scholarly journals Ridge Splitting Technique for Horizontal Augmentation and Immediate Implant Placement

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Ioannis Papathanasiou ◽  
Georgios Vasilakos ◽  
Sotirios Baltiras ◽  
Lampros Zouloumis

Abstract Insufficient width of the alveolar ridge often prevents ideal implant placement. Guided bone regeneration, bone grafting, alveolar ridge splitting and combinations of these techniques are used for the lateral augmentation of the alveolar ridge. Ridge splitting is a minimally invasive technique indicated for alveolar ridges with adequate height, which enables immediate implant placement and eliminates morbidity and overall treatment time. The classical approach of the technique involves splitting the alveolar ridge into 2 parts with use of ostetomes and chisels. Modifications of this technique include the use of rotating instrument, screw spreaders, horizontal spreaders and ultrasonic device. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly describe all the different approaches in ridge splitting technique. 2 interesting clinical cases of narrow alveolar ridges treated with ridge splitting and immediate implant placement are also presented.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
N Agarwal ◽  
U Y Pai ◽  
S J Rodrigues ◽  
S Baral

Horizontal lack of residual ridge width can complicate the implant procedures. Therefore, ridge construction prior to implant placement is a biomechanical requirement. Guided bone regeneration, bone grafting, alveolar ridge splitting and combinations of these techniques are used for the lateral augmentation of the alveolar ridge. The ridge splitting technique with simultaneous implant placement seems to be a minimally invasive treatment option for horizontal augmentation of narrow alveolar ridges with adequate vertical height. This paper thoroughly describes a segmental ridge splitting technique with both vertical and horizontal osteotomy cuts followed by the use of chisel and mallet to lateralise the buccal bone which was accompanied by GBR and simultaneous implant placement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Jain ◽  
Abir Sarkar ◽  
Pramod K Chahar ◽  
Vishvnathe Udayshankar

Treatment of edentulous maxillary anterior region with horizontal ridge atrophy presents a clinical situation in which the placement of endosseous implants might be complex or sometimes impossible without a ridge augmentation procedure. This case report presents management of horizontally deficient maxillary anterior ridge with ridge split procedure using piezotome and simultaneous implant placement. In contrast to other ridge augmentation techniques, ridge splitting allows for immediate implant placement following surgery reducing the overall treatment time and eradicates the possible morbidity from a second surgical site.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 196-202
Author(s):  
Phuc Ngo Vinh ◽  
Tai Tran Tan ◽  
Duong Huynh Van

Background: The concept of immediate implant loading has recently become popular due to less trauma, reduction in overall treatment time, decrease in hard and soft tissue resorption, increase in patient’s acceptance, along with better function, aesthetics and has a psychological satisfaction to the patient. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of implant placement immediately after tooth extraction. Materials and method: The study consisted of 32 patients with 43 implants have been placed immediately after tooth extraction in the Odonto-Maxillo-Facial Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City. Evaluation results after dental implants 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months. Results: Good clinical results after 1 week was 55.8%, after 3 months and 6 months were 100%. After 1 week of implant placement, good healing took 59.4%. After 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, 100% of the patients are well healed. After 3 months, 6 months without any implant has the status of shaky. Most dental implants have good levels of bone graft. The level of good after 3 months of implants was 72.1% and after 6 months all cases are good. The success rate for dental implants was up to 97.7%, failing only 2.3%. After 3 months the implants had a good level of 72.1% and after 6 months, all cases were good. Patients with success in implant placement accounted for a high rate of 97.7%, failure only accounted for 2.3%. Conclusions: Success rate in immediate implant is high. It is necessary to develop this method to restore lost teeth to achieve optimum results. Key words: Dental implant, immediate implant after tooth extraction


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksa Marković ◽  
T. Mišić

Summary Implant placement in the esthetic zone is a complex procedure and requires a restoration-driven approach. Proper selection of patients and implant together with individual assessment of the risk of esthetic complications are very important. Correct 3D-implant positioning and sufficient bone volume should provide long-term esthetic and function. Esthetic region is a zone in which expectations and possibilities collide. Clinician should bring the important decision on the appropriate time of implant placement. Immediate implant placement is particularly challenging in the esthetic zone. Patient desire for reduced treatment time should be weighed against the possible risk factors. Protocol of immediate implant placement in conditions of unfavourable gingival biotypes, the lack of bone or soft tissue in patients with a high smile line lead to esthetic failure which is very important in the esthetic region.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Kuchler ◽  
Vivianne Chappuis ◽  
Reinhard Gruber ◽  
Niklaus P. Lang ◽  
Giovanni E. Salvi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document