Effect of naloxone on the development of the positive feed-back action of oestrogen-progesterone on LH secretion in rats

1987 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
María R. Faigón ◽  
Berta Szwarcfarb ◽  
Pablo Scacchi ◽  
Jaime A. Moguilevsky

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of opiate peptides in the development of the positive feedback effect of ovarian hormones (Oe-P) on the LH secretion that matures in female rats at about the age of 20–22 days. Oe-P administration at the age of 14 days induced a significant decrease of LH levels. A single injection of naloxone (5 mg/kg) induced a significant release of LH. This release was completely blocked by Oe-P administration. At the age of 20 days, Oe-P did not induce any significant change of LH levels, whereas naloxone increased the serum LH concentration. On the other hand, injection of Oe-P into naloxone-treated rats induced a significant rise in LH that was significantly higher than that observed with naloxone alone (P <0.025). Oe-P administration induced a positive feedback effect on LH at the age of 25 days. At this age, naloxone also increased LH levels and a significant potentiation of the LH release in response to Oe-P was observed in a group treated with naloxone. These results indicate that naloxone advances the development of the positive feedback mechanism of ovarian hormones on LH secretion and potentiates this mechanism after its maturation. On this basis it is proposed that the probable inhibitory effect of opiates on the onset of the positive feedback mechanism is related to the well-known participation of the opiate system in the onset of puberty. The LH release in response to naloxone significantly decreased from day 14 to day 25 and this could represent a decrease in the inhibitory effect of opiate peptides on LH secretion, probably connected with the onset of the postive feedback mechanism.

Endocrinology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Caraty ◽  
Donal C. Skinner

Abstract The luteal phase elevation in circulating progesterone (P) powerfully inhibits GnRH and, consequently, LH release, thereby preventing premature preovulatory LH surges in the ewe. Whether luteal phase P modulates the response of the GnRH system to the positive feedback effect of estradiol is unknown. To investigate this possibility, two experiments were conducted during the anestrous season using an artificial model of the follicular phase in ovariectomized ewes bearing 10-mm sc 17β-estradiol SILASTIC brand implants (Dow Corning Corp.). In Exp 1, ewes (n = 10) were run through four successive artificial cycles during which a luteal phase level of P was either replaced (cycles 1 and 3) or not replaced (cycles 2 and 4). GnRH and LH secretions were monitored by sampling cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and jugular blood from 10–35 h after four 30-mm 17β-estradiol SILASTIC implants were inserted sc. CSF could be collected from only four ewes over the four cycles. There was no P-dependent difference in the onset of the GnRH and LH surges, which may have been due to a progressive delay in the surge onsets over the four cycles (by ANOVA, P &lt; 0.05). Due to this delay, it was not possible to obtain an accurate estimate of the duration of the GnRH and LH surges in all ewes, but the size of the GnRH surge was always greater when animals had been treated with P, resulting in a significant increase in the maximum (P &lt; 0.01) and mean (P &lt; 0.05) levels during the surge. In contrast, there was no effect on any parameter of LH secretion. In Exp 2, ewes (n = 10) were run through two artificial estrous cycles during which luteal phase P was either replaced or not replaced, using a cross-over experimental design. CSF was collected from seven ewes over the two cycles. GnRH and LH secretions were monitored from 10–53 h after estradiol administration. As in Exp 1, a clear significant increase in the maximal and mean GnRH levels (P &lt; 0.05 for both) was observed during the surge when ewes had been pretreated with P. Again, no changes were observed in LH release during the surge. P priming did, however, delay the onsets of the GnRH (P &lt; 0.01) and LH surges (P &lt; 0.01). Our data show that the increase in P during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle is essential for the full expression of the positive feedback effect of estradiol in inducing the preovulatory GnRH surge in the ewe.


