scholarly journals Comparison between automated DNA extraction employing the EZ1 platform and manual methods using real forensic samples

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-56
Author(s):  
PABLO ABDON DA COSTA FRANCEZ ◽  
CIRO AUGUSTO FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA PENIDO ◽  
GILCELENE DO SOCORRO MEDEIROS DE BRITO COSTA ◽  
RODRIGO MATOS DE ALMEIDA ◽  
EDUARDA EMANUELLE SILVA PENA ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1139-1145
Author(s):  
Aroa Silgado ◽  
Zaira Moure ◽  
Maykon T de Oliveira ◽  
Núria Serre-Delcor ◽  
Fernando Salvador ◽  
...  

Aim: This work aimed to compare the sensitivity of four protocols for the detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in 98 blood samples from chronic Chagas disease patients. Materials & methods: Two DNA extraction (automated and manual) methods and two T. cruzi satellite DNA qPCRs (with a recent design and the usually used set of primers) were analyzed. Results: Both DNA extraction methods and qPCR assays tested in this work gave comparable qualitative results, although the lowest Ct values were obtained when samples were analyzed using the new set of primers for T. cruzi satellite DNA. Conclusion: Our results encourage the implementation of automated DNA extraction systems and the new T. cruzi qPCR for the molecular diagnostics and treatment response monitoring of chronic Chagas disease patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. S95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff T. Silva ◽  
Christine Y. Wong ◽  
JoAnn L. Dileanis ◽  
Chad M. Dunn ◽  
Chaka C. Impraim

AMB Express ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athenia L Oldham ◽  
Heather S Drilling ◽  
Blake W Stamps ◽  
Bradley S Stevenson ◽  
Kathleen E Duncan

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Fujii ◽  
Shota Inokuchi ◽  
Tetsushi Kitayama ◽  
Hiroaki Nakahara ◽  
Natsuko Mizuno ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram Bekaert ◽  
Maarten H.D. Larmuseau ◽  
Maarten P.M. Vanhove ◽  
Anouschka Opdekamp ◽  
Ronny Decorte

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Jasmin Zoranjic ◽  
Jasmine W. Tay ◽  
Nicholas S. Mountford ◽  
Marie S. Rye

Bones and teeth are highly challenging sources of DNA in forensic science and human remains identification, requiring multiple laborious processing steps. In this study, we compared an organic phenol–chloroform method to the QIAamp® DNA Investigator and PrepFiler Express BTA™ methods in order to identify the most efficient automated DNA extraction method for bones and teeth. Results from individual tooth powder replicates showed that the PrepFiler Express BTA™ method extracted the highest yields of DNA per mg of tooth powder, returning a minimum of 20/21 PowerPlex® 21 loci. Samples extracted using the organic extraction or QIAamp® DNA Investigator methods produced PowerPlex® 21 profiles displaying a ski-slope morphology. The improved DNA quality and yield from the PrepFiler Express BTA™ method was verified using aged samples, where higher DNA yields per mg of powder and more informative profiles were obtained. Furthermore, the PrepFiler Express BTA™ method subsequently provided useful DNA profiles for two forensic cases involving degraded bone samples. Overall, this study showed that the PrepFiler Express BTA™ chemistry is a reliable and robust method for DNA extraction from bone and teeth samples, and will allow larger numbers of samples to be efficiently extracted in the event of a Disaster Victim Identification event.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document