scholarly journals Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-238
Author(s):  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Zhengbiao Xue ◽  
Dongqian Yi ◽  
Xiaobo Li ◽  
Yanwu Tan ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Fu Lee ◽  
Lai-Chu See ◽  
Pei-Ru Li ◽  
Jia-Rou Liu ◽  
Tze-Fan Chao ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of lower limb events for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods and results In this nationwide retrospective cohort study collected from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a total of 5768 and 2034 consecutive AF patients with PAD patients taking NOACs or warfarin were identified from 1 June 2012 to 31 December 2017, respectively. We used propensity score stabilized weighting to balance covariates across study groups. In the cohort, there were 89% patients were taking low-dose NOAC (dabigatran 110 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 10–15 mg daily, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, or edoxaban 30 mg daily). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant was associated with a comparable risk of ischaemic stroke, and a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42–0.87; P = 0.007], lower extremity thromboembolism (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44–0.72; P < 0.0001), revascularization procedure (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47–0.72; P < 0.0001), lower limb amputation (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23–0.46; P < 0.0001), and all major bleeding (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.80; P = 0.0001) than warfarin after weighting. The advantage of NOACs over warfarin persisted in high-risk subgroups including patients of ≥75 years of age, diabetes, renal impairment, or use of concomitant antiplatelet agent. Conclusion  This population-based study indicated that NOACs were associated with a comparable risk of ischaemic stroke, and a significantly lower risk of major adverse limb events and major bleeding than warfarin among AF patients with concomitant PAD. Therefore, thromboprophylaxis with NOACs may be considered for such patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Stephan ◽  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Corina Mirea ◽  
Alix Faller ◽  
Anne Lejay ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamil ◽  
T S G Sehested ◽  
K Houlind ◽  
J Flensted Lassen ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an important and inadequately addressed issue. Our aim was to examine temporal trends in the incidence of AF and stroke in patients with PAD. Methods Danish nationwide registers were used to identify all patients aged ≥18 years, with first-time diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2015. Age-standardized incidence rates per 1.000 person-years were calculated to estimate trends of AF and stroke. Risk of AF and stroke was furthermore estimated by 1-year cumulative-incidence divided into four year-groups. Results A total of 121.211 patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD were included. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of AF in patients with PAD were 1.97% for year 1997–2000, 2.63% for year 2001–2005, 2.66% for year 2006–2010, and 2.78% for year 2011–2015, respectively. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of stroke in patients with PAD were 2.71%, 2.71%, 1.95%, and 1.81%, for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2015 year-groups respectively. Likewise, the age-standardized incidence rates showed increasing trends of AF during the study period whereas trends of stroke demonstrated a decline (Figure 1). All age-standardized trends were statistically significant (p<0.05). During the course of study i.e., between 1997 and 2015, the initiation of cholesterol-lowering agents, clopidogrel, and oral anticoagulants increased markedly from 7.0% to 51.3%, 0.1% to 5.9%, and 0.0% to 0.7%, respectively. Figure 1 Conclusion The incidence of AF in patients with PAD has significantly increased over time whereas a marked decline has occurred in the incidence of stroke. This suggests that the secondary prevention strategies aimed at reducing risk of stroke are broadly effective. Moreover, due to global aging, earlier and more frequent diagnosis, and improved treatment of cardiovascular risk factors may explain the increasing incidence of AF.


Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110036
Author(s):  
Meina Lv ◽  
Shaojun Jiang ◽  
Tingting Wu ◽  
Wenjun Chen ◽  
Jinhua Zhang

