Christoph Antons & William Logan (ed.). 2018. Intellectual property, cultural property and intangible cultural heritage. Abingdon: Routledge; 978-1-138-7961-3 £31.99.

Antiquity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (372) ◽  
pp. 1694-1695
Author(s):  
Claire Smith ◽  
Suramya Bansal
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
Terri Janke

Abstract Indigenous knowledge is an integral part of Indigenous cultural heritage. Knowledge about land, seas, places and associated songs, stories, social practices, and oral traditions are important assets for Indigenous communities. Transmitted from generation to generation, Indigenous knowledge is constantly reinterpreted by Indigenous people. Through the existence and transmission of this intangible cultural heritage, Indigenous people are able to associate with a communal identity. The recording and fixing of Indigenous knowledge creates intellectual property (IP), rights of ownership to the material which the written or recorded in documents, sound recordings or films. Intellectual property rights allow the rights owners to control reproductions of the fixed form. IP laws are individual based and economic in nature. A concern for Indigenous people is that the ownership of the intellectual property which is generated from such processes, if often, not owned by them. The IP laws impact on the rights of traditional and Indigenous communities to their cultural heritage. This paper will explore the international developments, case studies, published protocols and policy initiatives concerning the recording, dissemination, digitisation, and commercial use of Indigenous knowledge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Adi Tiaraputri ◽  
Ledy Diana

Pacu jalur merupakan salah satu tradisi dari Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi Provinsi Riau. Pacu jalur juga termasuk dalam ruang lingkup kebudayaan. Untuk ada kelestarian kebudayaan tentunya harus ada perlindungan terhadap kebudyaan tersebut. Tulisan ini mengkali terkat konsep perlindungan yang dapat diberikan pada tradisi pacu jalur. Metode penelitian dalam tulisan ini melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif.  Dalam tulisan ini mengkaji konsep perlindungan untuk pacu jalur dapat melalui perlindungan warisan budaya tak benda dan kekayaan intelektual komunal. Pacu Jalur is one of the traditions of Kuantan Singingi Regency, Riau Province. Pacu jalur is also included in the scope of culture. For there to be preservation of culture, of course, there must be protection of that culture. This paper examines the concept of protection that can be given to the tradition of racing lanes. The research method in this paper is through a normative juridical approach. In this paper, we examine the concept of protection for the runway through the protection of intangible cultural heritage and communal intellectual property.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Lin ◽  
Zheng Lian

With the development of globalization, intangible cultural heritage (ICH) has come under increasing threat, making the safeguarding of ICH a crucial task for the governments and peoples of the world. This paper examines China’s current state of intellectual property (IPR) protection for ICH and proposes that ICH be placed under China’s legislative protection as intellectual property. Due to the immense diversity and complexity of ICH and the difficulty in reconciling various interests involved, the existing IPR protection mode faces many obstacles in practice. We present two case studies and three sets of recommendations on improving the protection of ICH in China. The first set relies on improving copyright protection for ICH, the second set relies on improving trademark and geographical protection for ICH, and the third set relies on improving patent protection for ICH.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-546
Author(s):  
Rosanne Trottier

AbstractEfforts to protect, if not revitalize, intangible cultural heritage in its traditional communities, cannot succeed without due attention to issues of ownership—cultural, environmental, intellectual, economic … “intellectual property” categories in a wisdom system such as that of the Baul of Bengal show that Traditional Knowledge, Customary Law and Traditional Cultural Expressions are inseparable “property,” and that “ownership” should be understood on traditional terms. Within such an integrated continuum, knowledge itself is not limited to it modern meaning.Is it possible to bring about a true and equitable dialogue between radically antagonistic intellectual property universes—the modern one driven by profit, and traditional ones rooted in complex systems of multiple values?The death of a wise old one is the loss of a whole library—L. S. Senghor


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document