Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Active Muscle During High-Intensity and Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
RANDALL E GEARHART ◽  
FREDRIC L. GOSS ◽  
KRISTEN M. LAGALLY ◽  
JOHN M. JAKICIC ◽  
JERE GALLAGHER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Ratings Of Perceived Exertion ◽  
Active Muscle ◽  
Low Intensity

Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Low- and High-Intensity Resistance Exercise by Young Adults

2002 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Lagally ◽  
Kara I. Gallagher ◽  
Robert J. Robertson ◽  
Randall Gearhart ◽  
Fredric L. Goss
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Ratings Of Perceived Exertion ◽  
Active Muscle ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
The One ◽  
Experimental Trials

Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are commonly used to monitor the intensity of aerobic exercise. Whether ratings of perceived exertion can be used similarly during resistance exercise is unclear. To examine this question, perceived exertion was measured at 30% and 90% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM), while holding work constant between intensities. Ratings for the active muscles and for the overall body were examined during both intensities. 10 male (age = 23.2 ± 3.6 yr.) and nine female (age = 21.8 ± 2.7 yr.) volunteers underwent a one-repetition maximum procedure for each of the following exercises; bench press, leg press, latissimus pull down, triceps press, biceps curl, shoulder press, and calf raise. All subjects then completed two experimental trials on separate days. The high-intensity trial consisted of one set of five repetitions at 90% of the one-repetition maximum. The low-intensity trial consisted of one set of 15 repetitions at 30% of the one-repetition maximum. Active muscle and overall body ratings of perceived exertion were obtained immediately at termination of each of the seven exercises at both intensities. A two-factor (RPE x Intensity) repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed separately for each exercise. Both active muscle and overall body ratings of perceived exertion were higher ( p<.01) for the high-intensity trial than for the low intensity trial. Active muscle ratings were higher ( p<.01) than overall body ratings for all exercises. Ratings of perceived exertion during resistance exercise are related to intensity of the resistance exercise (percentage of the one-repetition maximum). This information suggests that ratings of perceived exertion can provide information regarding the intensity of resistance exercise. Furthermore, sensations of exertion in the active muscles during resistance exercise are greater than sensations for the overall body.

Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Active Muscle During High-Intensity and Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
RANDALL F. GEARHART JR. ◽  
FREDRIC L. GOSS ◽  
KRISTEN M. LAGALLY ◽  
JOHN M. JAKICIC ◽  
JERE GALLAGHER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Ratings Of Perceived Exertion ◽  
Active Muscle ◽  
Low Intensity

Relationships Between External- and Internal-Workload Variables in an Elite Female Netball Team and Between Playing Positions

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marni J. Simpson ◽  
David G. Jenkins ◽  
Aaron T. Scanlan ◽  
Vincent G. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Vertical Direction ◽  
Forward Direction ◽  
Ratings Of Perceived Exertion ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Medium Intensity ◽  
Movement Unit

Purpose: To examine relationships between external- and internal-workload variables in an elite female netball team, with consideration of positional differences. Methods: Nine elite female netball athletes had their weekly workloads monitored across their preseason and competition phases of a season. Internal workload was determined using summated heart-rate (HR) zones and session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE), whereas external workload was determined using inertial movement units and included absolute PlayerLoad (PL), relative PL (PL per minute), accelerations (ACCEL), decelerations (DECEL), jumps, changes of direction (COD), high-intensity events, medium-intensity events, low-intensity events, PL in the forward direction, PL in the sideways direction, and PL in the vertical direction. Relationships between external- and internal-workload variables in the team and relative to playing position were examined. Results: Across the team, the strongest external workloads that correlated with summated HR zones were PL (r = .65), COD (r = .64), ACCEL (r = .61), and DECEL (r = .61). The strongest external workloads that correlated with sRPE were COD (r = .79), followed by jumps (r = .76), ACCEL (r = .75), and DECEL (r = .75). For all positions, except-goal shooter, the strongest correlation was between PL and sRPE (r = .88–.94). In the goal-shooter position, the strongest correlation was between summated HR zones and DECEL (r = .89). Conclusions: The inertial movement unit-derived external-workload variables are strongly related to common internal-workload variables. In particular, COD and sRPE appear to provide a good monitoring combination of external and internal training loads for elite netball players.

scholarly journals It’s about Time: Effects of Physical Exertion on Duration Estimates

