Reiche Ernte in Gemeinschaftsgärten Beim Urban Gardening findet der Homo oeconomicus sein Korrektiv

Author(s):  
Christa Müller
2009 ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Jan Polowczyk
Keyword(s):  

Artykuł nawiązuje do nasilającej się krytyki doktryny ekonomii głównego nurtu opierającej się na aksjomacie, że człowiek gospodarujący (homo oeconomicus) zachowuje się racjonalnie: optymalizuje decyzje, nie ulega nastrojom, nie jest chciwy itd. Konieczne jest otwarcie się ekonomii tradycyjnej na ekonomię behawioralną, która stała się w ostatnich latach jednym z najbardziej dynamicznych kierunków badań. W artykule podważono powszechne stereotypy dotyczące teorii A.Smitha, w tym przypisujący mu kreację homo oeconomicus. Biorąc pod uwagę całokształt twórczości Smitha - etyka i ekonomisty, należy stwierdzić, że egoizm i altruizm w jego teorii nie są sprzeczne. Odczytywanie ich obecnie na nowo pozwala sformułować pogląd, że A.Smith jest prekursorem ekonomii behawioralnej.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Christopher Strunk ◽  
Ursula Lang

For the most part, research and policymaking on urban gardening have focused on community gardens, whether in parks, vacant lots, or other public land. This emphasis, while important for many Midwestern cities, can obscure the significance of privately owned land such as front yard and back yard and their crucial connections with gardening on public land. In this case study, we examine how policies and practices related to gardening and the management of green space in two Midwestern cities exceed narrow visions of urban agriculture. The article explores the cultivation of vacant lot gardens and private yards as two modes of property in similar Midwestern contexts and argues that the management of green space is about more than urban agriculture. Instead, we show how urban gardening occurs across public/private property distinctions and involves a broader set of actors than those typically included in sustainability policies. Gardening also provides a key set of connections through which neighbors understand and practice sustainability in Midwestern cities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Leef H. Dierks ◽  
Sonja Tiggelbeck
Keyword(s):  

Die Entscheidungsfindung folgt nicht den Postulaten neoklassischer Modelle wie jenem des Homo Oeconomicus. Moderne verhaltensökonomische Ansätze bilden das Verhalten der Wirtschaftssubjekte unter Unsicherheit deutlich realitätsnäher ab. Dies gilt insbesondere bei der Betrachtung vermeintlich begrenzt rationaler Phänomene wie z.B. dem Herdenverhalten auf Finanzmärkten, welches mittlerweile als ernstzunehmende Bedrohung für die Stabilität des weltweiten Finanzsystems wahrgenommen wird.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (28) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Hugo A. Arredondo Vélez
Keyword(s):  

Ante el creciente problema de la corrupción y las implicaciones morales, políticas, económicas y legales que plantea el estado de cosas actual en el mundo moderno y nuestro país, se plantea la siguiente cuestión: ¿cuál es la causa y las alternativas de solución a este problema tan extendido? ¿es posible desarraigarlo? ¿es posbile legislar los efectos positivo-destructivos de la codicia? Se proponen aquí dos hipotesis tentativas. La primera de ellas sostiene que la causa de la corrupción es la codicia; por tanto, se trata de un fenómeno estructural, es decir, cultural. La corrupción no es un problema que pertenezca a un clase, sino que atraviesa todas las capas sociales que se comportan a través de un modelo ideal i.e., el homo oeconomicus. La segunda sostiene que es posible legislar para contrarrestar la corrupción institucional con lo que denomino el ‘segundo desencantamiento del mundo’ –en el sentido de Weber– a partir de la intervención del Legislador Prudente y un modelo ideal alternaivo. De ambos planteamientos sobre los efectos de la codicia y los modelos ideales se derivan las reformas del Estado que permitirán por un lado, la acumulación de capital y, por el otro, la distribución de la riqueza social. El legislador tiene frente así una tarea ardua harto difícil: la de legislar a favor o en contra del capital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 147-170

