scholarly journals Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management for General Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Lucio Mango
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Health System ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Risk Management ◽  
Causal Factors ◽  
The Family ◽  
First Contact

General practitioners are the first contact between the person, the family and the community with the health system. The philosopher and epistemologist K. Popper (1902-1994) recommended the need to register errors, in order to know them, catalog them and therefore prevent them. J.Reason in 1963 introduced the systemic approach to the study of errors with the theory of latent errors. The knowledge of the causal factors, or which in any case contribute, of possible errors, as well as of the latent gaps in the system, is a fundamental prerequisite for the construction of paths aimed at improving the quality of assistance, structures and organizational aspects.

scholarly journals Patient Safety in Complementary Medicine through the Application of Clinical Risk Management in the Public Health System

Medicines ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elio Rossi ◽  
Tommaso Bellandi ◽  
Marco Picchi ◽  
Sonia Baccetti ◽  
Maria Monechi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Health System ◽  
Complementary Medicine ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Clinical Risk Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Clinical Risk

scholarly journals The SOFIA pilot trial: a cluster-randomized trial of coordinated, co-produced care to reduce mortality and improve quality of life in people with severe mental illness in the general practice setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Rozing ◽  
A. Jønsson ◽  
R. Køster-Rasmussen ◽  
T. D. Due ◽  
J. Brodersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Coordinated Care ◽  
Educational Training

Abstract Background People with severe mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of premature mortality, predominantly due to somatic health conditions. Evidence indicates that primary and tertiary prevention and improved treatment of somatic conditions in patients with SMI could reduce this excess mortality. This paper reports a protocol designed to evaluate the feasibility of a coordinated co-produced care program (SOFIA model, a Danish acronym for Severe Mental Illness and Physical Health in General Practice) in the general practice setting to reduce mortality and improve quality of life in patients with severe mental illness. Methods The SOFIA pilot trial is designed as a cluster randomized controlled trial targeting general practices in two regions in Denmark. We aim to include 12 practices, each of which is instructed to recruit up to 15 community-dwelling patients aged 18 and older with SMI. Practices will be randomized by a computer in a ratio of 2:1 to deliver a coordinated care program or usual care during a 6-month study period. A randomized algorithm is used to perform randomization. The coordinated care program includes educational training of general practitioners and their clinical staff educational training of general practitioners and their clinical staff, which covers clinical and diagnostic management and focus on patient-centered care of this patient group, after which general practitioners will provide a prolonged consultation focusing on individual needs and preferences of the patient with SMI and a follow-up plan if indicated. The outcomes will be parameters of the feasibility of the intervention and trial methods and will be assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. Assessments of the outcome parameters will be administered at baseline, throughout, and at end of the study period. Discussion If necessary the intervention will be revised based on results from this study. If delivery of the intervention, either in its current form or after revision, is considered feasible, a future, definitive trial to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing mortality and improving quality of life in patients with SMI can take place. Successful implementation of the intervention would imply preliminary promise for addressing health inequities in patients with SMI. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinical Trials as of November 5, 2020, with registration number NCT04618250. Protocol version: January 22, 2021; original version

scholarly journals Clinical Risk Management: As Modern Tool for Prevention and Management of Care and Prevention Occupational Risk

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 831
Author(s):  
Raffaele La Russa ◽  
Stefano Ferracuti
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Clinical Risk Management ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Performance Quality ◽  
Management Of Care ◽  
Modern Tool

Clinical Risk Management aims to improve the performance quality of healthcare services through procedures that identify and prevent circumstances that could expose both the patient and the healthcare personnel to risk of an adverse event [...]

scholarly journals A Parsonian Approach to Patient Safety: Transformational Leadership and Social Capital as Preconditions for Clinical Risk Management—the GI Factor

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 3989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Pfaff ◽  
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Clinical Risk Management ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Risk