1970 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. TALEISNIK ◽  
M. E. VELASCO ◽  
J. J. ASTRADA

SUMMARY The influence that the interruption of the neural afferents to the hypothalamus exerts on ovulation and on the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) was studied in the rat. Animals with retrochiasmatic sections interrupting the neural connexions between the medial hypothalamus and the preoptic area (POA) showed constant oestrus and failed to ovulate. Animals in which the dorsal neural afferents to the POA were transected had oestrous cycles and ovulated normally. The positive feedback effect of progesterone on LH release in spayed animals primed either with 20 μg. oestradiol benzoate or 2·5 mg. testosterone propionate 3 days before was studied. Transection of the dorsal afferents to the POA favoured an increase in plasma LH, but in animals with retrochiasmatic sections the response was abolished. However, the negative feedback effect of ovarian steroids operated after both types of transection because an increase in plasma LH occurred after ovariectomy. It is concluded that the negative feedback effect of ovarian steroids acts on the medial hypothalamus which can maintain a tonic release of gonadotrophins in the absence of steroids. In contrast, the POA involved in the positive feedback effect of progesterone is concerned with the phasic release of LH.


1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Benjamin Adler

These studies tested the interrelated hypotheses that the ovarian hormones produce their positive feedback effects on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion through activation of noradrenergic and adrenergic systems in specific hypothalamic regions. Furthermore, the ovarian hormones may alter the activity of opioid neuropeptide and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) systems to produce these alterations in catecholamine transmission and gonadotropin secretion. Radioimmunoassays were utilized to determine plasma LH and median eminence LHRH, and hypothalamic catecholamine concentrations were measured by radioenzymatic assay. The first two studies tested whether epinephrine (EPI) synthesis inhibition blocks the accumulation of median eminence LHRH that precedes the ovarian hormone-induced LH surge and also to test whether the stimulatory ovarian hormone regimen enhances the activity of hypothalamic EPI systems. Ovariectomized rats were primed with estradiol (EB), followed 2 days later by progesterone (Prog.). Animals were treated before Prog, administration with saline, one of the EPI synthesis inhibitors SKF 64139 or LY 78335, or the norepinephrine (NE) synthesis inhibitor, FLA-63. The catecholamine synthesis inhibitors blocked or delayed the LH surge. FLA-63 completely prevented the accumulation of LHRH in the median eminence that preceded the rise in LH release. However, selective reduction in EPI levels with SKF 64139 only partially prevented this increase in LHRH. A second EPI synthesis inhibitor, LY 78335, delayed both the LH surge and the rise in LHRH. In a second experiment, the administration of EB plus Prog, to ovariectomized rats increased the alpha-methyltyrosine (aMT) induced depletion of EPI in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH). The depletion of NE after synthesis inhibition was enhanced in both the MBH and preoptic-anterior hypothalamus (POA). Experiments 3 and 4 examined a possible mechanism underlying these ovarian hormone effects on LH release and catecholamine activity. These studies tested whether the opiate antagonist, naloxone, which increases LH release, enhances the activity of NE and EPI neurons in the hypothalamus, and also tested whether morphine, an opiate agonist which decreases LH release, depresses the activity of hypothalamic NE and EPI activity. Administration of naloxone to EB-primed rats increased LH release and potentiated the depletion of NE in the POA and MBH, and enhanced the decline of EPI and dopamine (DA) in the MBH, suggesting increased catecholamine activity in these regions. Administration of the opiate agonist, morphine, to rats pretreated with EB and Prog., decreased LH and decreased the depletion of the catecholamines in the POA and MBH, suggesting reduced activity. In most cases, naloxone antagonized the inhibitory effect of morphine. Experiments 3, 6, and 7 examined the involvement of (GABA) systems in the positive feedback effects of EB and Prog, on LHRH and LH release. These studies tested 1) the effects of GABAergic drugs on the LH surge induced by EB and Prog., 2) whether GABA agonists reduce NE and EPI activity in the hypothalamus, and 3) whether a GABA agonist prevents the accumulation of median eminence LHRH induced by EB and Prog. Ovariectomized rats received the stimulatory EB plus Prog, treatment. Simultaneously with Prog., rats received either saline, the barbiturate, phenobarbital, the GABAg agonist, baclofen, the GABA^ agonist, muscimol, or either the GABA^ antagonist, bicuculline, or the putative GABAg antagonist, 5-aminovalerate. Additional experiments tested the effects of the GABA drugs on LH release in ovariectomized, hormonally untreated rats and in response to exogenous LHRH. The LH surge induced by EB+Prog. was blocked by treatment with either baclofen, muscimol, or phenobarbital. Bicuculline was ineffective in preventing the effect of baclofen and phonobarbital but partially prevented the effect of muscimol. Neither baclofen nor muscimol significantly affected LH release in hormonally untreated, ovariectomized rats or in rats receiving LHRH administration. In the results of Experiment 6, in EB plus Prog.-treated rats, baclofen and muscimol significantly reduced the concentrations of EPI and NE in the POA and MBH and prevented their decline after administration of otMT, suggesting decreased catecholamine transmission. In Experiment 7, rats were primed with the ovarian hormones and received, concurrently with Prog., either saline, or baclofen. The GABAg agonist, baclofen, blocked the LH surge and selectively increased LHRH concentrations. Experiment 8 tested 1) whether baclofen reverses the enhancement of LH release and catecholamine activity produced by naloxone, and 2) whether the opiate antagonist, nalmefene, prevents the blockade of the LH surge produced by baclofen. In the first study of Experiment 8, naloxone increased LH release and enhanced catecholamine activity in EB-primed rats. Baclofen was unable to reverse these effects. In the second study, baclofen administration to EB plus P treated rats blocked the LH surge and concomitant administration of nalmefene was unable to prevent this effect of baclofen. These results suggest that: 1) the ovarian hormones activate both NE and EPI systems to stimulate the early afternoon rise of LHRH in the median eminence and to induce the subsequent LH surge, 2) the ovarian hormones may produce their positive feedback effects on LH secretion by removing an inhibitory GABA or opioid neuropeptide influence on catecholamine transmission, allowing NE and EPI to stimulate LHRH, and subsequently, LH release, and 3) these modulatory actions of GABA and opiates may represent effects of two parallel, yet independent hypothalamic systems which regulate catecholamine neurotransmission and subsequently LH secretion.


