Experience with Sorafenib in 3 Hospitals in Sao Paulo

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-10
Author(s):  
Rogério Camargo-Pinheiro-Alves ◽  
Daniele E. Viera-Alves ◽  
Arthur Malzyner ◽  
Otavio Gampel ◽  
Thaisa de F. Almeida-Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Introduction and aim. Sorafenib has been the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, a complex disease that affects an extremely heterogenous population. Thereby requiring multidisciplinary individualized treatment strategies that match the disease characteristics and the patients’ specific needs. Material and methods. Data for 175 patients who received sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma in three different hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil over a span of nine years were retrospectively analyzed. Results. The median age was 62 years. Percentages of patients with Child-Pugh A, B and C liver cirrhosis were 61%, 31% and 5%, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B disease, and the other half had stage C. The median treatment duration was 253 days. Sorafenib dose was reduced to 400 mg/day in 41% of the patients due to toxicity. Overall objective response rate as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and its modified version was 39%. Patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) at any point during sorafenib therapy were significantly more likely to experience an objective response. After a median follow-up of 339 days, the median overall survival was 380 days. Child-Pugh cirrhosis, tumor response and concomitant chemoembolization were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Our results suggest that, in experienced hands, sorafenib therapy may benefit carefully selected hepatocellular carcinoma patients for whom other therapies are initially contraindicated, including those patients with Child-Pugh B liver function and those patients who are subsequently treated with concomitant TACE.

scholarly journals Baseline Interleukin-6 and -8 predict response and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib monotherapy: an exploratory post hoc analysis of the SORAMIC trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Öcal ◽  
Kerstin Schütte ◽  
Juozas Kupčinskas ◽  
Egidijus Morkunas ◽  
Gabija Jurkeviciute ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Y90 Radioembolization ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Purpose To explore the potential correlation between baseline interleukin (IL) values and overall survival or objective response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib. Methods A subset of patients with HCC undergoing sorafenib monotherapy within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC, sorafenib treatment alone vs. combined with Y90 radioembolization) underwent baseline IL-6 and IL-8 assessment before treatment initiation. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, the best cut-off points for baseline IL-6 and IL-8 values predicting overall survival (OS) were evaluated, as well as correlation with the objective response. Results Forty-seven patients (43 male) with a median OS of 13.8 months were analyzed. Cut-off values of 8.58 and 57.9 pg/mL most effectively predicted overall survival for IL-6 and IL-8, respectively. Patients with high IL-6 (HR, 4.1 [1.9–8.9], p < 0.001) and IL-8 (HR, 2.4 [1.2–4.7], p = 0.009) had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with low IL values. Multivariate analysis confirmed IL-6 (HR, 2.99 [1.22–7.3], p = 0.017) and IL-8 (HR, 2.19 [1.02–4.7], p = 0.044) as independent predictors of OS. Baseline IL-6 and IL-8 with respective cut-off values predicted objective response rates according to mRECIST in a subset of 42 patients with follow-up imaging available (IL-6, 46.6% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.007; IL-8, 50.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011). Conclusion IL-6 and IL-8 baseline values predicted outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients in this well-characterized prospective cohort of the SORAMIC trial. We suggest that the respective cut-off values might serve for validation in larger cohorts, potentially offering guidance for improved patient selection.

Transarterial chemoembolization for pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1110) ◽  
pp. 20190407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Hori ◽  
Ryosuke Ohira ◽  
Tomoyuki Nakamura ◽  
Yasushi Kimura ◽  
Shota Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
End Point ◽  
Promising Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with HepaSphere for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Between June 2009 and January 2018, 14 patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from HCC were treated with TACE with a combination of 1–3 chemotherapeutic drugs followed by HepaSphere embolization. As first end point, local tumor response and adverse events were evaluated after the first session of TACE, with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v. 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4 criteria, respectively. Overall survival was evaluated as secondary end point. TACE was repeated on-demand. Results: TACE with HepaSphere was well tolerated with acceptable safety profile and no 30 day mortality. 1 month objective response and disease control rate were calculated to be 7.1 and 100%, respectively. Mean tumor size reduction rate was 15.6±9.5% at the first month. Two Grade 3 cytopenia events were seen (14.3 %), however none of the Grade 2 or more post-embolization syndrome was observed. The median overall survival time was 15.0 months and the 1 year, 3 year and 5 year survival rate were, 57.1%, 28.6%, 19.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Early experience showed that the transarterial treatment with HepaSphere is safe and effective treatment for patients with pulmonary or mediastinal metastases from HCC. Advances in knowledge: Currently, the effects of molecular targeted drugs on HCC metastases are limited and side-effects are relatively frequent. In the present study, transarterial treatment might be a promising treatment for HCC metastasis.

