Opportunities for Oncology in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

2013 ◽  
pp. 436-440
Author(s):  
Kavita K. Patel ◽  
Lisa Tran
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Triple Aim ◽  
Patient Protection ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
Improve Health

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contains within it three significant legislative constructs: to enhance access to health care, improve quality, and decrease cost. Also known as the Triple Aim, these three simple, yet monumental, goals have been the object of actions to date as well as future implementation efforts. This article will identify sections of the legislation that would directly provide areas of opportunity to improve health and achieve the triple aim for the oncology profession.

Insurance Type and Access to Health Care Providers and Appointments Under the Affordable Care Act

Medical Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Héctor E. Alcalá ◽  
Dylan H. Roby ◽  
David T. Grande ◽  
Ryan M. McKenna ◽  
Alexander N. Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Insurance Type ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Affordable Care Act

The ACA's Choice Problem

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-515
Author(s):  
Allison K. Hoffman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Health Plans ◽  
Vicious Cycle ◽  
Love Affair ◽  
Policy Theory ◽  
Access To Health

Abstract The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is in many ways a success. Millions more Americans now have access to health care, and the ACA catalyzed advances in health care delivery reform. Simultaneously, it has reinforced and bolstered a problem at the heart of American health policy and regulation: a love affair with choice. The ACA's insurance reforms doubled down on the particularly American obsession with choice. This article describes three ways in which that doubling down is problematic for the future of US health policy. First, pragmatically, health policy theory predicts that choice among health plans will produce tangible benefits that it does not actually produce. Most people do not like choosing among health plan options, and many people—even if well educated and knowledgeable—do not make good choices. Second, creating the regulatory structures to support these choices built and reinforced a massive market bureaucracy. Finally, and most important, philosophically and sociologically the ACA reinforces the idea that the goal of health regulation should be to preserve choice, even when that choice is empty. This vicious cycle seems likely to persist based on the lead up to the 2020 presidential election.

The potential for telemedicine and telecare in Deptford

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
I Jardine ◽  
K Clough ◽  
J Navein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Improve Health Care ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Improve Health

We carried out a study to explore the potential of telemedicine and telecare to improve health-care for the population served by a health centre based in Deptford in south-east London. A wide range of potentially useful telemedicine and telecare applications was identified, nine of which could provide some immediate benefit. Others requiring new approaches to the delivery of care involved some re-engineering of services. Some suggestions focused on the need to integrate information technology with service provision. Other suggestions raised strategic questions, the most important of which concerned the routes of access to health-care.

Better Than Nothing: Participant Experiences in Using a County Health Plan

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Rovin ◽  
Rebecca Stone ◽  
Linda Gordon ◽  
Emilia Boffi ◽  
Linda Hunt
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Government ◽  
Patient Protection ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
History Of ◽  
Better Than

The United States health care system has reached a crisis point, with 49.9 million Americans now living without health insurance (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, and Smith 2011). The United States government has responded to this crisis in a variety of ways, perhaps the most visible being the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010. With a goal of expanding access to health insurance to 32 million Americans by 2019, the ACA marks an important moment in the history of United States health care reform with the potential to drastically change the United States health insurance landscape (Connors and Gostin 2010). The law delineates only general categories of required benefits and leaves it to each state to decide the specific benefits that will be provided by the insurers in their state (Pear 2011).

scholarly journals Currents in Contemporary Bioethics

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Rothstein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Expert Witness ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Patient Protection ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
Malpractice Claims ◽  
Medical Malpractice Claims

The seemingly interminable debates about health care reform in the last few years have focused mainly on health care access, quality, and cost. Debates on the medical malpractice component of the issue have focused almost entirely on cost. The familiar arguments in favor of limiting liability include the financial and health costs of defensive medicine; decreased physician supply in certain specialties and geographic areas; excessive awards; and high transaction costs, including attorney and expert witness fees. The equally familiar arguments in favor of maintaining tort liability include the need to promote civil justice, deter substandard care, identify incompetent practitioners, and encourage systemic quality improvement.Numerous studies have explored the possible effects of damage caps and other measures on malpractice premiums, health care costs, and other financial endpoints. One relatively under-examined aspect of the issue is how federal legislation expanding access to health care might alter the number of medical malpractice claims. With the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA), it is especially appropriate to consider what effect, if any, the new law will have on the rate of medical malpractice claims.

scholarly journals Compact for care: how the Affordable Care Act marketplaces fell short for a vulnerable population in Hawaii

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. e007701
Author(s):  
Joshua S Ng Kamstra ◽  
Teresa Molina ◽  
Timothy Halliday
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Free Association ◽  
Marshall Islands ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Government Programs ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Usa

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010 to expand access to health insurance in the USA and promote innovation in health care delivery. While the law significantly reduced the proportion of uninsured, the market-based protection it provides for poor and vulnerable US residents is an imperfect substitute for government programs such as Medicaid. In 2015, residents of Hawaii from three Compact of Free Association nations (the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau and Marshall Islands) lost their eligibility for the state’s Medicaid program and were instructed to enrol in coverage via the ACA marketplace. This transition resulted in worsened access to health care and ultimately increased mortality in this group. We explain these changes via four mechanisms: difficulty communicating the policy change to affected individuals, administrative barriers to coverage under the ACA, increased out of pocket health care costs and short enrolment windows. To achieve universal health coverage in the USA, these challenges must be addressed by policy-makers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document