332 Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mexicans and Mexican Americans share culture, genetic background, and predisposition for chronic complications associated with obesity and diabetes making imperative efficacious treatments and prevention. Obesity has been treated for centuries focused-on weight loss while other treatments on associated conditions like gout, diabetes (T2D), and hypertriglyceridemia. To date, there is no systematic review that synthetize the origin of obesity clinics in Mexico and the efforts to investigate treatments for obesity tested by randomized clinical trials (RCT). We conducted systematic searches in Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve anti-obesity RCT through 2019 and without inferior temporal limit. The systematic review included RCT of anti-obesity treatments in the Mexican adult population, including alternative medicine, pharmacological, nutritional, behavioral, and surgical interventions reporting biometric outcomes such as BMI, weight, waist circumference, triglycerides, glucose, among others. Studies with at least three months of treatment were included in the meta-analysis. We found 634 entries, after removal of duplicates and screening the studies based on eligibility criteria, we analyzed 43, and 2 multinational-collaborative studies. Most of the national studies have small sample sizes, and the studied strategies do not have replications in the population. The nutrition/behavioral interventions were difficult to blind, and most studies have medium to high risk of bias. Nutritional/behavioral interventions and medications showed effects on BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure. Simple measures like plain water instead of sweet beverages decrease triglycerides and systolic blood pressure. Participants with obesity and hypertension can have benefic effects with antioxidants, and treatment with insulin increase weight in those with T2D. The study of obesity in Mexico has been on-going for more than four decades, but the interest on RCT just increased until this millennium, but with small sample sizes and lack of replication. The interventions affect different metabolic syndrome components, which should be analyzed in detail with the population living on the U.S.-Mexico border; therefore, bi-national collaboration is desirable to disentangle the cultural effects on this population's treatment response.

Download Full-text

Behavioral interventions for sleep disturbances in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsaa040 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 43 (9) ◽

Author(s):

Natalie L Phillips ◽

Teleri Moore ◽

Arthur Teng ◽

Naomi Brookes ◽

Tonya M Palermo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Behavioral Interventions ◽

Sleep Disturbances ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Sleep Onset ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep disturbances are common and associated with negative functional and health consequences in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders (NNDDs) and represent an important potential target for behavioral interventions. This systematic review examined the efficacy of behavioral sleep interventions (BSIs) for children with NNDDs and comorbid sleep disturbances. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL was conducted in April 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BSI for children with NNDDS were included. Meta-analysis and GRADE quality ratings were performed on sleep and secondary functional outcomes (cognition, academics, and behavior). Results Nine RCTs were identified (n = 690; Mage = 8.39 ± 2.64years; 71.11% male). The quality of the evidence was predominantly rated as moderate. Posttreatment improvements in sleep were found on self-reported sleep disturbances (total sleep disturbance [standardized mean difference, i.e. SMD = 0.89], night wakings [SMD = 0.52], bedtime resistance [SMD = 0.53], parasomnias [SMD = 0.34], sleep anxiety [SMD = 0.50]) and self-reported sleep patterns (sleep duration [SMD = 0.30], sleep onset duration [SMD = 0.75]) and (2) objectively measured actigraphic sleep patterns (total sleep time [MD = 18.09 min; SMD = 0.32], sleep onset latency [MD = 11.96 min; SMD = 0.41]). Improvements in sleep (self-reported, not actigraphy) were maintained at follow-up, but few studies conducted follow-up assessments resulting in low-quality evidence. Reduction in total behavioral problems (SMD = 0.48) posttreatment and attention/hyperactivity (SMD = 0.28) at follow-up was found. Changes in cognition and academic skills were not examined in any studies. Conclusions BSIs improve sleep, at least in the short term, in children with NNDDs. Benefits may extend to functional improvements in behavior. More rigorous RCTs involving placebo controls, blinded outcome assessment, longer follow-up durations, and assessment of functional outcomes are required.

Download Full-text