Role and strategies of radiofrequency ablation in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14701-e14701
Author(s):  
Min Hua Chen ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Kun Yan
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Percutaneous Ablation ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Tnm System ◽  
Liver Protection

e14701 Background: To investigate the application value and strategies of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which is common in china. Methods: A total of 655 patients with unresectablely advanced HCC underwent percuatenous RFA therapy and 92 patients with 136 tumors among them were enrolled into the study. According to the 6th UICC/AJCC-TNM system, 82 and 10 patients were in stage III and IV, respectively. The tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 8.0 cm (mean±SD, 4.5±1.6 cm). 59 patients had solitary tumor and the remaining 33 patients had multiple tumors. The Child-Pugh classification of A, B and C were 58,32 and 2 patients, respectively. Established strategies included: (1) select RFA indications based on the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) results; (2) design radical protocols based on invasive range showed by CEUS; (3) multiple overlapping ablations based on mathematical protocol; (4) two or three bipolar RFA electrodes with three dimensional localization; (5) color US guided percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery (including TACE) + RFA for HCC with rich supply. The patients underwent follow-up using enhanced CT at one month, and then every three months after RFA. The ablation was considered a success if no abnormal enhancement or wash-out was detected in the treated area on the CT scan at one month. All patients after RFA received liver protection treatments. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Early complete tumor necrosis rate after initial RFA was 90.4% (123/136 tumors). Serious complications were developed in two patients (2.2%) and no treatment-related death occurred. 3~129 months were followed up. Local recurrence rate was 15.4 %(21/136 tumors). The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were 83.3 %, 48.3 %, 21.9%, respectively, and the median survival time was 35 months. Conclusions: RFA treatment of advanced HCC proved to be feasible. Paying attention to apply treatment strategies and liver protection therapies in RFA can effectively improve the survival.

Efficacy and safety of localized concurrent chemoradiation therapy and sorafenib sequential therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective phase II trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15678-e15678
Author(s):  
Beom Kyung Kim ◽  
Do Young Kim ◽  
Hye Jin Choi ◽  
Seung-Hoon Beom ◽  
Hye Won Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment

e15678 Background: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a particularly poor prognosis of the median overall survival of less than 12 months. Even though sorafenib has been approved for treating advanced stage HCC, the unsatisfactory objective response rate still remain unresolved. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by sequential sorafenib treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This study is an ongoing, phase II trial. Patients with advanced HCC not amenable for curative treatments were eligible. In the course of radiotherapy for 5 weeks, hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (500mg/day) via implanted port was applied during the first 5 days and the last 5 days of radiotherapy. Four weeks after localized CCRT, sorafenib (400mg bid) was maintained. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. After the completion of localized CCRT, the objective response rate was 31.9%. During the overall treatment course, the objective response rate was 46.8% respectively. Overall, 7 patients (14.9%) underwent curative resection or transplantation after down-staging. The median overall survival was 18.4 months and the progression-free survival was 6.8 months. Adverse events were predictable and manageable with conservative care. Conclusions: Localized CCRT followed by sequential sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC showed significant activity and good tolerability. Furthermore, such a treatment modality, when compared to the use of sorafenib alone, might provide the additional therapeutic benefit through initial tumor reduction, allowing curative treatment after down-staging in 14.9% of patients, Further randomized trial should be required to make the more robust evidence. Clinical trial information: NCT02425605.

Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Nonviral Infection Who Were Unlikely to Respond to Immunotherapy: A Retrospective, Comparative Study

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hatanaka ◽  
Satoru Kakizaki ◽  
Tamon Nagashima ◽  
Masashi Namikawa ◽  
Takashi Ueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Infection Group ◽  
Significant Difference

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo + bev) shows a good overall survival (OS) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the OS of patients with nonviral infection is quite worse than that in those with viral infection. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with nonviral infection, who were unlikely to obtain benefit from atezo + bev. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included 139 advanced HCC patients treated with lenvatinib between March 2018 and September 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age was 72 years, and 116 patients (83.5%) were male. Based on the etiology of liver disease, 84 (60.4%) and 55 patients (39.6%) were assigned to the viral infection and nonviral infection groups, respectively. The significant extents in patient characteristics were not observed in both groups. The objective response rate per mRECIST and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between the viral infection and nonviral infection groups (36.0 vs. 33.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.85; and 7.6 vs. 7.5 months, <i>p</i> = 0.94, respectively). The 1-year survival rates were 68.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7–79.7%) in the viral infection group and 59.5% (95% CI 45.2–73.8%) in the nonviral infection group. The viral infection group was not a significant factor associated with the PFS or OS in a multivariate analysis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Lenvatinib shows no significant difference in response between patients with and without viral infection. Treatment strategies based on the etiology of liver disease may lead to good clinical outcome.

Systemic targeted and immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Cersosimo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Abstract Purpose The activity of targeted agents and immunotherapy in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is reviewed. Summary The first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for advanced HCC, sorafenib, was approved in 2007. Regorafenib, the second drug, was approved 10 years later. Six additional drugs have been approved since. Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the only agents approved for systemic therapy of advanced HCC. Sorafenib and lenvatinib are approved as first-line agents, with regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, nivolumab (used alone or with ipilimumab), and pembrolizumab approved for patients who have received prior sorafenib therapy. Most patients in phase 3 studies had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, and data on the use of these agents in patients with more advanced hepatic dysfunction are limited. All of the targeted agents improve survival in patients with advanced disease. Median overall survival durations of up to 12.3 and 13.6 months were reported with use of sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively, in phase 3 trials. Overall survival durations of 10.6, 10.2, and 9.2 months have been achieved with use of regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line therapy after sorafenib. A median overall survival of 13.2 months was reported in 1 cohort of a dose-expansion study of nivolumab in which all patients received prior sorafenib therapy. Median survival durations of 12.9 months and 13.9 months were reported with use of pembrolizumab in patients with a history of sorafenib therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with targeted agents are dermatological effects, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypertension. Immune-mediated adverse effects are associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the standard of therapy for patients who need systemic therapy for advanced HCC.

scholarly journals Objective Response by mRECIST is an Independent Prognostic Factor for overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in SILIUS Trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Yasutaka Chiba ◽  
Sadahisa Ogasawara ◽  
Shuntaro Obi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sorafenib Group ◽  
Landmark Analyses

Background In SILIUS (NCT01214343), combination of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with sorafenib alone. In this study, we explored the relationship between objective response by mRECIST and overall survival (OS) in the sorafenib group, in the combination group and in all patients in the SILIUS trial. Methods Association between objective response and OS in patients treated with sorafenib (n=103), combination (n=102) and all patients (n=205) were analyzed. The median OS of responders was compared with that of non-responders. Landmark analyses were performed according to objective response at several fixed time points, as sensitivity analyses, and the effect on OS was evaluated by Cox regression analysis with objective response as a time-dependent covariate, with other prognostic factors was performed. Results In the sorafenib group, OS of responders (n = 18) was significantly better than that of non-responders (n = 78) (p &lt; 0.0001), where median OS was 27.2 (95% CI, 16.0&ndash;not reached) months for responders and 8.9 (95% CI, 6.5&ndash;12.6) months for non-responders. HRs from landmark analyses at 4, 6, and 8 months were 0.45 (p=0.0330), 0.37 (p=0.0053), and 0.36 (p=0.0083), respectively. Objective response was an independent predictor of OS based on unstratified Cox regression analyses. In the all patients and the combination group, similar results were obtained. Conclusion In the SILIUS trial, objective response was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with HCC.

