Die Entwicklung des „Steuerstaates“: Ursprung, Aufstieg und Ende eines finanzwirtschaftlichen Fortschrittsparadigmas

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-552
Author(s):  
Alexander Leipold ◽  
Sebastian Huhnholz
Keyword(s):  
Public Finance ◽  
Great Recession ◽  
The Great Recession ◽  
Democratic Capitalism ◽  
Fiscal Sociology ◽  
Tax State ◽  
Economic Control ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Central Paradigm ◽  
Advanced Capitalist

Abstract For decades, the Schumpeterian tax state was considered the central paradigm of Fiscal Sociology. However, it increasingly fails to meet many of the conceptual challenges of contemporary public finance. To demonstrate this, the paper undertakes a double re-contextualization of the discourse on public finance. Its development is traced back to evolutionary thinking, which Joseph Schumpeter updated around 1918. However, and following the rise of democratic capitalism after 1945, thinking about the tax state became intertwined with economic control. Its socio-political specifics were marginalized. Since the Great Recession of 2008/2009 and widening fiscal crises in advanced capitalist economies, this discursive narrowing has again become the subject of political and economic controversies.

Limits of Property Taxes and Charges: City Revenue Structures After the Great Recession

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunji Kim
Keyword(s):  
Public Finance ◽  
Great Recession ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Property Tax ◽  
Property Taxes ◽  
Historical Trends ◽  
Stable Property ◽  
The Great Recession ◽  
Expenditure Limitations ◽  
Urban Places

Public finance theories argue local governments should primarily use broad-based and stable property taxes. However, the housing bust after the Great Recession challenges this argument, and historical trends show cities have heavily relied on charges since the late 1970s. Using 2012 Census of Governments data for 2,396 cities, this article explores which cities rely more on charges and the links between property tax dependence and city stress. Regression results show property tax dependence is linked to capacity, while charges dependence is linked to stress. Charges can be a useful revenue tool for cities under stress, but they may be regressive and their use may be limited to urban places with services that can be charged for and cities with growth pressures and less stringent tax and expenditure limitations. Absent equalization efforts from higher-level governments, barriers to using charges, which cities have little control over, may increase inequality among cities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document