EVALUATION OF RESULTS OF THE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER TOOTH EXTRACTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 196-202
Author(s):  
Phuc Ngo Vinh ◽  
Tai Tran Tan ◽  
Duong Huynh Van
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
The Status ◽  
Immediate Implant

Background: The concept of immediate implant loading has recently become popular due to less trauma, reduction in overall treatment time, decrease in hard and soft tissue resorption, increase in patient’s acceptance, along with better function, aesthetics and has a psychological satisfaction to the patient. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of implant placement immediately after tooth extraction. Materials and method: The study consisted of 32 patients with 43 implants have been placed immediately after tooth extraction in the Odonto-Maxillo-Facial Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City. Evaluation results after dental implants 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months. Results: Good clinical results after 1 week was 55.8%, after 3 months and 6 months were 100%. After 1 week of implant placement, good healing took 59.4%. After 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, 100% of the patients are well healed. After 3 months, 6 months without any implant has the status of shaky. Most dental implants have good levels of bone graft. The level of good after 3 months of implants was 72.1% and after 6 months all cases are good. The success rate for dental implants was up to 97.7%, failing only 2.3%. After 3 months the implants had a good level of 72.1% and after 6 months, all cases were good. Patients with success in implant placement accounted for a high rate of 97.7%, failure only accounted for 2.3%. Conclusions: Success rate in immediate implant is high. It is necessary to develop this method to restore lost teeth to achieve optimum results. Key words: Dental implant, immediate implant after tooth extraction

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Report of Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.

scholarly journals Ridge Splitting Technique for Horizontal Augmentation and Immediate Implant Placement

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Ioannis Papathanasiou ◽  
Georgios Vasilakos ◽  
Sotirios Baltiras ◽  
Lampros Zouloumis
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Classical Approach ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Splitting Technique ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Horizontal Augmentation ◽  
Immediate Implant

Abstract Insufficient width of the alveolar ridge often prevents ideal implant placement. Guided bone regeneration, bone grafting, alveolar ridge splitting and combinations of these techniques are used for the lateral augmentation of the alveolar ridge. Ridge splitting is a minimally invasive technique indicated for alveolar ridges with adequate height, which enables immediate implant placement and eliminates morbidity and overall treatment time. The classical approach of the technique involves splitting the alveolar ridge into 2 parts with use of ostetomes and chisels. Modifications of this technique include the use of rotating instrument, screw spreaders, horizontal spreaders and ultrasonic device. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly describe all the different approaches in ridge splitting technique. 2 interesting clinical cases of narrow alveolar ridges treated with ridge splitting and immediate implant placement are also presented.

Horizontal maxillary ridge augmentation with ridge split procedure and simultaneous implant placement: A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Jain ◽  
Abir Sarkar ◽  
Pramod K Chahar ◽  
Vishvnathe Udayshankar
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Endosseous Implants ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Ridge Split

Treatment of edentulous maxillary anterior region with horizontal ridge atrophy presents a clinical situation in which the placement of endosseous implants might be complex or sometimes impossible without a ridge augmentation procedure. This case report presents management of horizontally deficient maxillary anterior ridge with ridge split procedure using piezotome and simultaneous implant placement. In contrast to other ridge augmentation techniques, ridge splitting allows for immediate implant placement following surgery reducing the overall treatment time and eradicates the possible morbidity from a second surgical site.

Three-Year Analysis of Tapered Screw-Vent Implants Placed into Extraction Sockets Grafted With Mineralized Bone Allograft

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Minichetti ◽  
Joseph C. D'Amore ◽  
Anna Y. J. Hong
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Bone Volume ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Healing Period ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

Abstract With clinicians placing more dental implants, it is becoming increasingly important to maintain bone volume after tooth extraction. This article reports the results of implants placed into extraction sites grafted with particulate mineralized bone allograft (Puros). A total of 313 extraction sites were grafted with mineralized bone graft during a 36-month period. A total of 252 Tapered Screw-Vent dental implants were placed into the grafted extraction sites after a 4- to 7-month healing period. All reentries revealed a bony hard structure acceptable for osteotomy preparation. A total of 244 of these implants have been restored with fixed prosthesis and 6 with removable overdentures for a total of 250 loaded implants. A total of 6 implants failed, which required their removal (2 implants before load and 4 after loading), resulting in a 97.6% implant success rate. We conclude that mineralized human allograft placed into extraction sites is clinically useful to maintain bone volume. This material provided a bony hard structure acceptable for implant placement with good success rates.

scholarly journals Single Sitting Surgical Treatment of Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis Using GTR Technique and Immediate Implant Placement with 10-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Fatme Mouchref Hamasni ◽  
Fady El Hajj ◽  
Rima Abdallah
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Aggressive Periodontitis ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Periodontal Tissues ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Maintenance Program ◽  
The Status ◽  
Immediate Implant

This case report exhibits a patient with generalized aggressive periodontitis who has been under maintenance for the past 12 years after being surgically treated in a single sitting and restored with dental implants. A 41-year-old systemically healthy male patient presented complaining of lower anterior teeth mobility and pain in the upper right quadrant. After clinical and radiographic examination, the upper right molars and lower anterior incisors were deemed unrestorable. Covered by doxycycline, the patient received a nonsurgical periodontal treatment. Three weeks later, teeth extraction, immediate implant placement, immediate nonloading provisional prosthesis, and a guided tissue regeneration were performed at indicated areas in a single sitting. The clinical decisions were based on patient compliance, the status of the existing periodontal tissues, and the prognosis of the remaining teeth. During the 12-year follow-up period, no residual pockets were observed and there was no exacerbation of the inflammatory condition. Marginal bone stability is present on all implants. For aggressive periodontal disease, a high risk of relapse as well as limited success and survival of dental implants should be considered. This case shows proper containment of the disease based on appropriate treatment planning and a strict maintenance program.

