Direct true lumen cannulation for type A aortic dissection (Samurai technique) in emergency scenarios

2021 ◽  

Choosing the optimal arterial cannulation site in type A aortic dissection may be challenging. Aortic dissection is a dynamic condition that can change at any time. Thus all the alternatives available should be known by surgeons in order to adapt to the possible problems that may arise. In this video tutorial, we present a patient with acute type A aortic dissection who, after cardiopulmonary bypass with axillary arterial cannulation, developed a major complication: intraoperative malperfusion due to pressurization of the false lumen. The patient developed occlusion of the right coronary artery with electrocardiogram changes, inferior akinesia, and ventricular arrhythmias. Cerebral saturation was also significantly decreased. This scenario of acute malperfusion calls for immediate action. We proceeded to switch the cardiopulmonary bypass configuration from axillary to direct true lumen cannulation. This technique, also known as the Samurai technique, is feasible in most cases and advantageous in this emergency situation, allowing prompt reestablishment of adequate perfusion of the true lumen . Some authors even advocate more widespread use of this technique because it may ensure antegrade perfusion while avoiding progression of the dissection flap and reduce the rate of the most common complications of other cannulation sites such as plexus injury during axillary cannulation or cerebral embolization through mobilization of thrombi or calcification from femoral retrograde perfusion. This technique is useful in cases of circumferential dissection and in patients with relative contraindications for peripheral cannulation such as morbid obesity or peripheral arterial occlusion by atherosclerosis or by the dissection itself.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
He Zhang ◽  
Wei Xie ◽  
Yuzhou Lu ◽  
Tuo Pan ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD.Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n=341) and RAC group (n=90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups.Results: Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55±13.21 vs. 56.07±12.16 years, P<0.001 ) . DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P=0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P=0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P=0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P=0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P=0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25-45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P=0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P=0.05), and the time of cooling (P=0.04) and rewarming (P=0.04) were shorter in DAC group.Conclusions: DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
He Zhang ◽  
Wei Xie ◽  
Yuzhou Lu ◽  
Tuo Pan ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n = 341) and RAC group (n = 90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups. Results Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55 ± 13.21 vs. 56.07 ± 12.16 years, P < 0.001). DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P = 0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P = 0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25–45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P = 0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P = 0.05), and the time of cooling (P = 0.04) and rewarming (P = 0.04) were shorter in DAC group. Conclusions DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.


Aorta ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. 115-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sotiris Stamou ◽  
Derek Gartner ◽  
Nicholas Kouchoukos ◽  
Kevin Lobdell ◽  
Kamal Khabbaz ◽  
...  

Background: The goal of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and actuarial-free survival between patients who underwent repair of acute Type A aortic dissection with axillary or femoral artery cannulation. Methods: A total of 305 patients from five academic medical centers underwent acute Type A aortic dissection repair via axillary (n = 107) or femoral (n = 198) artery cannulation between January 2000 and December 2010. Major morbidity, operative mortality, and 5-year actuarial survival were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of operative mortality, and Cox regression hazard ratios were calculated to determine predictors of long-term mortality. Results: Operative mortality was not influenced by cannulation site (16% for axillary cannulation vs. 19% for femoral cannulation, p = 0.64). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, hemodynamic instability (p < 0.001) and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (>200 min; p = 0.05) emerged as independent predictors of operative mortality. Stroke rates were comparable between the two techniques (14% for axillary and 17% for femoral cannulation, p = 0.52). Five-year actuarial survival was comparable between the groups (55.1% for axillary and 65.7% for femoral cannulation, p = 0.36). In Cox regression analysis, predictors of long-term mortality were: age (p < 0.001), stroke (p < 0.001), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.001), hemodynamic instability (p = 0.002), and renal failure (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The outcomes of femoral versus axillary arterial cannulation in patients with acute Type A aortic dissection are comparable. The choice of arterial cannulation site should be individualized based on different patient risk profiles.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saina Attaran ◽  
Maria Safar ◽  
Hesham Zayed Saleh ◽  
Mark Field ◽  
Manoj Kuduvalli ◽  
...  

<p>Management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection remains a major surgical challenge. Directly cannulating the ascending aorta provides a rapid establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass but consists of risks such as complete rupture of the aorta, false lumen cannulation, subsequent malperfusion and propagation of the dissection.</p><p>We describe a technique of cannulating the ascending aorta in patients with acute aortic dissection that can be performed rapidly in hemodynamically unstable patients under ultrasound-epiaortic and transesophageal (TEE) guidance.</p>


Surgery Today ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Kurimoto ◽  
Kiyofumi Morishita ◽  
Nobuyoshi Kawaharada ◽  
Johji Fukada ◽  
Yasufumi Asai ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Igor Vendramin ◽  
Daniela Piani ◽  
Andrea Lechiancole ◽  
Nunzio Davide de Manna ◽  
Sandro Sponga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document