scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DECISION TREE ALGORITHM AND NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIER FOR SWINE FLU PREDICTION

Author(s):  
Mangesh J. Shinde .
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Yuris Alkhalifi ◽  
Ainun Zumarniansyah ◽  
Rian Ardianto ◽  
Nila Hardi ◽  
Annisa Elfina Augustia

Non-Cash Food Assistance or Bantuan Pangan Non-Tunai (BPNT) is food assistance from the government given to the Beneficiary Family (KPM) every month through an electronic account mechanism that is used only to buy food at the Electronic Shop Mutual Assistance Joint Business Group Hope Family Program (e-Warong KUBE PKH ) or food traders working with Bank Himbara. In its distribution, BPNT still has problems that occur that are experienced by the village apparatus especially the apparatus of Desa Wanasari on making decisions, which ones are worthy of receiving (poor) and not worthy of receiving (not poor). So one way that helps in making decisions can be done through the concept of data mining. In this study, a comparison of 2 algorithms will be carried out namely Naive Bayes Classifier and Decision Tree C.45. The total sample used is as much as 200 head of household data which will then be divided into 2 parts into validation techniques is 90% training data and 10% test data of the total sample used then the proposed model is made in the RapidMiner application and then evaluated using the Confusion Matrix table to find out the highest level of accuracy from 2 of these methods. The results in this classification indicate that the level of accuracy in the Naive Bayes Classifier method is 98.89% and the accuracy level in the Decision Tree C.45 method is 95.00%. Then the conclusion that in this study the algorithm with the highest level of accuracy is the Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm method with a difference in the accuracy rate of 3.89%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 260-266
Author(s):  
Subhankar Manna ◽  
Malathi G.

Healthcare industry collects huge amount of unclassified data every day.  For an effective diagnosis and decision making, we need to discover hidden data patterns. An instance of such dataset is associated with a group of metabolic diseases that vary greatly in their range of attributes. The objective of this paper is to classify the diabetic dataset using classification techniques like Naive Bayes, ID3 and k means classification. The secondary objective is to study the performance of various classification algorithms used in this work. We propose to implement the classification algorithm using R package. This work used the dataset that is imported from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, Diabetes 130-US hospitals for years 1999-2008 Data Set. Motivation/Background: Naïve Bayes is a probabilistic classifier based on Bayes theorem. It provides useful perception for understanding many algorithms. In this paper when Bayesian algorithm applied on diabetes dataset, it shows high accuracy. Is assumes variables are independent of each other. In this paper, we construct a decision tree from diabetes dataset in which it selects attributes at each other node of the tree like graph and model, each branch represents an outcome of the test, and each node hold a class attribute. This technique separates observation into branches to construct tree. In this technique tree is split in a recursive way called recursive partitioning. Decision tree is widely used in various areas because it is good enough for dataset distribution. For example, by using ID3 (Decision tree) algorithm we get a result like they are belong to diabetes or not. Method: We will use Naïve Bayes for probabilistic classification and ID3 for decision tree.  Results: The dataset is related to Diabetes dataset. There are 18 columns like – Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. and 623 rows. Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm will be used for getting the probability of having diabetes or not. Here Diabetes is the class for Diabetes data set. There are two conditions “Yes” and “No” and have some personal information about the patient like - Races, Gender, Take_metformin, Take_repaglinide, Insulin, Body_mass_index, Self_reported_health etc. We will see the probability that for “Yes” what unit of probability and for “No” what unit of probability which is given bellow. For Example: Gender – Female have 0.4964 for “No” and 0.5581 for “Yes” and for Male 0.5035 is for “No” and 0.4418 for “Yes”. Conclusions: In this paper two algorithms had been implemented Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm and ID3 algorithm. From Naive Bayes Classifier algorithm, the probability of having diabetes has been predicted and from ID3 algorithm a decision tree has been generated.


Author(s):  
Neli Kalcheva ◽  
◽  
Maya Todorova ◽  
Ginka Marinova ◽  
◽  
...  

The purpose of the publication is to analyse popular classification algorithms in machine learning. The following classifiers were studied: Naive Bayes Classifier, Decision Tree and AdaBoost Ensemble Algorithm. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Research shows that there is no comprehensive universal method or algorithm for classification in machine learning. Each method or algorithm works well depending on the specifics of the task and the data used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document