scholarly journals The Association Between Obesity and Visit-to-visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure: A Prospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (s1) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
Sanja Stojanovic ◽  
Marina Deljanin Ilic ◽  
Stevan Ilic ◽  
Nebojša Tasic ◽  
Bojan Ilic ◽  
...  

Abstract With the prevalence of obesity and all accompanying health risks, both prevention and health education, as well as identifying predictors for the development of obesity-related diseases are primary. Th e pathophysiological relationship between obesity and visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure (SBPV) has not been completely resolved. To investigate the association between obesity and SBPV in hypertensive patients. Th e prospective study comprised three visits was performed at the hypertension outpatient clinic during the follow up period of 22-months between March 2014 and January 2016. Th is study included 300 randomly selected hypertensive patients (average 67.76±9.84 years), who were divided in groups of obese/non-obese examinees. SBPV was defined as the standard deviation (SD) from three values of SBP. Th e values of SBP and SBP-SD were significantly higher in the group of obese hypertensive patients than in the group of non-obese patients (126.67±8.22 vs 120.45±7.79 mmHg, 11.00±5.64 vs 7.34±3.96; p<0.01). Th e highest SBPV was recorded in the 4th quartile in obese patients (43.13±7.50 mmHg). Th ere was statistically stronger correlation between SBPV and BMI/Waist cirumferences (WC) (ρο=0.425/ ρο=0.356, p<0.01). During 22-months follow up there was a significant decrease of SBPV for 8.2 mmHg, BP for 31/8 mmHg, BMI for 3.8 kg/m2, WC for 10 cm and body weight for 8.24 kg. During 22-months follow-up, reduction of body weight was associated with reduction of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Persistently decrease both body weight and long term visit-to-visit variability may explain lower cardiovascular risk in obese-related disease.

Author(s):  
Hui Chen ◽  
Tianjing Zhou ◽  
Jie Guo ◽  
John S Ji ◽  
Liyan Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Body weight variability (BWV) refers to intraindividual weight loss and gain over a period. The association of long-term BWV with dementia remains unclear and whether this association is beyond body weight change is undetermined. Methods In the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a total of 5,547 dementia-free participants (56.7% women; mean [SD] age, 71.1 [3.2] years) at baseline (2008) were followed up to 8 years (mean=6.8 years) to detect incident dementia. Body weight was self-reported biennially from 1992-2008. BWV was measured as the coefficient of variation utilizing the body weight reported 9 times across 16 years before baseline. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Among the 5,547 participants, a total of 427 incident dementia cases were identified during follow-up. Greater long-term BWV was significantly associated with a higher risk of dementia (HR comparing extreme quartiles: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.48-2.72; HR of each SD increment: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10-1.32; P-trend&lt;0.001) independent of mean body weight and body weight change. This significant association was even observed for BWV estimated approximately 15 years preceding dementia diagnosis (HR of each SD increment: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23) and was more pronounced for that closer to diagnosis. Conclusions Our prospective study suggested that greater BWV may be a novel risk factor for dementia.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lital Yinon ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Faruque Parvez ◽  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Tariqul Islam ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Quazi Tarikul Islam ◽  
Md Azizul Haque ◽  
ASM Shawkat Ali ◽  
ARM Saifuddin Ekram ◽  
Sultana Monira Hussain ◽  
...  

1068 randomly sampled adult Bangladeshi people were studied during a period of six months from October 2004 to March 2005. It was a randomized, prospective study. Cases that fulfilled two criteria of metabolic syndrome (MetS) were evaluated to see pattern and types of MetS. Out of 1068 patients, 110 (10.3%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 101 (9.4%) cases were labeled as metabolic syndrome according to NCEP ATP III criteria, 09 cases had only two criteria. 40 cases were male & 70 cases were female (M:F= 1:1.8). Mean age of patients with was 44.88, ranging from the age of 20-68 years. Majority (55%) of the patients were in the age group of 30-49 years. Half of the cases had BMI 30-34.9. Mean body weight of male was 85.9 kg and of female was 78.2 kg. Mean waist circumference of male was 41.7 inches and of female 40 inches. Mean HDL for male was 38.3 mg/dL and for female is 40.2 mg/dL. Mean Triglyceride for male was 172.1 and for female was 169.3 mg/dL. Mean total cholesterol for male was 216.7 and for female was 207.6 mg/dL. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) for men is 162 mm Hg & diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 99 mm Hg and for female mean SBP 155 and DBP 96 mm Hg. Metabolic syndrome is more prevalent in the 3rd and 4th decade of life in both sexes. It is almost twice common in female than male. Combination of hypertension, obesity & dyslipidemia comprises nearly 40% of its presentation.    doi: 10.3329/jom.v10i2.2813 J MEDICINE 2009; 10 : 48-51


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H H Kuo ◽  
M E Liu ◽  
P L Lin ◽  
L.Y.-M Liu

Abstract Introduction Lorcaserin is a selective serotonin 2c receptor agonist approved as an anti-obesity agent. The additional cardiometabolic benefits associated with lorcaserin have not been conclusively established. Purpose To examine the effects of lorcaserin on blood pressure, heart rate and other metabolic parameters in overweight or obese patients from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central using search terms: “lorcaserin”, “Belviq”, and “randomized controlled trials” without language restrictions. RCTs with a follow-up period of at least 24 weeks were included for the meta-analysis. Results Five studies with 9349 patients in the lorcaserin group and 9370 patients in the placebo group were included. Compared with placebo, lorcaserin not only reduced weight (mean difference [MD] = −3.03 kg, 95% CI: −3.42, −2.63, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2 =68%), waist circumference (MD=−2.27 cm, 95% CI: −2.71, −1.83, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=57%) and BMI (MD=−1.11 kg/m2, 95% CI: −1.27, −0.96, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=68%), but also improved SBP (MD=−0.75 mmHg, 95% CI: −1.12, −0.38, P<0.0001, I2=0%), DBP (MD=−0.70 mmHg, 95% CI: −0.93, −0.48, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=0%), heart rate (MD=−0.94 bpm, 95% CI: −1.28, −0.60, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=0%), LDL (MD=−1.47 mg/dL, 95% CI: −2.21, −0.74, P<0.0001, I2=0%), HDL (MD=0.55 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.08, 1.01, P=0.02, I2=18%), triglycerides (MD=−8.71 mg/dL, 95% CI: −12.14, −5.28, P<0.ehz745.08171, I2=71%), and fasting plasma glucose (MD=−5.69 mg/L, 95% CI: −9.5, −1.87, P=0.003, I2=93%). Our findings support that lorcaserin has consistent and favourable effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and all criteria of metabolic syndrome. Summary of lorcaserin effects Conclusion Lorcaserin improved all cardiometabolic parameters modestly in addition to its weight loss effect in overweight or obese patients. More research is needed to determine its long-term cardiovascular benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document