Efficacy and safety of denosumab therapy for low bone mineral density in childhood cancer survivors: A report of preliminary experience

Author(s):  
Huang TH ◽  
Liu HC ◽  
Hou JY ◽  
Chang CY ◽  
Sun FJ ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9157-9157
Author(s):  
A. C. Dietz ◽  
L. Polgreen ◽  
A. Petryk ◽  
W. Leisenring ◽  
P. Goodman ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Jung Choi ◽  
Sun Young Park ◽  
Won Kyoung Cho ◽  
Jae Wook Lee ◽  
Kyoung Soon Cho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yun Jung Choi ◽  
Moon Hee Lee ◽  
Won Kyoung Cho ◽  
Kyoung Soon Cho ◽  
So Hyun Park ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Chen ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Yiqin Zhou ◽  
Jinhui Peng ◽  
Bo Wang

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody, acts against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand and is a promising antiresorptive agent in patients with osteoporosis. This study aimed to update the efficacy and safety of denosumab vs. placebo in osteoporosis or low bone mineral density (BMD) postmenopausal women. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety data of denosumab vs. placebo in osteoporosis or low BMD postmenopausal women. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled weight mean differences (WMDs) or relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment effectiveness of denosumab vs. placebo. Eleven RCTs including 12,013 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or low BMD were preferred for the final meta-analysis. The summary results indicated that the percentage change of BMD in the denosumab group was greater than that of BMD in placebo at 1/3 radius (WMD: 3.43; 95%CI: 3.24–3.62; p < 0.001), femoral neck (WMD: 3.05; 95%CI: 1.78–4.33; p < 0.001), lumbar spine (WMD: 6.25; 95%CI: 4.59–7.92; p < 0.001), total hip (WMD: 4.36; 95%CI: 4.07–4.66; p < 0.001), trochanter (WMD: 6.00; 95%CI: 5.95–6.05; p < 0.001), and total body (WMD: 3.20; 95%CI: 2.03–4.38; p < 0.001). Moreover, denosumab therapy significantly reduced the risk of clinical fractures (RR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.51–0.63; p < 0.001), nonvertebral fracture (RR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.70–0.97; p = 0.018), vertebral fracture (RR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.25–0.40; p < 0.001), and hip fracture (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.37–0.98; p = 0.042). Finally, denosumab did not cause excess risks of adverse events. These findings suggested that postmenopausal women receiving denosumab had increased BMDs and reduced fractures at various sites without inducing any adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document