The article provides a comparison of the concept of homo œconomicus with the core theses of René Descartes’ moral philosophy. The first section draws on the work of the contemporary Western philosopher Anselm Jappe in which Descartes’ philosophy is held to be the cornerstone of the established view and current scientific definitions of homo œconomicus as the fundamental and indispensable agent of capitalistic relations. As opposed to this “common sense” position in the modern social sciences, the second section of the article builds upon Pierre Bourdieu’s Anthropologie économique (2017) to demystify the notion of homo œconomicus. The article then examines some aspects of modern philosophical anthropology that show odd traces of Descartes’ thinking and that are regularly applied in economic science as well as in the critique of economic thinking as such. These are the concepts of mutuality, giving, exchange and generosity, and they are regarded as central to the philosopher’s moral doctrine.The author concludes that the philosophical doctrine of generosity has very little in common with the bourgeois ideology of utility which implies an instrumental relationship between subjects: in Caretesian moral philosophy the Other is neither an object of influence nor a means to achieve someone’s personal goals nor a windowless monad. Generosity certainly has its economic aspects, but these do not include accumulating wealth in the bourgeois sense. It is more in the realm of the aristocratic practice of making dispensations. All throughout his life Decartes may be viewed as exhibiting a peculiar kind of nobility in which the desire to give, endow and sacrifice outweighs any selfish interest. The vigorous pursuit of well-being gives way to a quest for the leisure required to pursue intellectual activity, and care for oneself does not preclude attending to and loving the Other, whatever form it may take.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-511
Author(s):  
Tim Christiaens

In his lectures on neoliberalism, Michel Foucault argues that neoliberalism produces subjects as ‘entrepreneurs of themselves’. He bases this claim on Gary Becker’s conception of the utility-maximizing agent who solely acts upon cost/benefit-calculations. Not all neoliberalized subjects, however, are encouraged to maximize their utility through mere calculation. This article argues that Foucault’s description of neoliberal subjectivity obscures a non-calculative, more audacious side to neoliberal subjectivity. Precarious workers in the creative industries, for example, are encouraged not merely to rationally manage their human capital, but also to take a leap of faith to acquire unpredictable successes. It is this latter risk-loving, extra-calculative side to neoliberal subjectivity that economists usually designate as ‘entrepreneurial’. By confronting Foucault with the theories of entrepreneurship of the Austrian School of Economics, Frank Knight, and Joseph Schumpeter, the Foucauldian analytical framework is enriched. Neoliberal subjectivation is not the monolithic promotion of utility-maximizing agents, but the generation of a multiplicity of modes for entrepreneurs to relate to oneself and the market.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-207
Author(s):  
Ioannis Gravalos ◽  
Avgoustinos Avgousti ◽  
Theodoros Gialamas ◽  
Nikolaos Alfieris ◽  
Georgios Paschalidis

Water supply limits and continued population growth have intensified the search for measures to conserve water in urban gardening and agriculture. The efficiency of water use is depended on performance of the irrigation technologies and management practices. In this study, a robotic irrigation system was developed that consists of a moving bridge manipulator and a sensor-based platform. The manipulator constructed is partly using open-source components and software, and is easily reconfigurable and extendable. In combination to the sensor-based platform this custommade manipulator has the potential to monitor the soil water content (SWC) in real time. The irrigation robotic system was tested in an experimental soil tank. The total surface of the soil tank was divided by a raster into 18 equal quadrants. The water management for maintaining water content in the soil tank within tolerable lower limit (refill point) was based on three irrigation treatments: i) quadrants whose SWC is below the refill point are irrigated; ii) quadrants are irrigated only when the daily mean SWC of the tank is below the refill point and only for those whose actual SWC is lower than that limit; and iii) quadrants are irrigated every two days with constant amount of water. A comparison of the results of the three irrigation treatments showed that the second treatment gave less irrigation events and less applied water. Finally, we could conclude that the performance of the fabricated robotic system is appropriate and it could play an important role in achieving sustainable irrigation into urban food systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document