scholarly journals Telomerase Is Essential to Alleviate Pif1-Induced Replication Stress at Telomeres

Genetics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 779-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chang ◽  
Brian Luke ◽  
Claudine Kraft ◽  
Zhijian Li ◽  
Matthias Peter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Response Factors ◽  
Growth Defects ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Complete Set ◽  
Dependent Growth ◽  
Dose Dependent

Pif1, an evolutionarily conserved helicase, negatively regulates telomere length by removing telomerase from chromosome ends. Pif1 has also been implicated in DNA replication processes such as Okazaki fragment maturation and replication fork pausing. We find that overexpression of Saccharomyces cervisiae PIF1 results in dose-dependent growth inhibition. Strong overexpression causes relocalization of the DNA damage response factors Rfa1 and Mre11 into nuclear foci and activation of the Rad53 DNA damage checkpoint kinase, indicating that the toxicity is caused by accumulation of DNA damage. We screened the complete set of ∼4800 haploid gene deletion mutants and found that moderate overexpression of PIF1, which is only mildly toxic on its own, causes growth defects in strains with mutations in genes involved in DNA replication and the DNA damage response. Interestingly, we find that telomerase-deficient strains are also sensitive to PIF1 overexpression. Our data are consistent with a model whereby increased levels of Pif1 interfere with DNA replication, causing collapsed replication forks. At chromosome ends, collapsed forks result in truncated telomeres that must be rapidly elongated by telomerase to maintain viability.

scholarly journals The Intra- and Extra-Telomeric Role of TRF2 in the DNA Damage Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (18) ◽  
pp. 9900
Author(s):  
Siti A. M. Imran ◽  
Muhammad Dain Yazid ◽  
Wei Cui ◽  
Yogeswaran Lokanathan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Response Factors ◽  
Telomere Repeat ◽  
Protection Mechanism ◽  
Dna Instability ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Break

Telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) has a well-known function at the telomeres, which acts to protect the telomere end from being recognized as a DNA break or from unwanted recombination. This protection mechanism prevents DNA instability from mutation and subsequent severe diseases caused by the changes in DNA, such as cancer. Since TRF2 actively inhibits the DNA damage response factors from recognizing the telomere end as a DNA break, many more studies have also shown its interactions outside of the telomeres. However, very little has been discovered on the mechanisms involved in these interactions. This review aims to discuss the known function of TRF2 and its interaction with the DNA damage response (DDR) factors at both telomeric and non-telomeric regions. In this review, we will summarize recent progress and findings on the interactions between TRF2 and DDR factors at telomeres and outside of telomeres.

scholarly journals Werner Helicase Control of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1-E2 DNA Replication Is Regulated by SIRT1 Deacetylation

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipon Das ◽  
Molly L. Bristol ◽  
Nathan W. Smith ◽  
Claire D. James ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Repair Protein

ABSTRACTHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) are double-stranded DNA viruses causative in a host of human diseases, including several cancers. Following infection, two viral proteins, E1 and E2, activate viral replication in association with cellular factors and stimulate the DNA damage response (DDR) during the replication process. E1-E2 uses homologous recombination (HR) to facilitate DNA replication, but an understanding of host factors involved in this process remains incomplete. Previously, we demonstrated that the class III deacetylase SIRT1, which can regulate HR, is recruited to E1-E2-replicating DNA and regulates the level of replication. Here, we demonstrate that SIRT1 promotes the fidelity of E1-E2 replication and that the absence of SIRT1 results in reduced recruitment of the DNA repair protein Werner helicase (WRN) to E1-E2-replicating DNA. CRISPR/Cas9 editing demonstrates that WRN, like SIRT1, regulates the quantity and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. This is the first report of WRN regulation of E1-E2 DNA replication, or a role for WRN in the HPV life cycle. In the absence of SIRT1 there is an increased acetylation and stability of WRN, but a reduced ability to interact with E1-E2-replicating DNA. We present a model in which E1-E2 replication turns on the DDR, stimulating SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN. This deacetylation promotes WRN interaction with E1-E2-replicating DNA to control the quantity and fidelity of replication. As well as offering a crucial insight into HPV replication control, this system offers a unique model for investigating the link between SIRT1 and WRN in controlling replication in mammalian cells.IMPORTANCEHPV16 is the major viral human carcinogen responsible for between 3 and 4% of all cancers worldwide. Following infection, this virus activates the DNA damage response (DDR) to promote its life cycle and recruits DDR proteins to its replicating DNA in order to facilitate homologous recombination during replication. This promotes the production of viable viral progeny. Our understanding of how HPV16 replication interacts with the DDR remains incomplete. Here, we demonstrate that the cellular deacetylase SIRT1, which is a part of the E1-E2 replication complex, regulates recruitment of the DNA repair protein WRN to the replicating DNA. We demonstrate that WRN regulates the level and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. Overall, the results suggest a mechanism by which SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN promotes its interaction with E1-E2-replicating DNA to control the levels and fidelity of that replication.

