scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Algoritma Decision Tree, kNN, dan Naive Bayes untuk Prediksi Kesuksesan Start-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-188
Author(s):  
Adhitya Prayoga Permana ◽  
Kurniyatul Ainiyah ◽  
Khadijah Fahmi Hayati Holle

Start-ups have a very important role in economic growth, the existence of a start-up can open up many new jobs. However, not all start-ups that are developing can become successful start-ups. This is because start-ups have a high failure rate, data shows that 75% of start-ups fail in their development. Therefore, it is important to classify the successful and failed start-ups, so that later it can be used to see the factors that most influence start-up success, and can also predict the success of a start-up. Among the many classifications in data mining, the Decision Tree, kNN, and Naïve Bayes algorithms are the algorithms that the authors chose to classify the 923 start-up data records that were previously obtained. The test results using cross-validation and T-test show that the Decision Tree Algorithm is the most appropriate algorithm for classifying in this case study. This is evidenced by the accuracy value obtained from the Decision Tree algorithm, which is greater than other algorithms, which is 79.29%, while the kNN algorithm has an accuracy value of 66.69%, and Naive Bayes is 64.21%.

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1.7) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danda Shashank Reddy ◽  
Chinta Naga Harshitha ◽  
Carmel Mary Belinda

Now a day’s many advanced techniques are proposed in diagnosing the tumor in brain like magnetic resonance imaging, computer tomography scan, angiogram, spinal tap and biospy. Based on diagnosis it is easy to predict treatment. All of the types of brain tumor are officially reclassified by the World Health Organization. Brain tumors are of 120 types, almost each tumor is having same symptoms and it is difficult to predict treatment. For this regard we are proposing more accurate and efficient algorithm in predicting the type of brain tumor is Naïve Bayes’ classification and decision tree algorithm. The main focus is on solving tumor classification problem using these algorithms. Here the main goal is to show that the prediction through the decision tree algorithm is simple and easy than the Naïve Bayes’ algorithm.


SinkrOn ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumpena Sumpena ◽  
Yuma Akbar ◽  
Nirat Nirat ◽  
Mario Hengky

Critical patients need intensive care and supervision by the medical team in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), including ventilators, monitors, Central Venous Pressure (CVP), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiogram (ECHO), medical supply, and medical information that is fast, precise, and accurate. In the ICU treatment room requires data that needs to be processed and analyzed for decision making. This study analyzed the ventilator, CVP and also Sepsis Diagnosis related to the data of moving patients and patients dying. This study also uses the decision tree algorithm C.45 and Naive Bayes to determine the level of accuracy of patient care and supervision information in the ICU. The results showed that the decision tree algorithm C.45 has an accuracy of 81.55% and Naive Bayes of 81.54%. The decision tree C.45 algorithm has almost the same advantages as the Naive Bayes algorithm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2429-2433

The aim of this research work is to identify the improvement pattern of academic performance of final year students of self-financing arts and science colleges. The data was collected from the students of nine Arts and Science Colleges. The data contains demographic, socio-economic, residence and college location, subjects, infrastructural facilities, faculty concern and self-motivation attributes. The classification algorithms like Naïve Bayes, Decision tree and CBPANN are applied on the student’s data. The outcome of the research can be used to improve the academic performance students studying in self-financing arts and science colleges located in educationally backward areas. The experiment results shows that the accuracy value for Naïve Bayes algorithm is 92.63%, accuracy value for Decision Tree algorithm is 96.41% and accuracy value for CBPANN algorithm is 99.49%


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1084-1096
Author(s):  
T. Dinesh

Aim: The main aim of the study proposed is to perform higher classification of fake political news by implementing fake news detectors using machine learning classifiers by comparing their performance. Materials and Methods: By considering two groups such as Decision Tree algorithm and Naive Bayes algorithm. The algorithms have been implemented and tested over a dataset which consists of 44,000 records. Through the programming experiment which is performed using N=10 iterations on each algorithm to identify various scales of fake news and true news classification. Result: After performing the experiment the mean accuracy of 99.6990 by using Decision Tree algorithm and the accuracy of 95.3870 by using Naive Bayes algorithm for fake political news in. There is a statistical significant difference in accuracy for two algorithms is p<0.05 by performing independent samples t-tests. Conclusion: This paper is intended to implement the innovative fake news detection approach on recent Machine Learning Classifiers for prediction of fake political news. By testing the algorithms performance and accuracy on fake political news detection and other issues. The comparison results shows that the Decision Tree algorithm has better performance when compared to Naive Bayes algorithm.


Author(s):  
Shahadat Iqbal ◽  
Taraneh Ardalan ◽  
Mohammed Hadi ◽  
Evangelos Kaisar

Transit signal priority (TSP) and freight signal priority (FSP) allow transportation agencies to prioritize signal service allocations considering the priority of vehicles and, potentially, decrease the impact signal control has on them. However, there have been no studies to develop guidelines for implementing signal control considering both TSP and FSP. This paper reports on a study conducted to provide such guidelines that employed a literature review, a simulation study, and a decision tree algorithm based on the simulation results. The guideline developed provides recommendations in accordance with the signal timing slack time, the proportion of major to minor street hourly volume, hourly truck volume per lane for the major street, hourly truck volume per lane for the minor street, the proportion of major to minor street hourly truck volume, the proportion of major to minor street hourly bus volume, the volume-to-capacity ratio for the major street, and the volume-to-capacity ratio for the minor street. The guideline developed was validated by implementing it for a case study facility. The validation result showed that the guideline works correctly for both high and low traffic demand.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1038
Author(s):  
Indra Rukmana ◽  
Arvin Rasheda ◽  
Faiz Fathulhuda ◽  
Muh Rizky Cahyadi ◽  
Fitriyani Fitriyani

This research is focused on knowing the performance of the classification algorithms, namely Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree-J48 and K-Nearest Neighbor. The speed and the percentage of accuracy in this study are the benchmarks for the performance of the algorithm. This study uses the Breast Cancer and Thoracic Surgery dataset, which is downloaded on the UCI Machine Learning Repository website. Using the help of Weka software Version 3.8.5 to find out the classification algorithm testing. The results show that the J-48 Decision Tree algorithm has the best accuracy, namely 75.6% in the cross-validation test mode for the Breast Cancer dataset and 84.5% for the Thoracic Surgery dataset.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document