scholarly journals New progress in understanding the cellular mechanisms of anti-arrhythmic drugs

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 335-339
Author(s):  
Zhe An ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
Xuanxuan Liu ◽  
Zhongfan Zhang ◽  
Guohui Liu

AbstractAntiarrhythmic drugs are widely used, however, their efficacy is moderate and they can have serious side effects. Even if catheter ablation is effective for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, antiarrhythmic drugs are still important tools for the treatment of arrhythmia. Despite efforts, the development of antiarrhythmic drugs is still slow due to the limited understanding of the role of various ionic currents. This review summarizes the new targets and mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drugs.

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Richard Schilling ◽  

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is linked to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. While rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) is a common strategy for managing patients with AF, catheter ablation may be a more efficacious and safer alternative to AADs for sinus rhythm control. Conventional catheter ablation has been associated with challenges during the arrhythmia mapping and ablation stages; however, the introduction of two remote catheter navigation systems (a robotic and a magnetic navigation system) may potentially overcome these challenges. Initial clinical experience with the robotic navigation system suggests that it offers similar procedural times, efficacy and safety to conventional manual ablation. Furthermore, it has been associated with reduced fluoroscopy exposure to the patient and the operator as well as a shorter fluoroscopy time compared with conventional catheter ablation. In the future, the remote navigation systems may become routinely used for complex catheter ablation procedures.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2173-2177
Author(s):  
Chawannuch Ruaengsri ◽  
Matthew R. Schill ◽  
Richard B. Schuessler ◽  
Ralph J. Damiano

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation was introduced in 1987 and has since become well established as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and/or catheter ablation or patients who are having concomitant cardiac surgical procedures. The Cox–Maze procedure has been improved upon by modern variations using ablation devices. More limited ablation procedures and hybrid procedures have been introduced, but their efficacy requires further investigation.


Author(s):  
Mazhar Warraich ◽  
Christina Peter ◽  
Mahmood Ahmad ◽  
Shazaib Sheikh ◽  
George R Abraham ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document