An Integrated Methodology for the Emergency Logistics Centers Location Selection Problem and its Application for the Turkey Case

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umut Rifat Tuzkaya ◽  
Kadriye Busra Yilmazer ◽  
Gulfem Tuzkaya
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Weight Changes ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Integrated Methodology ◽  
Emergency Logistics ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Selection Methodology

AbstractUrgent response is vitally important after unpredictable disasters and it is highly dependent to the location of the emergency centers. Considering this importance degree, in this study, a location selection methodology for emergency logistics centers (ELCs) is proposed. There are various influencing factors or criteria to choose the most convenient locations for ELCs. However, we focused on some of the most important and prior criteria to obtain a more feasible approach and less calculation intensity. The main point is ranking and weighting the convenient locations or cities for constructing an ELC in a region or country. The alternative locations are chosen through the mostly natural disaster-prone cities. Decision criteria are determined according to the expert opinions. Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods are integrated to determine the convenient locations considering the relations between criteria and alternative locations. Afterwards, a real life application of the proposed methodology is realized for the Turkey case. Finally, results are examined and analyzed in terms of their sensitivity on the criteria weight changes.

scholarly journals An Integrated Decision-Making Method Based on Neutrosophic Numbers for Investigating Factors of Coastal Erosion

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azzah Awang ◽  
Nur Aizam ◽  
Lazim Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Coastal Erosion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Coastal Development ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Life Problems ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Integrated Decision Making

The recent boom of various integrated decision-making methods has attracted many researchers to the field. The recent integrated Analytic Network Process and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (ANP–DEMATEL) methods were developed based on crisp numbers and fuzzy numbers. However, these numbers are incapable of dealing with the indeterminant and inconsistent information that exists in real-life problems. This paper proposes improvements to the integrated ANP–DEMATEL method by bringing together the neutrosophic numbers, the ANP method, and the DEMATEL method, which are later abbreviated to NS-DANP. The proposed NS-DANP method can handle the indeterminacy elements in the decision-making environment, as the single-valued neutrosophic numbers are used in the decision analysis. This proposed NS-DANP modification method includes linguistic variables representing the single-valued neutrosophic numbers (SVNNs), and also introduces the single-valued neutrosophic weighted averaging (SVNWA) aggregation operator to aggregate the decision makers’ judgments instead of the typical averaging method. The applicability of the proposed method is illustrated by a case study of the coastal erosion problem along the Peninsular Malaysia coastline, where 12 factors were considered. Three experts of coastal erosion from different organizations were invited to elicit their linguistic judgments on the cause–effect of the coastal erosion. The seven-step decision approach was developed to acquire the weightage of each coastal erosion factor. The outcome of this study reveals that coastal development is the riskiest factor toward coastal erosion. The weight of factors and the cause–effect diagram could be very helpful for government and stakeholders to project a better mitigation plan for the coastal erosion problem. Comparative analysis is also provided to check the feasibility of the proposed method.

scholarly journals DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SMARTPHONE RECOMMENDATION: THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY ANP IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING

SINERGI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Okfalisa Okfalisa ◽  
Hidayati Rusnedy ◽  
Dwi Utari Iswavigra ◽  
B. Pranggono ◽  
Elin Haerani Haerani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Execution Time ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Random Access ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Application Development ◽  
Fuzzy Anp ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making

Previous researches outlined the advantages of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods in solving Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) problems. The advancement of the above methods was continually developed as an effort to cover up various weaknesses. Mainly related to the consistency and linguistic variables in translating the expert opinions. Thus, it initialized the emergence of Fuzzy AHP (F-AHP) and Fuzzy ANP (F-ANP). Due to the restricted operation of these algorithms in smartphone selection, this research attempted to investigate the effectiveness of both methods in providing the analysis of criteria weight, the final recommendation weight, the product recommendation weight, and the execution time in DSS-SmartPhoneRec application development. A survey of one hundred respondents of University students identified the dominant criteria in selecting the smartphone, namely price, Random Access Memory (RAM), processor, internal memory, and camera. Hence, five alternative products were then chosen as the appropriate smartphones’ recommendations based on the respondent’s preferences.  As an automatic tool, a DSS-SmartPhoneRec application was built to analyze and compare between F-AHP and F-ANP methods in resolving the smartphone selection cases. It revealed that the level of consistency of criteria weight, the final weight of recommendation, and the weight that the product-based F-ANP was 40% greater than F-AHP. In terms of execution time, F-AHP had a shorter time than F-ANP. Meanwhile, the comparison of products recommendation from DSS-SmartPhoneRec and a manual test showed that F-ANP was 16% more in line with the respondents’ predilection. In a nutshell, the DSS-SmartPhoneRec administered the devote smartphone recommendations based on the user’s expectation. The comparison analysis furnished a learning outcome for the users in determining the appropriate MADM method tailored to the type of cases.

scholarly journals A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Selecting the Location of Women’s Fitness Centers

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen-Kuei Liao ◽  
Hsiao-Yin Hsu ◽  
Kuei-Lun Chang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Fitness Centers ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Fuzzy Delphi ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Network Process