scholarly journals An immediate implant placement technique to rehabilitate multi-rooted teeth by pre-extraction interradicular implant bed preparation using remaining roots as a guide: A case presentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Ronauk Singh ◽  
H S Sandhu ◽  
Saumyendra V. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Psychological Benefits ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Osseointegrated Implants ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Implant Bed

The introduction of osseointegrated implants have revolutionized the art and science of modern dentistry giving a new lease of life to the restorative aspects in day-to-day practice. Immediate loading (IL) of dental implants can significantly decrease treatment time and thus increase patient acceptance. IL of dental implants has recently gained popularity due to several factors including reduced trauma as well as aesthetic and psychological benefits to the patient. The present case report describes the immediate replacement of partially edentulous maxilla using Nobel Active™ implant. It describes about the diagnosis, treatment planning and procedures involving the placement of single tooth immediate implant followed by uneventful healing.

Immediate Placement of Dental Implants Into Fresh Extraction Socket in the Maxillary Anterior Region: A Case Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Beom Park
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Hard Tissue ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Palatal Implant ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Challenging Situation

Abstract The loss of the buccal alveolar plate following tooth extraction in the maxillary anterior may lead to palatal implant positioning with esthetic complications. Immediate placement of dental implants has been suggested because it may preclude dramatic postextraction bone loss. In this report, the harmony of soft and hard tissue was achieved by immediate implant placement with bone augmentation in an esthetically challenging situation.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement in Infected Sockets: A Consecutive Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kakar ◽  
Kanupriya Kakar ◽  
Minas D. Leventis ◽  
Gaurav Jain
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Surface ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

Introduction: Immediate placement of implants in a fresh post-extraction socket is an increasingly popular and established treatment option. However, active infection in the extraction site may adversely affect the outcome of this procedure. This study was designed to assess the clinical results of immediate placement of dental implants in infected extraction sockets using a standardized protocol, which included (a) the use of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser for the decontamination of the infected socket prior to implant insertion, and (b) the utilization of an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft substitute to augment the gap between the implant surface and the labial plate of bone. Patients and Methods: A retrospective record review was used to identify 68 patients who had implants placed as per the described protocol. A total of 126 implants were placed in 68 patients (65 implants in the maxilla, 61 implants in the mandible). The implants were loaded 136 ± 73 days (mean ± standard deviation; range: 37–400 days) after implant placement. Eight patients (16 implants) were subsequently lost to follow up. Results: 105 of the 110 implants (95.45%) placed immediately in the infected sites using the described protocol survived after prosthetic loading. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement in previously infected sites using the protocols mentioned in our study with laser decontamination of the socket, grafting with an in situ hardening alloplastic bone graft material and non-submerged healing shows a similar survival rate to the published success rates for immediate implants placed in non-infected sites.

Altered Fractionation in Radiotherapy

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Valdagni
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Conventional Fractionation ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Normal Tissue Damage ◽  
Altered Fractionation ◽  
Cell Repopulation

Differences between late-responding (slowly proliferating) normal tissues and early-responding (rapidly proliferating) normal tissues and tumor cells and the event of tumor cell repopulation occurring during treatment have essentially led to the development of altered fractionation schemes. Altered fractionation regimens mainly refer to schedules utilising two or more (small dose) fractions per day for part of or for the entire treatment course. It must be underlined that a true standard or conventional fractionation regimen does not exist: no schedule is universally recognised as the standard of reference to be compared with. However, continental European and U.S. conventional regimens are the considered control arm with which the new experimental regimens have to be compared. For this reason they are generally recognised as the standards. The basic rationale for hyperfractionated or accelerated regimens respectively lies in the possibility (a) to deliver higher total doses reducing late-responding normal tissue damage, (b) to deliver total doses in a reduced overall treatment time to defeat tumor clonogen repopulation. Multiple fractions per day should not be delivered with interfraction intervals smaller than 6 hours. Clinical results of phase I-II and limited but convincing phase III randomised trials suggest that a therapeutic benefit can be achieved with new altered regimens.

scholarly journals Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone-Surgical Considerations

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksa Marković ◽  
T. Mišić
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Individual Assessment ◽  
Complex Procedure ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
And Function ◽  
Selection Of

Summary Implant placement in the esthetic zone is a complex procedure and requires a restoration-driven approach. Proper selection of patients and implant together with individual assessment of the risk of esthetic complications are very important. Correct 3D-implant positioning and sufficient bone volume should provide long-term esthetic and function. Esthetic region is a zone in which expectations and possibilities collide. Clinician should bring the important decision on the appropriate time of implant placement. Immediate implant placement is particularly challenging in the esthetic zone. Patient desire for reduced treatment time should be weighed against the possible risk factors. Protocol of immediate implant placement in conditions of unfavourable gingival biotypes, the lack of bone or soft tissue in patients with a high smile line lead to esthetic failure which is very important in the esthetic region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document