scholarly journals The importance of a multidisciplinary team in rectal cancer management

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-285
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Vasile Bochis ◽  
Zsolt Fekete ◽  
Catalin Vlad ◽  
Bogdan Fetica ◽  
Daniel Corneliu Leucuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
International Guidelines ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
The Impact

Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between surgery and adjuvant treatments regarding the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients from a developing country. For stages II and III rectal cancer, international guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regardless of the tumor location. In the developing countries  there is a shortage of radiotherapy centers, specialists, which lead to long waiting lists for radiotherapy. These problems might lead to protocol deviations.Methods. We conducted a retrospective study on 161 patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery, postoperative CRT and with or without chemotherapy for a total of 6 months, at The Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca between 2006- 2010. All patients had 5 years of follow-up.Results. A total of 161 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of patients were locally advanced stages (89.44%). The well known prognostic factors, such as TNM stage, performance status, CEA serum level, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, and node capsular effraction had a statistically significant influence on overall survival. In 21.12% of patients the first adjuvant treatment was started in the first 4 weeks after surgery. Only 13.04% of patients started the concomitant CRT within the limit of 6 weeks after surgery. Concerning the time between surgery and CRT, we did not observe a statistically significantly difference in OS if the radiotherapy started after the first 6 weeks (p=0.701). The OS rate for locally advanced rectal cancer patients was 69.44%.Conclusions. In rectal cancer, the importance of the first therapeutic act is crucial. Following international guidelines provides a survival advantage and a better quality of life. In case of adjuvant treatment, it is recommended to start this treatment as soon as the local infrastructure allows it.

Factors predictive of receiving neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer and the impact on overall survival.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 686-686
Author(s):  
Alex Richard Coffman ◽  
Dustin Boothe ◽  
Jonathan Evans Frandsen ◽  
Molly Gross ◽  
Thomas Bartley Pickron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Impact

686 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is generally accepted as the optimal treatment strategy compared to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer due to improvement in local control and reduced toxicity. However, NCRT has not been shown to improve overall survival (OS). We investigated the effect of NCRT versus ACRT on OS as well as the impact of demographic factors and clinical stage for the selection of each treatment approach utilizing the National Cancer Data Base. Methods: Adult patients with stage II and stage III adenocarcinoma of the rectum diagnosed from 2004-2013 were included. Chi-square analysis was used to compare demographic variables and clinical stage between the NCRT and ACRT treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors predictive of each treatment strategy. Kaplan Meier and log-rank analysis along with propensity score matching was performed to determine the effect on OS. Results: A total of 20,262 patients were identified: 17,737 (87.5%) received NCRT and 2,525 (12.5%) received ACRT. Utilization of NCRT increased over the study period (p < 0.01). Factors associated with receipt of NCRT on multivariate analysis include: treatment at an academic institution (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85), income greater than $46,000 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.92), and living greater than 50 miles from a treatment facility. Factors associated with receipt of ACRT on multivariate analysis include: female sex (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24), Charlson comorbidity index of 1 (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34), and radiotherapy dose greater than 5040 centigray (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.56-1.98). Compared to ACRT, NCRT was associated with a decreased risk of death on multivariate analysis (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-1.00), which persisted after propensity score analysis. Conclusions: The use of NCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer is increasing and is associated with an OS benefit compared to ACRT.

scholarly journals Elevated Platelet Count as Predictor of Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Toiyama ◽  
Yasuhiro Inoue ◽  
Mikio Kawamura ◽  
Aya Kawamoto ◽  
Yoshinaga Okugawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
The Impact

The impact of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) on prognostic and predictive outcome in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has not been fully investigated. This retrospective study enrolled 89 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and for whom platelet (PLT) counts and SIR status [neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR)] were available. Both clinical values of PLT and SIR status in rectal cancer patients were investigated. Elevated PLT, NLR, PLR, and pathologic TNM stage III [ypN(+)] were associated with significantly poor overall survival (OS). Elevated PLT, NLR, and ypN(+) were shown to independently predict OS. Elevated PLT and ypN(+) significantly predicted poor disease-free survival (DFS). Elevated PLT was identified as the only independent predictor of DFS. PLT counts are a promising pre-CRT biomarker for predicting recurrence and poor prognosis in rectal cancer.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in the Downstaging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and its Impact on Progression–Free Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Tatjana Neško ◽  
Arvils Neško ◽  
Elīna Sīviņa ◽  
Gunta Purkalne
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

