal + RelyX Ultimate, Single Bond Universal + RelyX Ultimate, RelyX Unicem).  Each subgroup was further divided into 2 subgroups according to the type of restorative material used (Solidex [n=10], Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM restorative material [n=10]).. Sixty cylindrical samples prepared using both the restorative materials were bonded to the tooth surface according to their group’s bonding procedures. All specimens were embedded in chemically cured acrylic resin for shear bond strength test. The shear bond strength (SBS) of the specimens was determined by a universal testing machine with a headspeed of 0.5 mm/min. Results: Three-way ANOVA, independent-sample t test and post hoc Tukey comparison tests (α=0.05) were performed on all data. There were significant differences between the groups. It was found that IDS process significantly increased bond strength in all groups. When dentin bond strengths of tested luting cements were compared, the highest bond strength values were recorded in groups in which the specimens were luted with RelyX Ultimate cement using etch-and-rinse technique. The lowest bond strength values were obtained from groups that used RelyX Unicem as the luting cement. Conclusions: IDS improves bond strength of indirect restorations. Moreover, bonding techniques may have critical effects on the dentin bond strength of indirect restorative materials. The cements’ specific affinity levels to both restorative materials and dentin could be considered as the reason of the situation.KEYWORDSIDS; Luting cement; Shear bond strength; Resin nanoceramic; CAD/CAM.

scholarly journals Indirect versus Direct Bonding—A Shear Bond Strength Comparison: An in vitro Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinaya S Pai ◽  
S Nandini ◽  
M Swetha ◽  
N Sanjay
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Indirect Bonding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bonding Technique

ABSTRACT Aim The process of bonding orthodontic appliances to the enamel surface of the teeth has come to the forefront as a major improvement in bonding techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded using conventional direct bonding and indirect bonding as described by Thomas. Materials and methods Forty sound human premolars were divided into two groups of 20 each. Group I samples were bonded directly on the tooth surface using concise two paste adhesive system after etching and drying. Group II samples were bonded indirectly on the tooth surface according to Thomas indirect bonding technique using concise two paste adhesive system. The stored specimen was tested for shear bond strength in an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Chi-square test showed that there were significant differences among the adhesive remnant index scores between direct and indirect bonding groups. Conclusion In vitro shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect-bonded attachments showed no significant difference between the two groups. Bond strength obtained with Thomas indirect bonding technique was comparable with direct bonding technique. Clinical significance Thomas indirect bonding technique can be used for bonding of the posterior teeth, where the risk of moisture contamination is high during bonding. How to cite this article Swetha M, Pai VS, Sanjay N, Nandini S. Indirect versus Direct Bonding—A Shear Bond Strength Comparison: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12(4):232-238.

scholarly journals The micro-shear bond strength of two different repair systems to indirect restorative materials

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-241
Author(s):  
Atay Ayșe ◽  
◽  
Najafova Lamia ◽  
Kurtulmus Huseyin Mehmet ◽  
Üşümez Aslihan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Acid Mixture ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Repair Systems

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different repair systems (Clearfil Repair, iGOS Repair) to restorative materials for CAD/CAM (Cerasmart, Lava Ultimate, InCoris TZI , VITA Suprinity, VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, IPS Empress CAD). Methodology The 140 1.2 mm-thick specimens were prepared from CAD/CAM blocks (n=20) and thermocycled (10,000 cycles, 5–55°C, dwell time 20s). The specimens were randomly divided into two groups according to the repair system: Clearfil Repair (40% phosphoric acid+mixture of Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator and Clearfil SE Bond Primer+Clearfil SE Bond+CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES-2) and iGOS Repair (40% phosphoric acid+ Multi Primer LIQUID+ iGOS Bond+ iGOS Universal). The composite resins were polymerized. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The μSBS test was performed with a micro-shear testing machine (at 1 mm/min). The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p<0.05. Each failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope at×16 magnification. Results The type of CAD/CAM restorative material and repair system showed a significant effect on the μSBS (p<0.05). Specimens repaired with the iGOS Repair system showed the highest μSBS values than the Clearfil Repair system among all tested materials except for the InCoris TZI group (p<0.05). Conclusion All groups, except for the InCoris TZI group, repaired with iGOS Repair system showed higher μSBS than Clearfil Repair. The type of restoration and repair material is important in the success of the fracture repair.

