The Damaging Outcome of the POLAR Phase III Trials Was Due to Avoidable Time-Dependent Redox Interaction between Oxaliplatin and PledOx

On 2 July 2021, highly negative results were reported from the POLAR A and M phase III trials in patients with colorectal cancer, treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen and co-treated with calmangafodipir (CaM; PledOx®; PledPharma AB/Egetis Therapeutics AB) or placebo. The results revealed persistent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in 54.8% of the patients treated with PledOx, compared with 40.0% of the patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.05), i.e., a 37% increase in incidence of the side effect that the trial was aimed to prevent. The damaging outcome of the trials differed diametrically from an in-parallel conducted mice study and from a clinical trial with mangafodipir, the active ingredient of CaM. According to the authors of the POLAR report, the etiology of the profound increase in CIPN in the PledOx arm is unclear. However, these devastating effects are presumably explained by intravenous administrations of PledOx and oxaliplatin being too close in time and, thereby, causing unfavorable redox interactions between Mn2+ and Pt2−. In the mice study as well as in the preceding phase II clinical trial (PLIANT), PledOx was administered 10 min before the start of the oxaliplatin infusion; this was clearly an administration procedure, where the devastating interactions between PledOx and oxaliplatin could be avoided. However, when it comes to the POLAR trials, PledOx was administered, for incomprehensible reasons, “on Top of Modified FOLFOX6” at day one, i.e., after the two-hour oxaliplatin infusion instead of before oxaliplatin. This is a time point when the plasma concentration of oxaliplatin and Pt2+-metabolites is at its highest, and where the risk of devastating redox interactions between PledOx and oxaliplatin, in turn, is at its highest.

WJOG10517G: a multicenter Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases

Gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases, defined as massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake, have been excluded from clinical trials of new treatments due to poor prognosis and tumor-related complications, such as ileus. Based on the results of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study, their prognosis when treated with 5-fluorouracil/ l-leucovorin or 5-fluorouracil/ l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel remained extremely poor in this setting. Retrospective studies have shown the promising efficacy of the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, with improved ascites and oral intake. Therefore, we planned a Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases (jRCTs041180007). The primary end point is overall survival, with an exploratory analysis comparing the findings with those of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study using Bayes' theorem. Trial registration Identifier: jRCTs041180007 (jRCTs: the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials).

Efficacy of modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy for patients with unresectable pseudomyxoma peritonei

Background Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare malignancy, and there is insufficient evidence about systemic chemotherapy for this disease. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a chemotherapeutic regimen with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6, mFOLFOX6) for patients with unresectable pseudomyxoma peritonei. Patients who received the therapy between April 2000 and February 2019 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, were enrolled in this study. Results Eight patients were treated with mFOLFOX6. The sites of primary tumor were appendix in six patients, ovary in a patient, and urachus in a patient. Six patients received surgery. Seven patients had histologically high-grade PMP, and one patient had low-grade PMP. The median follow-up duration was 27.2 months. All the patients had non-measurable regions as the targets of tumor response. Non-complete response or non-progressive disease was observed in seven patients, with a disease control rate of 87.5%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.0 months and 27.9 months, respectively. An obvious reduction in the symptoms was observed in two patients. Five patients experienced decline in the serum tumor markers, CEA or CA19-9. The grade 3/4 toxicity that was observed was grade 4 neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 neutropenia in two patients. Conclusions mFOLFOX6 might be an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with unresectable PMP. To our knowledge, this is the first case series of mFOLFOX6 in patients with unresectable PMP and the first case series of systemic chemotherapy for Asian patients with unresectable PMP.