SummaryIntroductionThe standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by radical surgery, which allows to reduce local recurrence, downsize the tumor and facilitate its R0 resection.Aim of the studyThe aim of this study was to evaluate the downstaging of LARC after NACRT and to assess the impact of downstaging on progression–free survival (PFS).Materials and methods65 patients diagnosed with LARC from 2012 to 2018, who received NACRT with subsequent radical surgery were identified in the Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital in Riga and included in this retrospective study. Average follow–up period was 31 months. Data were analysed with SPSS Statistics 22.0, Wilcoxon signed–rank test and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were performed.ResultsOverall, 66.7% (n=40) of patients experienced a downstaging in response to NACRT, of which 37.5% (n=24, p=0.004) had a downstaging of T and 63.3% (n=38, p=0.0001) of N.12–month PFS was 87.8%, 24–month PFS – 66.1% and 3–year PFS – 62.7%, median PFS (mPFS) was not met. 3–year PFS of those patients treated with intravenous 5FU/LV boluses was significantly higher (76.5%) than those who received oral tegafur (45.6%, mPFS 32 months), p=0.038. 3–year PFS of patients with downstaged T was 85.9%, compared to 52.1% without it; mPFS not met, p=0.04. Similarly, 3–year PFS of patients with downstaged N was 71.5%, compared to 43.3% without it (mPFS 24 months), p=0.112. Lymphatic and vascular invasion were associated with significantly lower PFS compared to the patients with absent lymphatic and vascular invasion (p=0.0001 and p=0.014, respectively), while perineural invasion did not show any impact on PFS. Age at diagnosis, tumor location, type of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant impact on PFS.ConclusionsResults confirm the efficacy of NACRT in LARC in the downstaging of T and N. Downstaging of LARC, intravenous chemotherapy and absence of lymphovascular invasion are associated with significantly increased PFS.

scholarly journals Long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with versus without a concomitant boost in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial (FDRT-002)

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwen Wang ◽  
Yun Guan ◽  
Weilie Gu ◽  
Senxiang Yan ◽  
Juying Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Incision Healing

Abstract Background This study was designed to explore whether an intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) led to a better clinical outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomly allocated to receive either pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of 50 Gy/25Fx concurrently with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (Arm A), or pelvic radiation of 50 Gy/25Fx with a concomitant boost of 5 Gy to the primary lesion, followed by a cycle of XELOX 2 weeks after the end of CRT (Arm B). All patients were planned to receive a definitive operation 8 weeks after the completion of CRT and a total of six perioperative chemotherapy cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin regardless of pathological result. Pathological complete response (ypCR) was the primary endpoint. Results From February 2010 to December 2011, 120 patients from three centers were enrolled in this study. Ninety-five percent patients completed a full-dose chemoradiotherapy as planning. Then 53 and 57 patients received a radical surgery, and 8 and 14 cases were confirmed as ypCR in two groups (P = 0.157). The other 10 patients failed to receive a definitive resection because of unresectable disease. Similar toxicities were observed between two groups and more incision healing delay were found in Arm B (3 vs.13, P = 0.011). No statistical differences were observed in local-regional control (P = 0.856), disease-free survival (P = 0.349) and overall survival (P = 0.553). Mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement was an independent prognostic factor for survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusions A concomitant boost to oxalipatin-combined preoperative chemoradiotherapy demonstrated a slightly higher pCR rate but delayed incision healing after surgery. The impact of MRF involvement on survival merits further investigations. Trial registration NCT01064999 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 626-626
Author(s):  
Kirsten Elizabeth Jean Laws ◽  
Christina Wilson ◽  
David McIntosh ◽  
Stephen Harrow
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Pre Treatment

626 Background: Established guidelines exist for indications of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer. However, in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unproven. We evaluated clinical decision making behind adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients in our institute. Methods: Patients treated with long course chemoradiotherapy between January 2008 and December 2009 were identified. Exclusion criteria were inoperable disease, postoperative, recurrence, or palliative intent. 231 cases were examined retrospectively for the decisions behind giving or withholding adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: 35 (15%) were ineligible for consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy due to disease progression. 38 patients (16.4%) received chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting and 158 patients (68.4%) were potentially eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy, but did not receive it. The majority of clinicians based their decisions on post operative pathology results, and the key factor in decision making was final pathological stage in 65%. Clinicians considered pre-treatment imaging a key factor in only 14% of cases, despite a considerable number of patients being downstaged from a potentially higher initial pre-treatment stage that could have warranted adjuvant treatment. A considerable number of patients (25%) were deemed unfit for adjuvant treatment following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery due to toxicity of combined treatment. Conclusions: This analysis highlights the difficulty in clinical decision making for adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer. The accuracy of pre-treatment staging is difficult to ascertain and its use to justify post operative treatment uncertain. It appears the majority of clinicians in our institute base their decision on post operative pathology. A considerable number of patients were not fit for consideration of adjuvant treatment due to toxicity of previous treatment. Further research is warranted as to the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy, particularly in a setting where prior treatment already causes significant toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document