Background The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) combined with antiplatelet drugs in patients with peripheral artery disease remain largely unknown. Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the effects of NOACs combined with antiplatelet drugs versus antiplatelet drugs alone in this population. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in 30 September 2020 and before. According to the I2 statistic, a random or fixed-effect model was used to analyze the safety and effectiveness of NOACs combined with antiplatelet drugs in peripheral artery disease patients. Results Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of 11,761 participants. Compared with antiplatelet drugs alone, NOACs combined with antiplatelet drugs resulted in lower risk of ischemic stroke events (OR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.57–0.98, p =  0.03), while other treatment effects were not worse than those of single antiplatelet drugs ( p ≥  0.05). In addition, although compared with single antiplatelet drugs alone, NOACs combined with antiplatelet drugs had a higher risk of major bleeding and clinically related nonmajor bleeding, their risk was not higher for intracranial hemorrhage, which may endanger the life of patients, or for fatal bleeding. Conclusions In summary, for peripheral artery disease patients, a combination of NOACs plus antiplatelet drugs may offer additional benefit in reducing ischemic stroke outcome, yet it may increase the risk of bleeding.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1450-1454
Author(s):  
Maurizio Paciaroni ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Michela Giustozzi ◽  
Valeria Caso ◽  
Elisabetta Toso ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Clinical trials on stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation have consistently shown clinical benefit from either warfarin or non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). NOAC-treated patients have consistently reported to be at lower risk for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) than warfarin-treated patients. The aims of this prospective, multicenter, multinational, unmatched, case-control study were (1) to investigate for risk factors that could predict ICH occurring in patients with atrial fibrillation during NOAC treatment and (2) to evaluate the role of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores in the same setting. Methods: Cases were consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who had ICH during NOAC treatment. Controls were consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who did not have ICH during NOAC treatment. As within the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores there are some risk factors in common, several multivariable logistic regression models were performed to identify independent prespecified predictors for ICH events. Results: Four hundred nineteen cases (mean age, 78.8±8.1 years) and 1526 controls (mean age, 76.0±10.3 years) were included in the study. From the different models performed, independent predictors of ICH were increasing age, concomitant use of antiplatelet agents, active malignancy, high risk of fall, hyperlipidemia, low clearance of creatinine, peripheral artery disease, and white matter changes. Low doses of NOACs (given according to label or not) and congestive heart failure were inversely associated with the risk of ICH. HAS-BLED and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores performed poorly in predicting ICH with areas under the curves of 0.496 (95% CI, 0.468–0.525) and 0.530 (95% CI, 0.500–0.560), respectively. Conclusions: Several risk factors were associated to ICH in patients treated with NOACs for stroke prevention but not HAS-BLED and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (38) ◽  
pp. 4511-4515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koutsoumpelis ◽  
C. Argyriou ◽  
K.M. Tasopoulou ◽  
E.I. Georgakarakos ◽  
G.S. Georgiadis

Background: Peripheral artery disease is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis which strongly correlates to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition, the progression of peripheral artery disease leads to an increased risk of limb loss. In order to reduce these events, the benchmark of treatment and research over the last years has been the antiplatelet therapy which aims at inhibition of platelet aggregation. Over the last years, new studies combining antiplatelet agents in different therapeutic schemes have been proven efficacious. Unfortunately, patients remain still at high risk of CV events. Novel Oral Anticoagulants have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin, in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The rationale of using medication which acts on platelet activation and the coagulation pathway of thrombosis has led investigators to examine the role of Noac's in preventing CV events in patients with peripheral artery disease, stable or unstable. Methods: The aim of this study is to review the current evidence with respect to recently published studies concerning the use of Novel anticoagulants in peripheral artery disease. Results: The Compass trial has shown that a combination of rivaroxaban with traditional therapy may produce promising results in reducing amputation rates, stroke, cardiac events, and mortality, however, there are still safety issues with bleeding requiring acute care. The ePAD study has provided us with insight concerning safety and efficacy after peripheral angioplasty or stenting and actually the need for further research. The Voyager Pad study, following the steps of Compass, is studying the effect and safety of the addition of rivaroxaban to traditional therapy in the highest risk population aka patients undergoing peripheral revascularization. The evidence concerning patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation appears to be insufficient, however, recent guidelines propose the use of novel oral anticoagulants. Conclusion: For the time being, novel oral anticoagulants in combination with aspirin may provide an alternative treatment in PAD, however, it is deemed necessary to identify patient subgroups who will benefit the most.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document