The use of cabozantinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Hong Kong multi-center experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 316-316
Author(s):  
Yawen Dong ◽  
Thomas Wai-Tong Leung ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

316 Background: In the phase III CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib showed significant improvement in overall survival with good tolerability in advanced HCC population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, survival and tolerability of cabozatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in a real life setting. Methods: Between February 2018 and October 2019, consecutive advanced HCC patients who received cabozatinib alone or in combination at University of Hong Kong Health System hospitals were analysed. Cabozantinib was administered at 60 mg continuously daily. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tolerability were evaluated. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included. The median age was 57.1 years (range 48.5-58.6). All patients except one were hepatitis B carriers. More than 80% of the patients had underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Most patients had metastatic disease (95.5%). More than 70% of patients received cabozantinib beyond second-line, and most of the patients had prior exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and/or immunotherapy. The median time from the start of first-line systemic treatment to the start of cabozantinib was 11.2 months. Cabozantinib was administered to 11 patients (50%) as single agent, while the other half received cabozantinib in combination with mostly immune checkpoint inhibitors. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The table below shows the ORR. The overall median TTP and OS were 4.2 and 8.90 months, respectively. Interestingly, among those who received single agent cabozantinib, the median OS was 5.36 months in contrast to 12.32 months in the patients received combination. Overall, 90.9% of patients experienced treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) with transient liver function occurred in nearly 50% patients. Nevertheless, Grade 3/4 TRAEs was only 12%. Conclusions: Our present study showed that the use of cabozatinib in advanced HCC patients had good anti-tumour activity and survival benefits with acceptable toxicity profile. [Table: see text]

Initial Experience of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
TEIJI KUZUYA ◽  
NAOTO KAWABE ◽  
SENJU HASHIMOTO ◽  
RYOJI MIYAHARA ◽  
TAKUJI NAKANO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Modified Recist ◽  
Grade 3

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib, in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Of 34 patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, a total of 23, including 16 with lenvatinib failure, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The adverse events, changes in liver function and antitumor responses at 6 weeks after starting therapy were evaluated. Results: The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was low, at 13.0%. Albumin–bilirubin scores did not worsen at 3 and 6 weeks compared to baseline. The objective response rate and disease control rate at 6 weeks were 17.4% and 78.3% according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and 30.4% and 78.3% according to modified RECIST, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab might have potential therapeutic safety and efficacy in patients with advanced HCC, including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib. Further studies are needed to confirm the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib failure.

Prognostic factors of survival in 236 advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients enrolled in prospective clinical trials of systemic therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15632-e15632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Lin ◽  
D. Chang ◽  
Y. Shao ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Staging Systems

e15632 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant disease. Promising results of prospective clinical trials using systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC are emerging. The aim of this study was to explore prognostic factors of survival in advanced HCC patients eligible for clinical trials of systemic therapy. Methods: From December 1990 to July 2005, 236 patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled into 6 phase II trials of systemic therapy using the following regimens: (1) oral etoposide + tamoxifen, (2)doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (3)IFN-α2b + doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (4)pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, (5)thalidomide, and (6)arsenic trioxide. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 23 relevant clinical characteristics/staging systems were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. Results: Baseline characteristics: median age 55; male/female: 192/44; HBsAg(+) 71%; anti-HCV(+) 30%; Okuda stage I/II/III: 42%/55%/3%; AJCC stage III/IV: 30%/61%; BCLC stage B/C/D: 1%/94%/5%; CLIP score 0–3/4–6: 70%/30%; portal vein thrombosis 53%; extrahepatic metastasis 59%; prior chemoembolization 46%. The objective response rate according to WHO criteria was 11.4%. The median overall survival was 118 days (95% CI, 103–133). In the multivariate analysis, significant predictors of a shorter overall survival were: HBsAg(+) with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.808 (95% CI, 1.121–2.916; P= 0.015), symptomatic with HR = 1.745 (95% CI, 1.072–2.840; P= 0.025), ECOG≥2 with HR = 1.763 (95% CI, 1.040–2.988; P= 0.035), and high BCLC stage with HR = 3.282 (95% CI, 1.129–9.541; P= 0.029). Conclusions: Patients with advanced HCC who are eligible for systemic therapeutic trials have patient- and disease-related prognostic factors. Positive HBsAg, symptomatic, ECOG performance≥2, and high BCLC stage predict a shorter overall survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document