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of the combination of transformational leadership and social capital in safety capacity building. Drawing on the A-G-I-L concept of Talcott Parsons, we test a model for patient safety. The hypothesis is, that good safety management needs a combination of goal attainment (G) and integration (I), here called the GI factor. We tested this hypothesis by using transformational leadership as a surrogate for goal attainment and social capital as a surrogate for integration in a study of the perceptions of chief medical officers in 551 German hospitals. We conducted a cross-sectional hospital survey combined with secondary data analysis in all German hospitals with at least one internal medicine unit and one surgery unit (N = 1224 hospitals) in the year 2008 with a response rate of 45% (N = 551). The regression model explained 17.9% of the variance in perceived clinical risk management. We found that if both requirements for goal-oriented collective action—transformational leadership and social capital—are met, good safety management is more likely. The tentative conclusion is that it takes transformative leaders and cohesive followers together as a social basis to improve safety in hospitals.

Next level of board accountability in health care quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Pronovost ◽  
C. Michael Armstrong ◽  
Renee Demski ◽  
Ronald R. Peterson ◽  
Paul B. Rothman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Management System ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Content Type

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer six principles that health system leaders can apply to establish a governance and management system for the quality of care and patient safety. Design/methodology/approach Leaders of a large academic health system set a goal of high reliability and formed a quality board committee in 2011 to oversee quality and patient safety everywhere care was delivered. Leaders of the health system and every entity, including inpatient hospitals, home care companies, and ambulatory services staff the committee. The committee works with the management for each entity to set and achieve quality goals. Through this work, the six principles emerged to address management structures and processes. Findings The principles are: ensure there is oversight for quality everywhere care is delivered under the health system; create a framework to organize and report the work; identify care areas where quality is ambiguous or underdeveloped (i.e. islands of quality) and work to ensure there is reporting and accountability for quality measures; create a consolidated quality statement similar to a financial statement; ensure the integrity of the data used to measure and report quality and safety performance; and transparently report performance and create an explicit accountability model. Originality/value This governance and management system for quality and safety functions similar to a finance system, with quality performance documented and reported, data integrity monitored, and accountability for performance from board to bedside. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first description of how a board has taken this type of systematic approach to oversee the quality of care.

scholarly journals Technovigilance and risk management as tools to improve patient safety in Colombian health care institutions

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Mauricio González Vargas ◽  
Ana María Sánchez Benavides ◽  
Andrés Felipe Betancourt Hernández ◽  
Carlos David Mantilla Ramirez
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Health Care Institutions ◽  
Improve Patient

This paper presents the results of a survey about technovigilance carried out in 21 clinical institutions from the southwest of Colombia. It also provides an analysis of how these programs take into account different risk management methodologies in order to create awareness of the importance of patient safety in all members of the staff and improve the quality of the health services provided.

scholarly journals Can the craze for patient safety hinder a more holistic care of the person in the health care system?

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Mamane Abdoulaye Samri ◽  
Daphney St-Germain
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Clinical Governance ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Holistic Care

Background and objective: Since the publication of a report by the Institute of Medicine on the mortality associated with adverse events in the hospital, patient safety has become one of the essential objectives of the health care system. However, this movement tends to obscure the fundamental link between safety and quality of care in the health system. The study was aimed to demonstrate that the only focus on patient safety concept overshadow the more holistic care of the person and the population in the health care system.Methods: Documentary research in the Pubmed database and the Google Scholar search engine, from 1999 to 2017.Results and conclusion: Highly targeted safety research without addressing quality at first can only be a long-term panacea for current health policies. For cause, a one-way look at patient safety could lead to significant impacts at the population level. In order to get out of this craze, health system decision-makers would benefit from supporting clinical governance advocating humanistic and holistic strategies for interventions, engaging in a process of continuous improvement of the Quality of care more profitable in the long term. In order to overcome this craze, health system decision-makers would benefit from supporting clinical governance that advocates humanistic and holistic strategies for interventions, by engaging in a process of continuous improvement in the quality of care that is most beneficial in the long term. This posture is similar to Caring's well-known nursing model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document