The effect of different sets of critical values on type I error rates in tiled regression for genome-wide association studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Heejong Sung ◽  
Jeremy A. Sabourin ◽  
Alexa J.M. Sorant ◽  
Alexander F. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Critical Values ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Type I Error Rates ◽  
Genome Wide

scholarly journals Efficient mixed model approach for large-scale genome-wide association studies of ordinal categorical phenotypes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjian Bi ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Rounak Dey ◽  
Bhramar Mukherjee ◽  
Joshua N Sampson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Model ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Type I Error Rates ◽  
Genome Wide

AbstractIn genome-wide association studies (GWAS), ordinal categorical phenotypes are widely used to measure human behaviors, satisfaction, and preferences. However, due to the lack of analysis tools, methods designed for binary and quantitative traits have often been used inappropriately to analyze categorical phenotypes, which produces inflated type I error rates or is less powerful. To accurately model the dependence of an ordinal categorical phenotype on covariates, we propose an efficient mixed model association test, Proportional Odds Logistic Mixed Model (POLMM). POLMM is demonstrated to be computationally efficient to analyze large datasets with hundreds of thousands of genetic related samples, can control type I error rates at a stringent significance level regardless of the phenotypic distribution, and is more powerful than other alternative methods. We applied POLMM to 258 ordinal categorical phenotypes on array-genotypes and imputed samples from 408,961 individuals in UK Biobank. In total, we identified 5,885 genome-wide significant variants, of which 424 variants (7.2%) are rare variants with MAF < 0.01.

scholarly journals Multi-trait genome-wide analyses of the brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Type I Error Rates ◽  
Trait Association ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Inflation Factor

AbstractMany genetic variants identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are associated with multiple, sometimes seemingly unrelated traits. This motivates multi-trait association analyses, which have successfully identified novel associated loci for many complex diseases. While appealing, most existing methods focus on analyzing a relatively small number of traits and may yield inflated Type I error rates when a large number of traits need to be analyzed jointly. As deep phenotyping data are becoming rapidly available, we develop a novel method, referred to as aMAT (adaptive multi-trait association test), for multi-trait analysis of any number of traits. We applied aMAT to GWAS summary statistics for a set of 58 volumetric imaging derived phenotypes from the UK Biobank. aMAT had a genomic inflation factor of 1.04, indicating the Type I error rates were well controlled. More important, aMAT identified 24 distinct risk loci, 13 of which were ignored by standard GWAS. In comparison, the competing methods either had a suspicious genomic inflation factor or identified much fewer risk loci. Finally, four additional sets of traits have been analyzed and provided similar conclusions.

scholarly journals Statistical Learning Methods Applicable to Genome-Wide Association Studies on Unbalanced Case-Control Disease Data

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 736
Author(s):  
Xiaotian Dai ◽  
Guifang Fu ◽  
Shaofei Zhao ◽  
Yifei Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Control Disease

Despite the fact that imbalance between case and control groups is prevalent in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it is often overlooked. This imbalance is getting more significant and urgent as the rapid growth of biobanks and electronic health records have enabled the collection of thousands of phenotypes from large cohorts, in particular for diseases with low prevalence. The unbalanced binary traits pose serious challenges to traditional statistical methods in terms of both genomic selection and disease prediction. For example, the well-established linear mixed models (LMM) yield inflated type I error rates in the presence of unbalanced case-control ratios. In this article, we review multiple statistical approaches that have been developed to overcome the inaccuracy caused by the unbalanced case-control ratio, with the advantages and limitations of each approach commented. In addition, we also explore the potential for applying several powerful and popular state-of-the-art machine-learning approaches, which have not been applied to the GWAS field yet. This review paves the way for better analysis and understanding of the unbalanced case-control disease data in GWAS.

scholarly journals ComPaSS-GWAS: A method to reduce type I error in genome-wide association studies when replication data are not available

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy A. Sabourin ◽  
Cheryl D. Cropp ◽  
Heejong Sung ◽  
Lawrence C. Brody ◽  
Joan E. Bailey-Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide

scholarly journals Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies

BMC Genetics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Yang ◽  
Jing Cui ◽  
Irmarie Chazaro ◽  
L Adrienne Cupples ◽  
Serkalem Demissie
Keyword(s):  
False Discovery Rate ◽  
Error Rate ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Type I Error Rate ◽  
False Discovery ◽  
Genome Wide

scholarly journals Operating Characteristics of the Rank-Based Inverse Normal Transformation for Quantitative Trait Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Studies

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary R. McCaw ◽  
Jacqueline M. Lane ◽  
Richa Saxena ◽  
Susan Redline ◽  
Xihong Lin
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Type I ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Association Tests ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Normal Transformation ◽  
Normally Distributed

SummaryQuantitative traits analyzed in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are often non-normally distributed. For such traits, association tests based on standard linear regression are subject to reduced power and inflated type I error in finite samples. Applying the rank-based Inverse Normal Transformation (INT) to non-normally distributed traits has become common practice in GWAS. However, the different variations on INT-based association testing have not been formally defined, and guidance is lacking on when to use which approach. In this paper, we formally define and systematically compare the direct (D-INT) and indirect (I-INT) INT-based association tests. We discuss their assumptions, underlying generative models, and connections. We demonstrate that the relative powers of D-INT and I-INT depend on the underlying data generating process. Since neither approach is uniformly most powerful, we combine them into an adaptive omnibus test (O-INT). O-INT is robust to model misspecification, protects the type I error, and is well powered against a wide range of non-normally distributed traits. Extensive simulations were conducted to examine the finite sample operating characteristics of these tests. Our results demonstrate that, for non-normally distributed traits, INT-based tests outperform the standard untransformed association test (UAT), both in terms of power and type I error rate control. We apply the proposed methods to GWAS of spirometry traits in the UK Biobank. O-INT has been implemented in the R package RNOmni, which is available on CRAN.

scholarly journals A comparative analysis of cell-type adjustment methods for epigenome-wide association studies based on simulated and real data sets

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 2055-2065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Brägelmann ◽  
Justo Lorenzo Bermejo
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Power ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Type I Error Rates

Abstract Technological advances and reduced costs of high-density methylation arrays have led to an increasing number of association studies on the possible relationship between human disease and epigenetic variability. DNA samples from peripheral blood or other tissue types are analyzed in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) to detect methylation differences related to a particular phenotype. Since information on the cell-type composition of the sample is generally not available and methylation profiles are cell-type specific, statistical methods have been developed for adjustment of cell-type heterogeneity in EWAS. In this study we systematically compared five popular adjustment methods: the factored spectrally transformed linear mixed model (FaST-LMM-EWASher), the sparse principal component analysis algorithm ReFACTor, surrogate variable analysis (SVA), independent SVA (ISVA) and an optimized version of SVA (SmartSVA). We used real data and applied a multilayered simulation framework to assess the type I error rate, the statistical power and the quality of estimated methylation differences according to major study characteristics. While all five adjustment methods improved false-positive rates compared with unadjusted analyses, FaST-LMM-EWASher resulted in the lowest type I error rate at the expense of low statistical power. SVA efficiently corrected for cell-type heterogeneity in EWAS up to 200 cases and 200 controls, but did not control type I error rates in larger studies. Results based on real data sets confirmed simulation findings with the strongest control of type I error rates by FaST-LMM-EWASher and SmartSVA. Overall, ReFACTor, ISVA and SmartSVA showed the best comparable statistical power, quality of estimated methylation differences and runtime.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document