scholarly journals Replication-Dependent DNA Damage Response Triggered by Roscovitine Induces an Uncoupling of DNA Replication Proteins

Cell Cycle ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 2153-2159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Savio ◽  
Michaela Cerri ◽  
Ornella Cazzalini ◽  
Paola Perucca ◽  
Lucia A. Stivala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Damage Response

Quantitative analysis of DNA-damage response factors after sequential ion microirradiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Greubel ◽  
Volker Hable ◽  
Guido A. Drexler ◽  
Andreas Hauptner ◽  
Steffen Dietzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Response Factors ◽  
Damage Response

Coordinated Chromatin-Association of Fanconi Anemia Network Proteins Requires Replication-Coupled DNA Damage Recognition.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 723-723
Author(s):  
Alexandra Sobeck ◽  
Stacie Stone ◽  
Bendert deGraaf ◽  
Vincenzo Costanzo ◽  
Johan deWinter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Core Complex ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Crosslinking Agents

Abstract Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents and diverse clinical symptoms, including developmental anomalies, progressive bone marrow failure, and predisposition to leukemias and other cancers. FA is genetically heterogeneous, resulting from mutations in any of at least eleven different genes. The FA proteins function together in a pathway composed of a mulitprotein core complex that is required to trigger the DNA-damage dependent activation of the downstream FA protein, FANCD2. This activation is thought to be the key step in a DNA damage response that functionally links FA proteins to major breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA2 is FA gene FANCD1). The essential function of the FA proteins is unknown, but current models suggest that FA proteins function at the interface between cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair and DNA replication, and are likely to play roles in the DNA damage response during S phase. To provide a platform for dissecting the key functional events during S-phase, we developed cell-free assays for FA proteins based on replicating extracts from Xenopus eggs. We identified the Xenopus homologs of human FANCD2 (xFANCD2) and several of the FA core complex proteins (xCCPs), and biochemically characterized these proteins in replicating cell-free extracts. We found that xCCPs and a modified isoform of xFANCD2 become associated with chromatin during normal and disrupted DNA replication. Blocking initiation of replication with geminin demonstrated that association of xCCPs and xFANCD2 with chromatin occurs in a strictly replication-dependent manner that is enhanced following DNA damage by crosslinking agents or by addition of aphidicolin, an inhibitor of replicative DNA polymerases. In addition, chromatin binding of xFANCD2, but not xBRCA2, is abrogated when xFANCA is quantitatively depleted from replicating extracts suggesting that xFANCA promotes the loading of xFANCD2 on chromatin. The chromatin-association of xFANCD2 and xCCPs is diminished in the presence of caffeine, an inhibitor of checkpoint kinases. Taken together, our data suggest a model in which the ordered loading of FA proteins on chromatin is required for processing a subset of DNA replication-blocking lesions that are resolved during late stages of replication.

scholarly journals Identification of S-phase DNA damage-response targets in fission yeast reveals conservation of damage-response networks

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (26) ◽  
pp. E3676-E3685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Willis ◽  
Chunshui Zhou ◽  
Andrew E. H. Elia ◽  
Johanne M. Murray ◽  
Antony M. Carr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Damage Response

The cellular response to DNA damage during S-phase regulates a complicated network of processes, including cell-cycle progression, gene expression, DNA replication kinetics, and DNA repair. In fission yeast, this S-phase DNA damage response (DDR) is coordinated by two protein kinases: Rad3, the ortholog of mammalian ATR, and Cds1, the ortholog of mammalian Chk2. Although several critical downstream targets of Rad3 and Cds1 have been identified, most of their presumed targets are unknown, including the targets responsible for regulating replication kinetics and coordinating replication and repair. To characterize targets of the S-phase DDR, we identified proteins phosphorylated in response to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-induced S-phase DNA damage in wild-type, rad3∆, and cds1∆ cells by proteome-wide mass spectrometry. We found a broad range of S-phase–specific DDR targets involved in gene expression, stress response, regulation of mitosis and cytokinesis, and DNA replication and repair. These targets are highly enriched for proteins required for viability in response to MMS, indicating their biological significance. Furthermore, the regulation of these proteins is similar in fission and budding yeast, across 300 My of evolution, demonstrating a deep conservation of S-phase DDR targets and suggesting that these targets may be critical for maintaining genome stability in response to S-phase DNA damage across eukaryotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document