Trisetum Calcinosis: Current Status of Clinical Research

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1461-1472
Author(s):  
L. Horavova ◽  
K. Nebeska ◽  
L. Souckova ◽  
R. Demlova ◽  
P. Babula

Abstract Introduction Paediatric non-commercial interventional clinical trials (NICTs) are crucial for healthcare provision. In spite of the fact that current regulations and initiatives try to enhance the quantity and quality of paediatric NICTs, there are still shortcomings that need to be addressed in order to accelerate the conduct of relevant clinical trials in children. To improve the current landscape of paediatric clinical research, it is necessary to identify and analyse the main trends and shortcomings, along with their impact on national performance in paediatric NICTs and this is the aim of this work. Method A retrospective systematic search of paediatric NICTs was performed on four international clinical trials registries. Entries were filtered by date from 01/01/2004 to 31/12/2017. Each identified paediatric NICT was screened and analysed for sponsors, funders, type of intervention, therapeutic area, design characteristics and associated publications. Results The search identified 439 unique NICTs. When stratifying the trials by enrolment ages, 86 trials were found involving the paediatric population. Most trials investigated the use of medicinal products and were focused on cancer or cardiovascular diseases. The most common sources of the funding were non-profit organizations. Furthermore, from the total number of completed trials, only half of them already published their results. Conclusion The main shortcomings—specifically, ethical, methodological and, in particular, economic obstacles were identified. There is a continual need for greater support and collaboration between all major stakeholders including health policymakers, grant agencies, research institutions, pharmaceutical industries and healthcare providers at the national and international level.


2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 456-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Arulampalam ◽  
S Paterson-Brown ◽  
AJ Morris ◽  
MC Parker

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has generated healthy and vigorous debate about the introduction of an entirely novel method of surgical therapy. Although there are many reasons for scepticism, there is undoubted interest in this field from both the medical profession and general public. Those Associations currently involved in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery wish to safeguard patients and the reputation of the profession by issuing clear guidance and support for those wishing to undertake NOTES. The purpose of this document is to review the current status of both NOTES and hybrid NOTES, while at the same time identifying obstacles in both clinical research and training. Furthermore, it aims to provide a consensus statement on behalf of the main UK specialty associations involved in this field of surgery. The primary aim of this consensus statement is to provide a framework within which to develop, safely and effectively, what must still be considered an experimental technique.


2015 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 63-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. Nienhuis ◽  
S.B.M. Gaykema ◽  
H. Timmer-Bosscha ◽  
M. Jalving ◽  
A.H. Brouwers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ihn Sook Jeong ◽  
Sangmin Choe ◽  
Ji Hong Shon ◽  
Won Ock Kim

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kroke ◽  
H Boeing ◽  
K Rossnagel ◽  
SN Willich

AbstractPrimary prevention is a major option to reduce the burden of chronic disease in populations. Because lifestyle interventions have proved to be effective, lifestyle recommendations including nutritional advice are made abundantly. However, both their credibility and their effectiveness are often considered not to be high. Therefore, scientific evidence should form the basis of recommendations and, as in clinical medicine, a rational approach should be followed for the evaluation of evidence. In this paper, the development and current concepts of ‘levels of evidence’ as they are applied in clinical medicine are outlined and their impact on evidence-based recommendations is discussed. Next, the question is raised as to how far the existing schemes are applicable to the evaluation of issues pertaining to primary prevention through lifestyle changes. Current schemes were developed mainly for clinical research questions and therefore place major emphasis on randomised controlled trials as the main and most convincing evidence in the evaluation process. These types of study are rarely available for lifestyle-related factors and might even not be feasible to obtain. Arguments are advanced to support the notion that a modification of currently existing ‘levels of evidence’ as developed for clinical research questions might be necessary. Thereby, one might be able to accommodate the specific aspects of evidence-related issues of recommendations for primary prevention through lifestyle changes, like dietary changes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Damoiseaux ◽  
Andre Altmann ◽  
Jonas Richiardi ◽  
Sepideh Sadaghiani

Structural and functional brain connectomics are considered a basis for an individual's behavior and cognition. Therefore, deviations from typical connectivity patterns may indicate disease processes, and can potentially serve as disease biomarkers. To date, the direct clinical application of brain connectivity measures for diagnostics or treatment is limited. Nonetheless, the extant literature on fundamental and clinical research applications reveals important advances in our understanding of typical and atypical brain structure and function. In this chapter we discuss the current status of the field regarding: (1) the impact of the connectome on cognitive processes and behavior, (2) the connectome across the lifespan, and (3) clinical research applications of connectomics. In addition, we highlight some limitations of connectomics for research and clinical translation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document