scholarly journals Identification by families of pediatric adverse events and near misses overlooked by health care providers

2011 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Daniels ◽  
K. Hunc ◽  
D. D. Cochrane ◽  
R. Carr ◽  
N. T. Shaw ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kathel Dunn ◽  
Joanne Gard Marshall ◽  
Amber L. Wells ◽  
Joyce E. B. Backus

Objective: This study analyzed data from a study on the value of libraries to understand the specific role that the MEDLINE database plays in relation to other information resources that are available to health care providers and its role in positively impacting patient care.Methods: A previous study on the use of health information resources for patient care obtained 16,122 responses from health care providers in 56 hospitals about how providers make decisions affecting patient care and the role of information resources in that process. Respondents indicated resources used in answering a specific clinical question from a list of 19 possible resources, including MEDLINE. Study data were examined using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to determine the number of information resources used and how they were used in combination with one another.Results: Health care professionals used 3.5 resources, on average, to aid in patient care. The 2 most frequently used resources were journals (print and online) and the MEDLINE database. Using a higher number of information resources was significantly associated with a higher probability of making changes to patient care and avoiding adverse events. MEDLINE was the most likely to be among consulted resources compared to any other information resource other than journals.Conclusions: MEDLINE is a critical clinical care tool that health care professionals use to avoid adverse events, make changes to patient care, and answer clinical questions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Tamburri

Adverse events may cause a patient serious harm or death; the patient becomes the first victim of these events. The health care providers who become traumatized by the events are the second victims. These second victims experience feelings such as guilt, shame, sadness, and grief, which can lead to profound personal and professional consequences. An organizational culture of blame and a lack of support can intensify the provider’s suffering. Second victims, as they move through predictable stages of recovery, can be positively influenced by a supportive organizational culture and the compassionate actions of peers, managers, advanced practice nurses, educators, and senior leaders. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Healthy Work Environment standards provide a framework for specific actions health care professionals should take to support colleagues during their recovery from adverse events.


2013 ◽  
Vol 162 (6) ◽  
pp. 1276-1281.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Elizabeth Williams ◽  
Kathryn M. Edwards ◽  
Roger P. Baxter ◽  
Philip S. LaRussa ◽  
Neal A. Halsey ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
L.V. Wynn ◽  
M.A. Bell ◽  
D.A. Bakari ◽  
D.P.S. Oppong ◽  
M.J. Youngblood ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0198169
Author(s):  
April J. Bell ◽  
Lynette V. Wynn ◽  
Ashura Bakari ◽  
Samuel A. Oppong ◽  
Jessica Youngblood ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Deutschbein ◽  
M Möckel ◽  
L Schenk

Abstract Background Patients aged 65 and above are the fastest growing patient population in Europe. This is one of greatest challenges for almost all health services providers, including acute hospitals and their Emergency Departments (ED). As of today, older patients represent up to 30% of all ED patients, it is estimated. However, it is largely unclear to what degree EDs are currently prepared for older patients and how they need to adjust. This study analyses the present situation from the perspective of health care professionals caring for older ED patients. Methods The study was embedded in a mixed methods design using qualitative expert interviews. N = 25 semi-structured, guided interviews were conducted with professional health care providers from 7 Berlin EDs (physicians, nurses), and adjacent health care sectors such as nursing homes, rehabilitation clinics, and medical practices. Interviewees were asked about their daily experiences with older ED patients and their ideas of health care deficits and potentials. Data was analyzed using content analysis and hermeneutics. Results Health care providers assess the ED care situation for older patients and the necessity of adjustments in different ways but mostly as deficient. EDs are described as not elderly-friendly and partly as hazardous: older patients are at risk of adverse events such as developing a delirium. Risk factors are prolonged length of stay, the busy and noisy ED setting, and falls hazards. In general, ED staffing is not adequate to care for older patients with complex needs. Conclusions Considering demographic change, German Eds need to concentrate on the growing number of oder patients and their specific needs. Further research and development of specific care concepts for older ED patients is strongly needed. Potential adjustments of ED structures and care concepts also need to involve patients’ experiences and subjective needs. However, data on the patient perspective is still missing. Key messages Older patients and demographic change represent great challenges for EDs. Care concepts need to be developed to meet older patients needs and to avoid risks of adverse events.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan H. Daniels ◽  
Satoshi Kawaguchi ◽  
Alec G. Contag ◽  
Farbod Rastegar ◽  
Garrett Waagmeester ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Beginning in 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) determined that certain hospital-acquired adverse events such as surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery should never occur. The following year, they expanded the ruling to include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) following total joint arthroplasty. Due to their ruling that “never events” are not the payers' responsibility, CMS insists that the costs of managing these complications be borne by hospitals and health care providers, rather than billings to health care payers for additional care required in their management. Data comparing the expected costs of such adverse events in patients undergoing spine and orthopedic surgery have not previously been reported. METHODS The California State Inpatient Database (CA-SID) from 2008 to 2009 was used for the analysis. All patients with primary procedure codes indicating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), lumbar laminectomy (LL), total knee replacement (TKR), and total hip replacement (THR) were analyzed. Patients with diagnostic and/or treatment codes for DVT, PE, and SSI were separated from patients without these complication codes. Patients with more than 1 primary procedure code or more than 1 complication code were excluded. Median charges for treatment from primary surgery through 3 months postoperatively were calculated. RESULTS The incidence of the examined adverse events was lowest for ACDF (0.6% DVT, 0.1% PE, and 0.03% SSI) and highest for TKA (1.3% DVT, 0.3% PE, 0.6% SSI). Median inpatient charges for uncomplicated LL was $51,817, compared with $73,432 for ACDF, $143,601 for PLIF, $74,459 for THR, and $70,116 for TKR. Charges for patients with DVT ranged from $108,387 for TKR (1.5 times greater than index) to $313,536 for ACDF (4.3 times greater than index). Charges for patients with PE ranged from $127,958 for TKR (1.8 times greater than index) to $246,637 for PLIF (1.7 times greater than index). Charges for patients with SSI ranged from $168,964 for TKR (2.4 times greater than index) to $385,753 for PLIF (2.7 times greater than index). CONCLUSIONS Although incidence rates are low, adverse events of spinal procedures substantially increase the cost of care. Charges for patients experiencing DVT, PE, and SSI increased in this study by factors ranging from 1.8 to 4.3 times those for patients without such complications across 5 common spinal and orthopedic procedures. Cost projections by health care providers will need to incorporate expected costs of added care for patients experiencing such complications, assuming that the cost burden of such events continues to shift from payers to providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document