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Britton W. Brewer ◽  
Lawrence O. Schwartz ◽  
Allen E. Cornelius ◽  
Judy L. Van Raalte ◽  
Edmundo L. Urbina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Physical Exertion ◽  
Fundamental Aspect ◽  
Time Effects ◽  
Task Duration ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
D Values ◽  
And Task

Background: Task duration is a fundamental aspect of exercise, but little is known about how completed bouts of physical activity are perceived. Consequently, the purpose of the five experiments conducted for this investigation was to examine the effects of engaging in physical tasks on retrospective duration estimates with college student participants. Methods: Across the five experiments, participants were 113 college students (82 women, 31 men). In Experiments 1 and 2, participants provided duration estimates of a period spent engaging in physical activity or rest. In Experiments 3, 4, and 5, participants provided duration estimates of periods spent engaged in physical tasks of high intensity and low intensity. Results: In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, participants engaged in physical activity tended to perceive durations as shorter than participants at rest. When completing less familiar tasks (Experiments 4 and 5), however, participants recalled a high intensity bout of physical activity as lasting longer than a low intensity bout of physical activity of comparable duration. Cohen’s d values for physical activity effects on duration estimates ranged from 0.40 to 1.60. Conclusion: The findings, which partially support a contextual-change interpretation, suggest that factors, such as perceived exertion and task familiarity, affect retrospective duration estimates.

Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall F. Gearhart ◽  
M. Daniel Becque ◽  
Chad M. Palm ◽  
Matthew D. Hutchins
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
High Resistance ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Cycle Exercise ◽  
Low Resistance ◽  
Resistance Exercises ◽  
Very High

This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises were defined by 30-sec. maximum tests assigned in counterbalanced order, with resistances set before testing during an orientation session. High resistance was 10% of body mass. Low resistance resulted in the same total work as the high resistance over the 30-sec. sessions (± 5%) but increased pedal rate. RPE was taken at 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 sec. during the high and the low resistance exercises. Measurements were compared using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RPE was significantly greater ( p = .005) for the high than the low resistance exercise at each interval. RPE increased when the subjects were required to pedal against a greater resistance and produce the highest forces. These RPE data are consistent with data from both aerobic cycle and resistance exercise. The data suggest that instantaneous force production, not summed work, is a primary determinant of RPE. All of these observations support Cafarelli's theoretical model of effort sense. In conclusion, as an individual generates more force during high resistance exercise than in light resistance exercise, a potential explanation of our results is that the increased motor outflow and corollary sensory signal lead to a greater sense of effort.

Effects of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing on Upper Body Resistance Exercise Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Ben M. Krings ◽  
Brandon D. Shepherd ◽  
Hunter S. Waldman ◽  
Matthew J. McAllister ◽  
JohnEric W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Exercise Performance ◽  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Aerobic Performance ◽  
Ratings Of Perceived Exertion ◽  
Mouth Rinsing ◽  
Repetitions To Failure

Carbohydrate mouth rinsing has been shown to enhance aerobic exercise performance, but there is limited research with resistance exercise (RE). Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of carbohydrate mouth rinsing during a high-volume upper body RE protocol on performance, heart rate responses, ratings of perceived exertion, and felt arousal. Recreationally experienced resistance-trained males (N = 17, age: 21 ± 1 years, height: 177.3 ± 5.2 cm, mass: 83.5 ± 9.3 kg) completed three experimental sessions, with the first serving as familiarization to the RE protocol. During the final two trials, the participants rinsed a 25-ml solution containing either a 6% carbohydrate solution or an artificially flavored placebo in a randomized, counterbalanced, and double-blinded fashion. The participants rinsed a total of nine times immediately before beginning the protocol and 20 s before repetitions to failure with the exercises bench press, bent-over row, incline bench press, close-grip row, hammer curls, skull crushers (all completed at 70% one-repetition maximum), push-ups, and pull-ups. Heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, and felt arousal were measured at the baseline and immediately after each set of repetitions to failure. There were no differences for the total repetitions completed (carbohydrate = 203 ± 25 repetitions vs. placebo = 201 ± 23 repetitions, p = .46, Cohen’s d = 0.10). No treatment differences were observed for heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, or felt arousal (p > .05). Although carbohydrate mouth rinsing has been shown to be effective in increasing aerobic performance, the results from this investigation show no benefit in RE performance in resistance-trained males.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document