scholarly journals Perception of risk of natural hazards: a hazard mitigation plan framework

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maura Ann Hurley ◽  
Ross B. Corotis
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 101164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gala Avvisati ◽  
Eliana Bellucci Sessa ◽  
Orazio Colucci ◽  
Barbara Marfè ◽  
Enrica Marotta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 6310
Author(s):  
Sanja Kovačić ◽  
Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint ◽  
Ruxandra Ionce ◽  
Đurđa Miljković

During the summer season 2018 and 2019, natural hazards (namely, floods and wildfires) have occurred at some of the most popular tourist destinations in Greece, endangering tourists’ safety and vacation quality. These have influenced tourists’ perception of Greece as a “potentially risky destination”, causing a decrease in the number of tourists willing to visit this country. However, the current study assumes that some tourists will show more courageous travel behavior in the aftermath of natural hazards, while others will remain cautious when deciding to travel to risky destinations. Therefore, the questionnaire on a sample group of 431 respondents from Serbia and Romania was conducted to explore the factors influencing such differences. The study aims to explore whether tourists’ individual characteristics influence tourism worries and tourist behavior based on perceived risks. The study also intends to analyze the moderating role of tourists’ nationality, considering the relationship between personality and tourist behavior based on the perceived risk. The findings provide evidence that not only tourists’ personality but also sociodemographic characteristics influence tourism worries and tourist behavior based on the perceived risk. Additionally, the study is the first to explore and confirm the role of nationality in tourist behavior based on the perceived risk, as well as the moderation role of nationality in regression between tourist’s personality and behavior based on the perception of risk. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the paper.


Author(s):  
Jack Lindsay

The responsibility for hazard governance in Canada is indirectly determined by the division of subjects in the Constitution Act of 1867. This is because emergency management is not a distinct constitutional subject, and therefore it is a matter of assessing which subjects are most related to the practices of emergency management. As a result of this uncertainty both the provincial and federal governments have emergency management legislation. The various provincial legislation and the federal Emergencies Act of 1988 are primarily focused on providing for the use of extraordinary powers as part of crisis response. The federal Emergency Management Act 2008 does take a more comprehensive approach that includes hazard mitigation, but its reach only extends to federal departments. The governance tools most applicable to hazard management, such as land-use planning and zoning, are normally found within the Provinces’ planning or municipal legislation. The planning legislation empowers local authorities to manage development and its interaction with the natural environment. However, these powers are seldom directed towards hazard mitigation. If there is a reference to natural hazards in the planning legislation it is usually to specific risks, such as flooding or slope failure, that are spatially bounded risks to development. This separation of hazard governance in the legislation is reflected in local government practices. In most provinces emergency managers are not required by their respective legislation to incorporate hazard mitigation into community emergency programs. The planning legislation, however, seldom extends the community planner’s mandate for mitigation beyond the concerns for safe building sites and the separation of incompatible land uses. The responsibility to prevent human development from interacting with the extremes of the natural environment, or more succinctly “hazard governance,” is not clearly assigned in Canada.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 14153-14185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Shim ◽  
Chun-Il Kim

Social Forces ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Gary A. Kreps ◽  
Peter H. Rossi ◽  
James D. Wright ◽  
Eleanor Weber-Burdin

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khairunnisa Khairunnisa ◽  
Yusya Abubakar ◽  
Didik Sugianto

