§ 20 Die Idee der Welt-AG: Das Business Combination Agreement von Daimler-Benz/Chrysler

Author(s):  
Holger Fleischer ◽  
Konstantin Horn
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Hopkins ◽  
Richard W. Houston ◽  
Michael F. Peters

We provide evidence that analysts' stock-price judgments depend on (1) the method of accounting for a business combination and (2) the number of years that have elapsed since the business combination. Consistent with business-press reports of managers' concerns, analysts' stock-price judgments are lowest when a company applies the purchase method of accounting and ratably amortizes the acquisition premium. The number of years since the business combination affects analysts' price estimates only when the company applies the purchase method and ratably amortizes goodwill—analysts' price estimates are lower when the business-combination transaction is further in the past. However, this joint effect of accounting method and timing is mitigated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's proposed income-statement format requiring companies to report separate line items for after-tax income before goodwill charges and net-of-tax goodwill charges. When a company uses the purchase method of accounting and writes off the acquisition premium as in-process research and development, analysts' stockprice judgments are not statistically different from their judgments when a company applies pooling-of-interest accounting.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schmidbauer

For transnational mergers of listed corporations, the merger of equals procedure is chosen frequently. This thesis comprehensively deals with the delimitation of the competences of the board of directors and the general meeting of a listed stock corporation in the case of the merger of equals. It is examined whether the conclusion of the business combination agreement requires the approval of the general meeting or whether it falls exclusively within the competence of the board of directors. Furthermore, it is examined whether the merger as such falls within the competences of the general meeting, in particular whether the merger establishes unwritten competences of the general meeting.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Al-Hiyari ◽  
Rohaida Abdul Latif ◽  
Noor Afza Amran

The accounting rules prescribed in Malaysian Financial Reporting Standard (MFRS) 3, Business combination, and (MFRS) 136, Impairment of Assets, give managers considerable reporting discretion in allocating goodwill and estimating its actual value. Agency theory predicts that managers may use the accounting discretion granted by the new rules to pursue their own interests at the expense of shareholders. Hence, auditors are required to exercise professional judgement when investigating hard-to-verify management assumptions and valuations. We exploit this issue by examining whether predictive ability of goodwill improved in the presence of Big 4 auditors. We provide evidence that goodwill has a significant predictive ability for second and third-year ahead cash flows which exists only in the firms audited by the large international reputable accounting firms. This suggests that Big 4 auditors play an important role in ensuring appropriate implementation of the present accounting for goodwill.


TEME ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Dejan Spasić ◽  
Anton Vorina

The aim of the research is to achieve a conclusion what is the level of the reporting practice on intangible assets in two countries - in the Republic of Serbia and in the Republic of Slovenia trough a comparative descriptive statistics. Consolidated financial statements of listed companies in these two countries were used from the Belgrade Stock Exchange (Serbia) and the Ljubljana Stock Exchange (Slovenia). The reason for the use of consolidated financial statements lies in the fact that they can contain unconsolidated intangible assets already recognized in the separate financial statements of the companies included in the group, as well as internally generated intangible assets that meet the conditions for recognition in a business combination (including Goodwill). The general assessment is that the survey results indicate a very low level of reporting practice of intangible assets in Serbia and relatively satisfactory level of reporting practice in Slovenia. Individual results are given in the fourth part of the paper. 


Author(s):  
Florentina Moisescu ◽  
Аnа-Mаriа Golomoz

<p>This paper deals with the results of the businesses combinations and the advantages felt in solving the problems of certain entities, the extension on other markets or obtaining increased quotas on the market. Also, businesses combinations can generate disadvantages regarding the access to credits or negative effects on the salary. A business combination is based on taking risks an has advantages as well as disadvantages, on both the short and the long term, while the decision of making it has in view the development strategy of the organisation. The aim of the paper is to analyze and balance the benefits and disadvantages of business combinations. It is questioned the need to use this method and its use only for the advantages obtained despite the existing disadvantages.</p>


Author(s):  
David Kershaw

The Chapter considers Code regulation of the bid timetable as well as its regulation of the information provided to shareholders and stakeholders as part of the bid process. With regard to time regulation the Chapter details the Code’s bid timetable for contractual offers and schemes: from the commencement of the offer period, the competing bid timetables, to the payment of consideration. The Chapter explores and challenges the assumptions about investors and market practice on which this time regulation is premised. The Chapter then turns to disclosure. It explores and details the types of disclosure required in relation to the bid itself and of the bidder and target companies, and explores the techniques deployed by the Code to ensure the accuracy, and informativeness, of the disclosures. The Chapter argues that for mandatory takeover bid disclosures to be justified they must be additive, informative in practice and actually used. The Chapter raises questions about whether all Code disclosures comply with these criteria. Particular concerns are raised about predictive information relating to the commercial effects of the business combination as well as the effects on employment and business location. The Chapter submits that practical business considerations and concerns about ex-post reputational damage where reality departs from prediction (as well as concerns about ex-post enforcement action by the Panel, results in disclosures that are often uninformative, benefiting only those who are paid for producing them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document