Location selection is a critical problem for businesses that can determine the success of an organization. Selecting the optimal location from a pool of alternatives belongs to a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. This study employed a hybrid MCDM technique to select locations for women’s fitness centers in Taiwan. In the beginning, the fuzzy Delphi method was utilized to obtain selection criteria from interviewed senior executives. In the second stage, the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) was employed to extract interdependencies between the selection criteria within each perspective. On the basis of interdependencies between the selection criteria, the analytic network process (ANP) was used to get respective weights of each criterion. Finally, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was ranking the alternatives. To demonstrate application of the proposed model and illustrate a location selection problem, a case was conducted. The capabilities and effectiveness of the proposed model are revealed.

scholarly journals NAVIGATING SWOT-FANP WITH GSM METHOD TO PRIORITIZE THE STRATEGIC LOCATION

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Huei LEE
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Process Analysis ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Second Tier ◽  
Focus Strategy

This paper proposes a SWOT-FANP (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats – fuzzy analytic network process) analysis, together with the grand strategy matrix method (GSM) to deal with the multiple-criteria decision-making problem of location selection for a second tier city in China. This hybrid method can not only combine both qualitative and quantitative information and utilize fuzzy logic to eliminate vagueness, subjectivity, and imprecision, it can also clearly represents the competitive position of second-tier cities on a the quadrant coordinate to help an enterprise choose a strategy for development. To this end, I empirically chose a multinational pharmaceutical enterprise (MNE) as an illustrative example. The results reveal that Suzhou and Chongqing cities are in the best positions in the competition as a result of having external opportunities for development and internal competing strength. Moreover, the MNE could adopt a niche-focus strategy for the market by focusing on specific ailments to which people in Chinese communities are vulnerable to strengthen their competitive strengths. This study demonstrates and validates that such an enhanced methodology is viable and highly capable of providing enriched insights regarding strategic decision-making management in complex real-world situations.

scholarly journals Location Selection of a Manufacturing Facility from the Perspective of Supply Chain Sustainability

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1418
Author(s):  
Sun-Weng Huang ◽  
James J.H. Liou ◽  
William Tang ◽  
Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Location Selection ◽  
Subjective Weight ◽  
Network Process ◽  
The Right

When threatened with catastrophic political or economic fluctuations, a firm might be forced to consider relocating their supply chain to reduce the risk. Such a relocation necessitates a series of changes, so making the right decision is crucial for sustainable development of the company. In the past, various models have been developed to help managers to select the optimal location. However, most of these considered the factors independently but in the real world, these factors have a mutually influential relationship. This study purposes a hybrid multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) model to provide decision makers with a comprehensive framework to evaluate the best strategies to solve relocation problems, which also considers the interdependency between criteria. The model incorporates the DANP (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-based Analytic Network Process) model (subjective weight) and entropy method (objective weight) to determine the weights of the criteria. Then, the modified VIKOR (VIšekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje) method is applied to select the optimal alternative for relocation. The usefulness of the model is demonstrated by taking an electronics manufacturing company with a global supply chain as an example. The results indicate that the proposed hybrid model can assist companies in choosing the best locations for their supply chains for sustained development.

scholarly journals The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Safety Management System Evaluation Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 12006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Rolita ◽  
Bayu Surarso ◽  
Rahmat Gernowo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Management System ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Performance Criterion ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Safety Management System ◽  
International Airport ◽  
Network Process

In order to improve airport safety management system (SMS) performance, an evaluation system is required to improve on current shortcomings and maximize safety. This study suggests the integration of the DEMATEL and ANP methods in decision making processes by analyzing causal relations between the relevant criteria and taking effective analysis-based decision. The DEMATEL method builds on the ANP method in identifying the interdependencies between criteria. The input data consists of questionnaire data obtained online and then stored in an online database. Furthermore, the questionnaire data is processed using DEMATEL and ANP methods to obtain the results of determining the relationship between criteria and criteria that need to be evaluated. The study cases on this evaluation system were Adi Sutjipto International Airport, Yogyakarta (JOG); Ahmad Yani International Airport, Semarang (SRG); and Adi Sumarmo International Airport, Surakarta (SOC). The integration grades SMS performance criterion weights in a descending order as follow: safety and destination policy, safety risk management, healthcare, and safety awareness. Sturges' formula classified the results into nine grades. JOG and SMG airports were in grade 8, while SOG airport was in grade 7.

scholarly journals Applying ANP in Establishing a Decision-Making Model for the Destination Selection of Large-scale Exhibitions

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Wen-Tsung Wu ◽  
Chie-Bein Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Second Tier ◽  
High Benefit ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Selection Of

This study investigates the decision-making issues in the selection of destinations for large-scale exhibitions by the cultural and creative industry. We use the Rubber Duck China Tour by the Dutch artist Florentijn Hofman as an example and adopt the analytic network process technique to evaluate destination options for the exhibition, as well as to explore the impacts of the evaluation of destination feasibilities on exhibition investment. The results show that power, a high benefit-cost ratio, first-tier cities, integration with local communities, and a rich and interesting theme are the top five factors that curators should consider when planning exhibitions. Considering the priority among cities of various tiers, first-tier cities are the most favorable, followed by fourth-tier, third-tier, and second-tier cities. The decision-making model provides curators with a reliable reference for selecting destinations for future exhibitions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document