Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A. Chervenak ◽  
Laurence B. McCullough ◽  
Joachim Dudenhausen
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
Ultrasound Testing

AbstractThere is a problem with the current nomenclature of prenatal evaluation. The current nomenclature of “prenatal testing” and “prenatal screening” – along with their subsets of “ultrasound testing,” “ultrasound screening,” “non-invasive prenatal testing,” “non-invasive prenatal screening,” and “prenatal diagnosis” – has become so imprecise that clinical misinterpretation and distortion of the informed consent process are increasingly difficult to avoid. To remedy this problem, we propose a new, precise nomenclature: “fetal analysis with invasive method” (FA-I) and “fetal analysis with non-invasive method,” (FANI) using various techniques. This new nomenclature is designed to be precise and therefore facilitate effective communication among physicians and with pregnant women. For ease of use the new nomenclature can be formulated as an abbreviation: FA-I and FA-NI.

scholarly journals Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)

Bioethics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 671-678
Author(s):  
Adriana Kater‐Kuipers ◽  
Inez D. Beaufort ◽  
Robert‐Jan H. Galjaard ◽  
Eline M. Bunnik
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Ethical Analysis ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Prenatal diagnosis of 2193 pregnant women with invasive indications for chromosomal abnormalities in southern China: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Gu ◽  
Sudong Liu ◽  
Huaxian Wang ◽  
Ruiqiang Weng ◽  
Xuemin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Genetic Screening ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Non Invasive

Abstract Background: Although a variety of non-invasive techniques are used for prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis, our knowledge remains limited regarding the relationship between high-risk prenatal indications and fetal chromosomal abnormalities.Methods: We retrospectively investigated the prenatal genetic screening and karyotype analysis results of pregnant women who had undergone invasive prenatal testing in Prenatal Diagnosis Department of Meizhou People’s Hospital during Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2019. We analyzed the frequencies of chromosome abnormalities in women with high-risk indications.Results: A total of 2,193 pregnant women who had underwent invasive prenatal testing were included in our analysis. Chromosomal abnormalities occurred in 10.3% of these women, and rate increased with maternal age (P < 0.001). The frequencies of chromosome abnormalities varied for women with different high-risk indications, which was 10.3% (226/2193) for abnormal ultrasound results, 3.3% (31/938) for positive serum screening test results, 61.4% (78/127) for positive NIPT results, 9.3% (13/140) for AMA and 11.1% (10/90) for obstetric/family history. Follow up data showed that 380 pregnant women opted for termination the pregnancy, including 211 (55.5%) due to karyotype abnormalities and 169 (45.5%) due to abnormal ultrasonic outcomes.Conclusion: Our data suggested that the prenatal screening methods have high false positive rates. NIPT is the most accurate non-invasive prenatal screening. Apart from karyotype abnormality, abnormal ultrasound results alone accounted for a big part of pregnancy termination.

Prenatal screening and non-invasive prenatal testing regulation in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
A.S. Olenev ◽  
◽  
E.E. Baranova ◽  
O.V. Sagaydak ◽  
A.M. Galaktionova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Chromosomal Anomalies ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Dna ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
The Russian Federation

Congenital malformations, chromosomal and monogenic disease play a significant role in perinatal mortality and child disability. According to the early prenatal screening results in the Russian Federation in 2018, the overall ratio of chromosomal anomaly prevalence is 1:250–1:300. Currently aneuploidy risk is calculated by using indirect biochemical and ultrasound markers, that have low sensitivity and specificity which can cause false positives and false negative results leading to unreasonable invasive procedures or missing chromosomal anomalies. It is well known that cell-free fetal DNA is detected in maternal blood. Whole‐genome sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidy with high sensitivity as early as 10 weeks into pregnancy. The accuracy of determining fetal sex is also high: sensitivity and specificity are 98,9% and 99,9% respectively. Implementing molecular technology into clinical practice is required to improve prenatal diagnosis in the Russian Federation, icluding Moscow. Integration of NIPT to analyse cell-free fetal DNA will increase the efficiency of fetal chromosomal anomalies’ detection. However, there are some legal and ethical aspects to consider when integrating a new technology for wide-spread use. This review reveals arguable issues of NIPT integration into widespread clinical practice and possible ways of solving those issues. Key words: NIPT, noninvasive prenatal test, prenatal screening, fetal sex, invasive prenatal diagnosis, X-linked disease, chromosomal anomaly, chromosomal microarray analysis

International experience in organizing non-invasive prenatal testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137
Author(s):  
A.S. Olenev ◽  
◽  
E.E. Baranova ◽  
O.V. Sagaydak ◽  
A.M. Galaktionova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Pregnant Woman ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
The World ◽  
Chromosomal Aneuploidies

Non-invasive prenatal testinging (NIPT) is a relatively new method aimed at detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by analyzing extracellular fetoplacental DNA in the blood of a pregnant woman. NIPT has high sensitivity and specificity, and many professional communities now recommend its use as a screening method. Since its introduction into clinical practice in Hong Kong in 2011, NIPT has expanded rapidly around the world. The experience of various countries in organizing non-invasive prenatal testing is described in this article. Key words: NIPT, non-invasive prenatal testing, extracellular fetoplacental DNA, prenatal screening, prenatal diagnosis, invasive prenatal diagnosis, aneuploidy

scholarly journals Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Luigi Carbone ◽  
Federica Cariati ◽  
Laura Sarno ◽  
Alessandro Conforti ◽  
Francesca Bagnulo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Dna ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
Common Causes ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Impairment ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidies ◽  
Made In

Fetal aneuploidies are among the most common causes of miscarriages, perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. During the last 70 years, many efforts have been made in order to improve prenatal diagnosis and prenatal screening of these conditions. Recently, the use of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) testing has been increasingly used in different countries, representing an opportunity for non-invasive prenatal screening of pregnant women. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the state of the art and the main strengths and limitations of this test for prenatal screening of fetal aneuploidies.

scholarly journals Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sha Liu ◽  
Hongqian Liu ◽  
Jianlong Liu ◽  
Ting Bai ◽  
Xiaosha Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray ◽  
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis ◽  
Non Invasive

BackgroundOur aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests.ResultsAmong the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses.

scholarly journals Non-invasive prenatal testing: what an obstetrician needs to know

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5200
Author(s):  
Mishu Mangla
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Primary Health Care Providers ◽  
First Choice

No field in obstetrics has seen such fast advancement, as the field of prenatal screening and diagnosis. A wide variety of tests are available today, and this at times becomes confusing both for the patient and the treating doctor that which screening test would be best suited in the given circumstances. Non-invasive prenatal screening, with its numerous advantages is rapidly becoming the test of first choice, especially in the affording set of population.  Although, the test has a very high sensitivity and a very good positive predictive value, this too suffers from some disadvantages which should be clear to the obstetrician ordering the test. A good knowledge about the test, the ideal target population in which this should be offered as the primary screening tool and limitations of the test should be known to all practicing obstetricians and primary health care providers. The current review aims to provide a simplified and updated knowledge regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), its major advantages and disadvantages and summarizes the role of ultrasound in patients with negative NIPT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document