Variation in hormone receptor and HER-2 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: review of the literature

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cagatay Arslan ◽  
Ebru Sari ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Kadri Altundag
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18094-e18094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizan Malik ◽  
Naveed Ali ◽  
Syed Imran Mustafa Jafri ◽  
Mark L. Sundermeyer ◽  
Michael Jeffrey Seidman ◽  
...  

e18094 Background: Palbociclib has been approved as a first line therapy in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) and HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC) manifesting significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS). We studied this drug in a community setting. The endpoints were estimated PFS, objective response, toxicities and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of HR+MBC patients receiving palbociclib after its FDA approval. 22 patients were selected Results: A total of 22 patients were included (Male = 2, Female = 20). Median age was 60-years (range, 49-84). About 90% patients had received at least one previous therapy and the median number was 1.5. 13% patients were on fulvestrant, 86% on letrozole and 4.5% on exemestane. About 64% of patients had ECOG status of ≥ 1. Median duration of palbociclib treatment was 5-months, therefore, an estimated PFS at 18-months was 50%. 4.5% patients attained complete response. 22% patients achieved partial response, 22% had stable disease and 50% patients demonstrated disease progression. 72% patients had neutropenia, of which 45% were grade ≥ 3. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were common (63% and 58%, respectively) but grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia or anemia was not observed. 50% patients required dose reductions and 18% required drug cessation owing to side effects. Conclusions: PFS was much lower as compared to actual trials in our real-world experience. Despite, several interesting observations were good objective response rates in males and HER-2+ patients underscoring its potential clinical efficacy in these subsets. Furthermore, apart from myelosuppressive side effects, pneumonitis was observed in one patient necessitating vigilance in clinical practice


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-107
Author(s):  
Burak Bilgin ◽  
Mehmet AN Şendur ◽  
Mutlu Hızal ◽  
Muhammed Bülent Akıncı ◽  
Didem Şener Dede ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee S. Schwartzberg ◽  
Sandra X. Franco ◽  
Allison Florance ◽  
Lisa O'Rourke ◽  
Julie Maltzman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Lee S. Schwarzberg ◽  
Sandra X. Franco ◽  
Allison Florance ◽  
Lisa O'Rourke ◽  
Julie Maltzman ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaston Demonty

The aim of this review is to examine the evidence available supporting the use of the docetaxel plus trastuzumab combination for patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The results of trials involving this combination are summarized, with an emphasis on efficacy and cardiotoxicity data. Finally, this article attempts to identify areas of uncertainty where new trials are warranted to improve our knowledge regarding optimal care for patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-158
Author(s):  
Thanate Dajsakdipon ◽  
Jitprapa Konmun ◽  
Umaporn Udomsubpayakul ◽  
Thitiya Dejthevaporn

Background: Everolimus/exemestane has been shown to improve progression-free survival in patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer. The regimen has been well-accepted despite lack of survival benefit. In real-life setting, patients were not well-selected and hence benefit of such treatment may not be as robust. Method: This is a retrospective review of 143 hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER-2 negative MBC patients who progressed on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. Patients who received everolimus/exemestane in any treatment lines (EE group) were compared to patients who never received everolimus (NE group). Primary end point was survival adjusted to prognostic factors. Results: There were 52 patients in EE group and 91 in NE group with mean age of 58.6 years. Median follow-up time was 51 months. Unadjusted median OS was significantly longer in EE [33 vs 25 months, HR 0.66 (95%CI 0.44-0.998); p = 0.049]. In univariate analysis, factors affecting survival included numbers of metastatic sites, bone metastasis, EE treatment and numbers of treatment lines. Independent factors that remained significant in multivariate analysis were treatment lines [HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.63-0.79); p < 0.05] and numbers of metastatic sites. Median numbers of treatment line after NSAI failure was 5.2 vs 3.6 lines in EE and NE, respectively.Conclusion: In this real-life practice data, pts with HR positive, HER-2 negative MBC who had progressed on NSAI, sequential use of multiple treatment regimens of endocrine and chemotherapy is essential to longer survival. Everolimus/exemestane may have contributed, to a lesser extent, to this improvement in survival. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document