1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (3) ◽  
pp. E507-E511 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Dondi ◽  
P. Limonta ◽  
R. Maggi ◽  
F. Piva

These experiments were performed to analyze whether treatments of ovariectomized female rats with ovarian steroid regimens able to induce either an increase (positive feedback effect) or a decrease (negative feedback effect) of serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) have some impact on the characteristics of mu-opioid binding sites in circumscribed areas of the brain. The increase of serum levels of LH elicited by a treatment with estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P; positive feedback effect) was accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of mu-binding sites in the hypothalamus and in the corpus striatum. The decrease in serum levels of LH induced by a treatment with EB alone (negative feedback effect) brought about a significant increase of the number of mu-binding sites in the thalamus and in the hippocampus. These results seem to suggest that the release of LH induced by EB plus P may involve a decrease of hypothalamic mu-binding sites. Apparently, the inhibitory effect on LH release exerted by EB alone does not involve any change of the density of these binding sites in the hypothalamus.


1980 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
PJ Wright ◽  
T Stelmasiak ◽  
WA Chamley

Oestradiol-17 p (40 fig intravenously) failed to elicit a surge in plasma LH levels by 13 h after administration in 64 % (16 out of 25) Merino ewes about 30 days post partum in the anoestrous season. LH-RH responsiveness and LH-RH priming effect were significantly greater in these ewes than in similar post-partum (n = 9) and non-parturient ewes (n = 3) not treated with oestradiol. This suggests that the failure of the oestrogen-positive feedback effect on LH release in post-partum ewes is not due to a failure of oestradiol action on the pituitary increasing pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH and LH-RH priming effect, but could be due to inadequate release of LH-RH from the hypothalamus.


