scholarly journals Surrogate Indicators of Overall Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Tian Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

scholarly journals Baseline Interleukin-6 and -8 predict response and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib monotherapy: an exploratory post hoc analysis of the SORAMIC trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Öcal ◽  
Kerstin Schütte ◽  
Juozas Kupčinskas ◽  
Egidijus Morkunas ◽  
Gabija Jurkeviciute ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Y90 Radioembolization ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Purpose To explore the potential correlation between baseline interleukin (IL) values and overall survival or objective response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib. Methods A subset of patients with HCC undergoing sorafenib monotherapy within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC, sorafenib treatment alone vs. combined with Y90 radioembolization) underwent baseline IL-6 and IL-8 assessment before treatment initiation. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, the best cut-off points for baseline IL-6 and IL-8 values predicting overall survival (OS) were evaluated, as well as correlation with the objective response. Results Forty-seven patients (43 male) with a median OS of 13.8 months were analyzed. Cut-off values of 8.58 and 57.9 pg/mL most effectively predicted overall survival for IL-6 and IL-8, respectively. Patients with high IL-6 (HR, 4.1 [1.9–8.9], p < 0.001) and IL-8 (HR, 2.4 [1.2–4.7], p = 0.009) had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with low IL values. Multivariate analysis confirmed IL-6 (HR, 2.99 [1.22–7.3], p = 0.017) and IL-8 (HR, 2.19 [1.02–4.7], p = 0.044) as independent predictors of OS. Baseline IL-6 and IL-8 with respective cut-off values predicted objective response rates according to mRECIST in a subset of 42 patients with follow-up imaging available (IL-6, 46.6% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.007; IL-8, 50.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011). Conclusion IL-6 and IL-8 baseline values predicted outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients in this well-characterized prospective cohort of the SORAMIC trial. We suggest that the respective cut-off values might serve for validation in larger cohorts, potentially offering guidance for improved patient selection.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-102
Author(s):  
Zhe Yang ◽  
Bulat Abdrakhimov ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Qin-Fen Xie ◽  
Shu-Sen Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Receive Treatment

Current strategy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria dictates that patients with advanced-stage HCC are to only receive treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, they prolong overall survival just by slightly more than 6 months. In this article, we present a patient with HCC diagnosed at an advanced stage who received multidisciplinary treatment consisting of transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic resection, pulmonary resection, radiofrequency ablation, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and radiotherapy, and has survived for more than 2 years since diagnosis and counting.

Experience with Sorafenib in 3 Hospitals in Sao Paulo

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-10
Author(s):  
Rogério Camargo-Pinheiro-Alves ◽  
Daniele E. Viera-Alves ◽  
Arthur Malzyner ◽  
Otavio Gampel ◽  
Thaisa de F. Almeida-Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Introduction and aim. Sorafenib has been the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, a complex disease that affects an extremely heterogenous population. Thereby requiring multidisciplinary individualized treatment strategies that match the disease characteristics and the patients’ specific needs. Material and methods. Data for 175 patients who received sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma in three different hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil over a span of nine years were retrospectively analyzed. Results. The median age was 62 years. Percentages of patients with Child-Pugh A, B and C liver cirrhosis were 61%, 31% and 5%, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B disease, and the other half had stage C. The median treatment duration was 253 days. Sorafenib dose was reduced to 400 mg/day in 41% of the patients due to toxicity. Overall objective response rate as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and its modified version was 39%. Patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) at any point during sorafenib therapy were significantly more likely to experience an objective response. After a median follow-up of 339 days, the median overall survival was 380 days. Child-Pugh cirrhosis, tumor response and concomitant chemoembolization were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Our results suggest that, in experienced hands, sorafenib therapy may benefit carefully selected hepatocellular carcinoma patients for whom other therapies are initially contraindicated, including those patients with Child-Pugh B liver function and those patients who are subsequently treated with concomitant TACE.

Assessment of radioembolization among patients who met the inclusion criteria for Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14654-e14654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Sangro ◽  
Livio Carpanese ◽  
Roberto Cianni ◽  
Daniele Gasparini ◽  
Rita Golfieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Good Liver Function

e14654 Background: SHARP was pivotal in determining the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with predominately good liver function. In practice, many patients with advanced HCC receive radioembolization (RE). Investigators from the European Network on RE with yttrium-90 resin microspheres (ENRY) group conducted an analysis of safety and survival among consecutive patients who met the SHARP inclusion criteria. Methods: 58% of patients (189 of 325) who had received RE between 09/2003 and 12/2009 were considered SHARP-equivalents. Of these, 11.6% received sorafenib 4.7 months (median) after RE for a median duration of 2.8 months. Safety and tolerability analyses were conducted up to day 90 post RE; changes from baseline were recorded and transitions in CTCAE grades >3 tested. Statistical analyses used SAS (SAS, Cary NC) version 9.2 XP Pro. Results: Like the SHARP sorafenib cohort, most patients had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C: 72.5%), good liver function (Child–Pugh class A: 100%) and ECOG performance status (0–1: 90.5%). Macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread (EHD) or both was present in 33.9%. 20.1% had received prior surgical procedures, 8.5% prior ablative procedures and 33.3% prior vascular [chemo]embolization. RE was predominantly a single whole-liver procedure (median activity 1.7 GBq). Median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.8–12.8) in the SHARP-equivalent cohort, 10.2 months (8.3–11.8) in patients with MVI/EHD, 9.7 months (7.6–10.9) in advanced HCC (BCLC stage C) and 16.6 months (11.2–22.8) in intermediate HCC (BCLC stage B). Treatment-related adverse events (all grades; grade >3) were: fatigue (50.3%; 2.1%), abdominal pain (25.9%; 2.1%), nausea/vomiting (31.2%; 0.5%) and GI ulcer (3.2%; 1.0%). At baseline, raised bilirubin (all grades) was present in 20.3%, increasing to 49.4% of patients evaluated up to day 90. Bilirubin grade was unchanged in 58.1% and increased in 37.8%; 4.0% had ≥grade 3 events. Conclusions: In patients matching the inclusion criteria for SHARP, RE was well tolerated with a median overall survival which compares favorably with sorafenib.

Decreased Blood Flow after Sorafenib Administration Is an Imaging Biomarker to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadaaki Arizumi ◽  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Hirokazu Chishina ◽  
Masashi Kono ◽  
Masahiro Takita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Imaging Biomarker ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document