scholarly journals Carpal tunnel syndrome - anatomical variations and tests for their diagnosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Veselina Mihaleva ◽  
Mariyana Mihaylova ◽  
Stoyan Pavlov ◽  
Desislava Marinova ◽  
Meglena Angelova ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e483101220884
Author(s):  
Beatriz Pereira Vaz Tamiozzo ◽  
Eduardo Tavares Lima Trajano ◽  
Marco Aurélio dos Santos Silva ◽  
Larissa Alexsandra da Silva Neto Trajano

Knowledge of a persistent median artery, defined as an anatomical vascular variation, is of clinical importance because it can be an unusual etiology of carpal tunnel syndrome. This report describes the case of a 42-year-old female patient with acute pain and paresthesia involving the volar aspect of the first, second, and third fingers of the left hand. The clinical manifestations pointed to compressive neuropathy of the median nerve, and diagnostic imaging showed anatomical vascular variation. Details were collected through interviews with the patient, and photographic records of imaging exams were thoroughly analyzed. This case study shows the importance of the identification and knowledge about anatomical variations considering that under specific pathological conditions, they can be a cause of clinical syndromes. Such knowledge is also important in the field of surgery for the prevention of iatrogenic injuries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 326-329
Author(s):  
Charaf eddine Elkassimi ◽  
Mustapha Fadili ◽  
Sami Rouadi ◽  
Abdelhak Garch

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common root canal pathology. The surgical treatment corresponds to a release of the median nerve by incision of the anterior annular ligament of the carpus by open surgical treatment or endoscopy. Knowledge of the normal anatomy and anatomical variations of the median nerve at the wrist is fundamental to avoiding complications in median nerve release in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Through this work we will show the interest of knowledge of the anatomy of the median nerve as well as its anatomical variations in order to derive the main clinical applications and to avoid the risks associated with open or endoscopic surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2513826X2094698
Author(s):  
Rashed N. AlHasan ◽  
Nayef A. Louri

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a neuropathy brought about by the entrapment and compression of the median nerve as it travels through the carpal tunnel. The hallmark of classic CTS is pain or paraesthesia (numbness, burning, or tingling) in the palmar aspect of the first 3 digits, as well as the radial aspect of the fourth digit. Although idiopathic in nature, many risk factors have been attributed to the development of CTS. These factors include diabetes mellitus, acromegaly, thyroid disease, rheumatoid arthritis, pregnancy, the use of steroids, and the repetitive use of hand and wrist. The prevalence also seems to be higher in obese women. In literature, trauma, foreign body, tumors, or anatomical variations are considered to be infrequent causes of CTS. A rare form of CTS is the acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS) that presents mainly after injuries to the upper extremities. The patient typically acknowledges trauma to the wrist secondary to a foreign body at the time of injury. In some cases, small fragments may penetrate the wrist and remain unnoticed causing acute neurological symptoms. In literature, there were limited studies that reported the development of ACTS secondary to missed foreign bodies following trauma. This report presents a case of ACTS sustained following a penetrating foreign body (pellet) to the right wrist. Removal of the foreign body resulted in complete recovery with no neurological sequelae.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. De Franco ◽  
C. Erra ◽  
G. Granata ◽  
D. Coraci ◽  
R. Padua ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Emanuele La Corte ◽  
Clarissa A. E. Gelmi ◽  
Nicola Acciarri

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment peripheral neuropathy. Median nerve may present several anatomical variations such as a high division or bifid median nerve (BMN). A thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy and variations of the median nerve at the wrist are fundamental to reduce complications during carpal tunnel release. Case Description: A 63-year-old man with CTS underwent preoperative ultrasound that showed the entrapment of the median nerve and disclosed a BMN Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variation at the carpal tunnel. During the surgery, the anatomical variant of a BMN at the wrist has been visualized. Both nervous rami entirely occupied the carpal canal and this may have predisposed to the development of the entrapment syndrome. Nor persistent median artery, or other associated abnormalities, have been identified. At the 6 months follow-up control, the patient referred a good surgical recovery with complete resolution of the preoperative symptoms of the median nerve entrapment. Conclusion: A rare case of Lanz IIIA BMN Type at the wrist has been encountered in a patient with a CTS and a systematic review and practical considerations have been presented with the aim of raising awareness to the neurosurgical community of a such rare variant that could be encountered during carpal tunnel release procedures. CTS may be caused by the entrapment of a BMN Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variant of median nerve. Preoperative US would help to identify such patients to reduce risk of iatrogenic injuries.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document