1982 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Koike ◽  
Toshihiro Aono ◽  
Hirohisa Tsutsumi ◽  
Akira Miyake ◽  
Keiichi Kurachi

Abstract. The effect of hyperprolactinaemia on the hypothalamo-pituitary axis was assessed by iv injection of 100 μg luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LRH) in 7 women with prolactinoma before and 3 months after normalization of the Prl level by transsphenoidal surgery. A dose of 20 mg of conjugated oestrogen (Premarin®) was also injected iv into patients with prolactinoma before and 4 months after surgery, and the serum LH levels were determined serially for 120 h after the injection. Surgical treatment caused significant reduction of the mean (± se) serum prolactin (Prl) level from 123.3 ± 7.8 to 19.4 ± 5.6 ng/ml. But the differences in the basal levels of LH (11.3 ± 2.2 to 8.6 ± 1.5 mIU/ml), FSH (8.3 ± 2.4 to 10.6 ± 3.7 mIU/ml) and oestradiol (26.6 ± 8.6 to 37.5 ± 5.5 pg/ml) before and 4 months after surgery were not significant. An exaggerated LH response to LRH in untreated prolactinoma patients was also observed after surgical treatment. After surgical treatment, patients showed LH release with a peak between 48 and 72 h after the injection of Premarin, whereas before treatment they did not show any LH discharge. The mean percent increase in LH between 48 and 72 h was also significantly higher after operation than before operation. These results suggest that the hyperprolactinaemia in prolactinoma patients may cause an impaired positive feedback effect of oestrogen on LH release and that this derangement can be reversed by reduction of the Prl level by adenomectomy.


Endocrinology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (9) ◽  
pp. 4213-4220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Olivier Latchoumanin ◽  
Ika P. Sari ◽  
Richard J. Lang ◽  
Harold A. Coleman ◽  
...  

Abstract In pituitary gonadotropes, estrogens have biphasic actions to cause an initial negative feedback followed by a positive feedback on LH secretion, but the mechanisms involved are not clearly understood. To investigate the feedback effects of estrogen, we used mixed ovine pituitary cell cultures (48–72 h), which were treated with 10−9m estradiol-17β (E2) or vehicle followed by a pulse of 10−9m GnRH. Medium was collected for LH assay and cells extracted to determine activation of MAPK (phosphorylated ERK-1/2). E2 treatment for 5 min reduced GnRH-induced LH release and caused phosphorylation of ERK-1/2. E2 alone also caused phosphorylation of ERK-1/2, similar to the response evoked by GnRH alone. GnRH increased cytoplasmic intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and this was abolished by 2 min pretreatment with E2 or E-bovine serum albumen conjugate. Blockade of Ca2+ channels with nifedipine had no effect on the initial peak of GnRH-induced increase in [Ca2+]i but reduced its duration by 27 ± 6%. Depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores with thapsigargin prevented GnRH-induced increase in [Ca2+]i. Thapsigargin (10−7m) or nifedipine (10−5m) pretreatment (15 min) of cells lowered GnRH-induced LH secretion by 30 ± 6 and 50% ± 4%, respectively. We conclude that inhibition of the GnRH-induced increase in [Ca2+]i in gonadotropes by E2 is a likely mechanism for the negative feedback effect of E2 on LH secretion involving a rapid nongenomic effect of E2. Activation of the MAPK pathway by E2 may be the mechanism for the time-delayed positive feedback effect on LH secretion at the level of the gonadotrope.


1984 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Carter ◽  
J. S. Cooper ◽  
S. E. Inkster ◽  
S. A. Whitehead

ABSTRACT The effects of acute and sub-chronic hyperprolactinaemia on the positive feedback action of progesterone in oestrogen-primed ovariectomized rats have been compared. A single injection of ovine prolactin administered with progesterone had no effect on the LH surge measured 5 h later although hyperprolactinaemia induced by 5-day treatment with the dopamine antagonist, domperidone, markedly attenuated the surge. Repeated injections of naloxone (5 mg/kg) during the development of the progesterone-stimulated LH surge completely reversed this inhibitory effect of hyperprolactinaemia, but had no apparent effect on the positive feedback action in control animals. In oestrogen-primed animals similar treatment with naloxone (0·4 and 5 mg/kg) stimulated LH secretion but the increase was significantly smaller than that observed after injecting progesterone. It is suggested that hyperprolactinaemia increases the inhibitory opioid modulation of LH release and that this effect is responsible for the impairment of the positive feedback action of progesterone. J. Endocr. (1984) 101, 57–61


1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
El TERASAWA ◽  
JORGE F. RODRIGUEZ-SIERRA ◽  
DONALD J. DIERSCHKE ◽  
WILLIAM E. BRIDSON ◽  
ROBERT W. GOY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document