Shear Bond Strength of Repair Systems to New CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 748-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özlem Üstün ◽  
Işıl Keçik Büyükhatipoğlu ◽  
Aslı Seçilmiş
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Repair Systems

scholarly journals The evaluation of the shear bond strength between various Hybrid CAD/CAM restorative materials and repairing composite resins

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Seop Jeong ◽  
Ji-Myung Bae ◽  
Jeong-Mi Kim ◽  
Young-Bum Park ◽  
Seunghan Oh
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Do Chemical-Based Bonding Techniques Affect the Bond Strength Stability to Cubic Zirconia?

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 3920
Author(s):  
Allegra Comba ◽  
Andrea Baldi ◽  
Riccardo Michelotto Tempesta ◽  
Massimo Carossa ◽  
Letizia Perrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Artificial Aging ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Zirconia Sample ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Composite Cylinders

This study evaluated the effectiveness of chemical-based adhesive techniques on promoting immediate and aged bond strength between zirconia and luting cement. A total of 128 discs of zirconia were divided into 4 groups (n = 32) according to the adhesive treatment: tribochemical silica-coating followed by silane (Silane Primer, Kerr) and bonding (Optibond FL, Kerr), Signum Zirconia Bond (Hereaus), Z-Prime Plus (Bisco), and All-Bond Universal (Bisco). Composite cylinders were cemented on the zirconia sample with Duo-Link Universal (Bisco). Eight specimens per group were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles and subsequently bond strength was tested with shear-bond strength test. ANOVA test showed that artificial aging significantly affected the bond strength to zirconia. Bonferroni test highlighted a significant influence of adhesive treatment (Signum) on bond strength after thermocycling. It was concluded that 10-MDP-based bonding systems showed no improvement in initial bond strength compared with tribochemical treatment. All chemical bonding techniques tested in this study were influenced by thermocycling.

The Effect of Dentin Desensitizer on Shear Bond Strength of Conventional and Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cements After Aging

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Stawarczyk ◽  
R Hartmann ◽  
L Hartmann ◽  
M Roos ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Aging Conditions ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Panavia 21

SUMMARY This study tested the impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two conventional (RelyX ARC, Panavia 21) and two self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem, G-Cem) resin luting cements after water storage and thermocycling. Human third molars (N=880) were embedded in acrylic resin. The buccal dentin was exposed. Teeth were randomly divided into four main groups, and the following cements were adhered: 1) RelyX ARC, 2) Panavia 21, 3) RelyX Unicem, and 4) G-Cem. In half of the teeth in each group, dentin was treated with Gluma Desensitizer. In the conventional cement groups, the corresponding etchant and adhesive systems were applied. SBS of the cements was tested after 1 hour (initial); at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of water storage; and at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of thermocycling. SBS data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); this was followed by the post hoc Scheffé test and a t-test. Overall, the highest mean SBS (MPa) was obtained by RelyX ARC (ranging from 14.6 ± 3.9 to 17.6 ± 5.2) and the lowest by Panavia 21 in combination with Gluma Desensitizer (ranging from 0.0 to 2.9 ± 1.0). All tested groups with and without desensitizer showed no significant decrease after aging conditions compared with baseline values (p&gt;0.05). Only the Panavia 21/Gluma Desensitizer combination showed a significant decrease after 4 days of thermocyling compared with initial values and 1 day thermocycling. Self-adhesive cements with Gluma Desensitizer showed increased SBS after aging conditions (ranging from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 15.2 ± 3) compared with groups without desensitizer (ranging from 2.6 ± 1.2 to 8.8 ± 2.9). No cohesive failures in dentin were observed in any of the test groups. Although self-adhesive cements with and without desensitizer presented mainly adhesive failures after water storage (95.8%) and thermocyling (100%), conventional cement (RelyX ARC) showed mainly mixed failures (90.8% and 89.2%, after water storage and thermocyling, respectively). Application of the Gluma Desensitizer to dentin before cementation had a positive effect on the SBS of self-adhesive cements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document