scholarly journals Three Weekly Irinotecan and Bolus 5-Fluorouracil Combination in the First Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer - A Single Institution Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mesmoudi ◽  
Tarik Mahfoud ◽  
Samir Ahid ◽  
Nabil Ismaili ◽  
Saber Boutayeb ◽  
...  

Background: The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a non-platinum based chemotherapy combination using irinotecan associated to bolus 5-FU as first line treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Materiel and methods: Retrospective analysis of a population of patients treated for metastatic and locally advanced gastric cancer with irinotecan and 5-FU as upfront chemotherapy. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years. Seven patients were males and six were of females. Ten patients had a metastatic disease and three patients had a locally advanced disease. Patients received a total number of 43 cycles of chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 38,4%, median time to progression (TTP) was 3 months, and median overall survival was 4 months. Three patients (23,1%) presented grade 3 /4 neutropenia complicated with an infectious episode with fever in two cases, three patients (23,1%) required blood transfusion for a grade 4 anemia, and one patient (7,6%) was hospitalized for a severe episode of diarrhea. Conclusion: Three weekly irinotecan and bolus 5-FU is an interesting combination as first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer; designed clinical trials are needed to confirm the activity of this combination.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Glenjen ◽  
Katrin Hammerling ◽  
Ingunn Hatlevoll ◽  
Rune Småland ◽  
Petra Weber Hauge ◽  
...  

71 Background: The Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG) conducted a phase II randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of FLOX and FLIRI as first line treatment in metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer. At progression or unacceptable drug related toxicity, a crossover to the other treatment arm should be done, if second line chemotherapy was indicated. Methods: 66 patients from 6 treatment centers in Norway were randomized to FLOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2, or FLIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1, bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2). Both treatments were repeated every second week. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety data. Results: At the present time data from 63 patients are available for analysis. First-line treatment: FLOX (n = 32) versus (v.) FLIRI (n = 31): Complete response (CR) n = 0 in both arms, partial response (PR) n = 16 v. 9, stable disease (SD) n = 12 v. 13, progressive disease (PD) n = 3 v. 6, not assessable for evaluation n = 1 v. 3 patients. RR was 50 % in the FLOX arm v. 29 % in the FLIRI arm, p = not significant (n.s), Pearson Chi-Square test. Median TTP was 5 months (95 % CI 2.2-7.8) v. 4 months (95 % CI 2.2-5.8), p = n.s, median OS was 11 months (95 % CI 9.2-12.8 ) v. 10 months (95 % CI 5.7-14.3), p = n.s, Log Rank test. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Febrile neutropenia was present among 10 % of the patients in the FLOX arm versus 7 % in the FLIRI arm. Second line treatment: 30 patients received second line treatment with FLOX or FLIRI. Data regarding RR, TTP, OS and safety will be updated in December 2011. Conclusions: The FLOX and FLIRI regimens are well tolerated among patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. As first line treatment the FLOX regime had a higher RR of 50% v. 29% for the FLIRI regime, longer TTP; 5 v. 4 months and longer OS 11 v. 10 months, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Jiang Dian Wang ◽  
...  

161 Background: Standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer includes combination chemotherapy with a platinum agent and a fluoropyrimidine. The anti–PD-1 humanized monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab (pembro) has shown promising antitumor activity as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer. We report preliminary safety data for pts with advanced gastric cancer treated with pembro + cisplatin and 5-FU in the multicohort, phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 study (NCT02335411). Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥ 18 y and had HER2– relapsed or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-1, and no prior therapy for metastatic disease. Pts received pembro 200 mg + 5-FU 800 mg/m2 (or capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 in Japan) + cisplatin 80 mg/m2 Q3W for 6 cycles followed by pembro + 5-FU for up to 2 y or until confirmed progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator decision. Primary end point was safety and tolerability of the combination. Results: Of the 17 pts enrolled (10 from Asia, 7 from outside Asia), 70.6% were men, and median age was 58.0 y. Three pts (17.6%) had a prior gastrectomy—2 total, 1 partial. As of the Aug 12, 2015, data cutoff date, median follow-up duration was 3.6 mo (range 2.6-5.4), and pts received a median of 5 treatment cycles (range 3-7). Only 1 pt (5.9%) discontinued treatment (due to progressive disease). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations. Twelve pts (70.6%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade, most commonly neutropenia/decreased neutrophils (n = 7, 41.2%), stomatitis (n = 6, 35.3%), and decreased appetite (n = 5, 29.4%). Eight pts (47.1%) experienced ≥ 1 grade 3-4 treatment-related AE; only neutropenia/decreased neutrophils (n = 4 [23.5%] grade 3, n = 3 [17.6%] grade 4) occurred in > 1 pt. AEs of interest based on immune etiology, regardless of attribution by investigator, were grade 2 infusion-related reaction and grade 2 pruritus (n = 1 [5.9%] each). Conclusions: Preliminary data from KEYNOTE-059 suggest the combination of pembro, cisplatin, and 5-FU has a manageable safety profile as first-line therapy in pts with advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.


2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162096982
Author(s):  
Mustafa Gürbüz ◽  
Erman Akkuş ◽  
Abdullah Sakin ◽  
Semiha Urvay ◽  
Atike Gökçen Demiray ◽  
...  