Akbar, A., Ma'rif, S. (2014). Arah Perkembangan Kawasan Perumahan Pasca Bencana Tsunami di Kota Banda Aceh. Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 3(2), 274-284.Bandrova, T., Zlatanova, S., Konecny, M. (2012). Three-dimensional maps for disaster management. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume I-2, XXII ISPRS Congress, August-September 2012, pp. 19-24. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.BNPB. (2012). Menuju Indonesia Tangguh Tsunami. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.BNPB. (2016). Kebijakan dan Strategi Penanggulangan Bencana 2015-2019 (Jakstra PB).BPBA. (2015). Kajian Risiko Bencana Aceh 2016-2020.BPBD. (2017). Rencana Pengurangan Bencana. Banda Aceh.BRR. (2005). Program Blueprint Aceh.Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., Barbat, A. H. (2007). A Disaster Risk Management Performance Index. Natural Hazards, 41(1), 1-20.Danugroho, A., Umamah, N., Pratama, A. R. (2020). Aceh Tsunami and Government Policy in Handling It: A Historical Study. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 485, No. 1, p. 012140). IOP Publishing.Febriana, D. S., Abubakar, Y. (2015). Kesiapsiagaan Masyarakat Desa Siaga Bencana dalam Menghadapi Bencana Gempa Bumi di Kecamatan Meuraxa Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmu Kebencanaan: Program Pascasarjana Unsyiah, 2(3).Gadeng, A. N., Furqan, M. H. (2019). The Development of Settlement in the Tsunami Red Zone Area of Banda Aceh City. KnE Social Sciences, 1-13.Godschalk, D., Bohl, C. C., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D., Kaiser, E. J. (1999). Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy and Planning. Island press.Goltz, J., Yamori, K. (2020). Tsunami Preparedness and Mitigation Strategies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science.Herrmann, G. (2013). Regulation of Coastal Zones and Natural Disasters: Mitigating the Impact of Tsunamis in Chile Through Urban and Regional Planning. Issues in Legal Scholarship, 11(1), 29-44.Jain, Garima., Singh, Chandni and Malani, T. (2017). Rethinking Post-disaster Relocation in Urban India. International Institute for Environment and Development.Kafle, S. K. (2006). Rapid Disaster Risk Assessment of Coastal Communities: A Case Study of Mutiara Village, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Environment and Disaster Management Held in Jakarta, Indonesia on December (pp. 5-8).Mardiatno, D., Malawani, M. N., Annisa, D. N., Wacano, D. (2017). Review on Tsunami Risk Reduction in Indonesia Based on Coastal and Settlement Typology. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(2), 186-197.Marlyono, S. G. (2017). Peranan Literasi Informasi Bencana terhadap Kesiapsiagaan Bencana Masyarakat Jawa Barat. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 16(2), 116-123.Oktari, R. S., Nugroho, A., Fahmi, M., Suppasri, A., Munadi, K., Amra, R. (2021). Fifteen years of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami in Aceh-Indonesia: Mitigation, preparedness and challenges for a long-term disaster recovery process. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, 102052.Peacock, W. G. and H. R. (2011). The Adoption and Implementation of Hazard Mitigation Policies and Strategies by Coastal Jurisdictions in Texas: The Planning Survey Results. Retrieved from http/TheAdoptionandImplementationofHazardMitigationPoliciesandStrategiesbyCoastalJurisdictionsinTexasDec2011.pdfPemerintah Kota Banda Aceh. (2009).Rencana Tata Ruang dan Wilayah (RTRW) Kota Banda Aceh 2009-2029.Priyowidodo, G., Luik, J. E. (2013). Literasi mitigasi bencana tsunami untuk masyarakat pesisir di Kabupaten Pacitan Jawa Timur. Ekotrans, 13(1), 47-61.PU, K. (2015). Rancangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur dan Inventaris Jangka Menengah (RPI-2JM) Bidang Cipta Karya 2015-2019.Sambah, A. B., Miura, F. (2019). Geo Spatial Analysis for Tsunami Risk Mapping. In Advanced Remote Sensing Technology for Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications, Tsunami Disasters, and Infrastructure. IntechOpen.Schwab, A. K., Sandler, D., Brower, D. J. (2016). Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness: An Introductory Text For Emergency Management and Planning Professionals. CRC Press.Shigenobu, T., Istiyanto, D., Kuribayashi, D. (2009). Sustainable Tsunami Risk Reduction and Utilization of Tsunami Hazard Map (THM).Strunz, G., Post, J., Zosseder, K., Wegscheider, S., Mück, M., Riedlinger, T., ... Muhari, A. (2011). Tsunami Risk Assessment in Indonesia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(1), 67-82.Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R D). Bandung: Alfabeta.Sunarto, S., Marfai, M. A. (2012). Potensi Bencana Tsunami dan Kesiapsiagaan Masyarakat Menghadapi Bencana Studi Kasus Desa Sumberagung Banyuwangi Jawa Timur. In Forum Geografi (Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 17-28).Syamsidik, Nugroho, A., Suryani, R., Fahmi., M. (2019). Aceh Pasca 15 Tahun Bencana Tsunami: Kilas Balik dan Proses Pemulihan. Banda Aceh: Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center (TDMRC).Torani, S., Majd, P. M., Maroufi, S. S., Dowlati, M., Sheikhi, R. A. (2019). The Importance of Education on Disasters and Emergencies: A review article. Journal of Education and Health promotion, 8.Triatmadja, R. (2011). Tsunami: Kejadian, Penjalaran, Daya Rusak, dan Mitigasinya. Gadjah Mada University Press.Widianto, A., Damen, M. (2014). Determination of Coastal Belt in the Disaster Prone Area: A Case Study in The Coastal Area of Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 46(2), 125.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document