Purpose: Taxane-containing combinations are recommended for the first-line therapy of advanced gastric cancer. It is not known which chemotherapy regimen is the best with trastuzumab for HER2-positive patients. The aim of this study was to compare taxane-containing intensified chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: This study is a retrospective multicenter study of the Turkish Oncology Group. A total of 130 HER2-positive patients with inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma being given chemotherapy plus trastuzumab as the first-line treatment were included from 16 different oncology centers. Trastuzumab combination with intensified chemotherapy including taxane or standard chemotherapy was compared in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: There were 108 patients in the standard and 22 patients in the intensified chemotherapy group. PFS of the standard and intensified group were 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8–6.4) and 5.3 months (95% CI 2.6–8), respectively ( p = 0.70). OS of the standard and intensified group were 11.1 months (95% CI 8.3–13.9) and 15.2 months (95% CI 12.7–17.7), respectively ( p = 0.03). Repeated analysis excluding patients given any previous therapy revealed similar results. The intensified group had more fever and febrile neutropenia. Conclusion: Trastuzumab combination with intensified chemotherapy provides better OS in first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Further large-scale studies should be performed in HER2-positive patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15062-15062
Author(s):  
R. Xu ◽  
B. Han ◽  
Y. Shi ◽  
J. Xiong ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
...  

15062 Background: The survival of advanced gastric cancer remains poor, while no chemotherapy regimen was recognized standard. Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (Xeloda) have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer. The present study was conducted to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX (Oxaliplatin and Xeloda) regimen in gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled into this study. They all receive the XELOX regimens (Oxaliplatin 130mg/ m2 intravenously in 2 hours on day 1 followed by oral capecitabine 1000mg/ m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks).We evaluated the response every 2 cycles. Results: The median age of the total enrolled 45 patients was 55 years (range, 22–82 years), including 32 male and 13 female. They received a median of 5 cycles (range, 2–8 cycles) of XELOX. 21 of 45 patients (46.7%) achieved an objective response, 1 patient (2.2%) had completed response. 17 patients (37.8%) experienced stable disease. Median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median overall survival were not available yet due to the further follow-up needed. Most toxicity events were mild to moderate in XELOX regimen, with grade 3/4 neutropenia of 8.9 %, thrombocytopenia of 6.7%, anemia of 11.1%, hand-foot syndrome of 6.7 % and diarrhea of 6.7 %. Grade 3 neuropathy was 4.4%. The patients with advanced gastric cancer had a good tolerance to this chemotherapy. Conclusions: XELOX is a highly effective first-line treatment for unrsectable and metastatic gastric cancer. The response rates in this trial seems to be similar to those observed with FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin combinations. XELOX is tolerable well in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 205-205
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Manabu Ohashi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Takuro Mizukami ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
...  

205 Background:TAS-118 (S-1 and leucovorin) + oxaliplatin (L-OHP) improved overall survival (OS) compared to S-1 + cisplatin for patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (GC) (Kang, Lancet Oncol. 2020). This study investigated the feasibility of peri (pre and post)-operative (op) chemotherapy (chemo) with TAS-118 ± L-OHP in pts with locally advanced resectable GC. While it was reported that pre-op TAS-118 + L-OHP followed by D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficay (Takahari, ASCO-GI. 2020), the recommended post-op chemo regimen, TAS-118 or TAS-118 + L-OHP, has yet to be determined. Methods:Eligible pts with GC of clinical T3-4N1-3M0 were enrolled. The protocol treatment consisted of pre-op chemo with 4 courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily, 7 days) + L-OHP (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day 1) in a 2-week cycle, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by post-op chemo with 12 courses of TAS-118 (step 1) and 8 courses of TAS-118 + L-OHP (step 2). Step 2 was started if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in < 6 of 10 pts in step 1. Up to 20 pts were included in the analysis of feasibility after a recommended regimen was determined. Results:Between December 2016 and February 2019, 45 pts were enrolled. The numbers of pts with cT3/4a and cN1/2/3 were 13/32 and 25/17/3, respectively. Excluding 14 pts (4 achieving pathological complete response, 4 not satisfying the criteria for post-op chemo, 3 physician judgement or pt withdrawal, 2 progressive disease, 1 adverse event [AE]), 31 pts (11/20 in step 1/2) received the post-op chemo. No DLT was observed in either step. The post-op chemo completion rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 63.6-99.5) in step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI, 59.9-92.9) in step 2. The median relative dose intensity of TAS-118 in step 1 was 83.3%, and those of TAS-118 and L-OHP in step 2 were 69.9% and 74.3%, respectively. One pt in step 2 discontinued post-op chemo due to AE. Grade ³ 3 AEs observed in ≥ 10% of pts were weight loss in both step 1 and step 2 (2 in each), and hypokalemia (n = 3) and neutropenia (n = 2) in step 2. At 1-year follow-up after the last pt was enrolled, recurrence-free survival and OS rates were 91.1% (95% CI, 78.0-96.6) and 100%, respectively at 12 months, and 69.1% (95% CI, 49.6-82.3) and 95.5% (95% CI, 71.9-99.3), respectively at 24 months. Conclusions:Taken together with the feasibility and efficacy of pre-op chemo, peri-op chemo with TAS-118 + L-OHP with D2 gastrectomy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000024688.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 8301-8307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Osumi ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mariko Ogura ◽  
Takashi Ichimura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Dongping Chen ◽  
Chaosu Hu ◽  
...  

LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78]). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document